A less biased view of the Bools loss

I see the usual anti Jake posters are on about how poorly coached the Bools are. They aren’t. The Saints played exceptionally well and their defense, the big difference, was playing at test level intensity.

The Bools actually created a lot of opportunities, but perhaps tried to force the last pass. And clearly the defense was poor. The last try, for example, which the dumb commentator tried to blame on Moody was actually just an overlap, the defense didn’t shift.

Hanekom was obviously very good but I am left wondering if Elrigh Louw and Steenekamp are the real deal. 

Wehe . . . the most biased and prejudiced poster on the board presenting his "less biased" and ignorant view.

LMAO!

I see . . . so you guys are giving Joke White a free pass because the other team played well?

LMAO!

Why didn't the Springbok-laden Bulls play well ? Because they have a crap coach is why.

Mozart 

With repect the Bulls made twice as many handling rrors than Northampton did.    That indicates poor skils developent by he coch.   The Bulls made to many penalized errors as well.   And the whole attacking pattern of the uls were preditctable making  defense easier, 

Sure Northmpton played better rugby than te Bulls but continuus faulty play and making the sme mistakes all the time  represents real BS/         

Not singling out the Bulls only - have you seen what I wrot about the Stormers and Sharks?   

Somre of  Bulls players never played for the Springboks  coached by Erasmus.  But  of the present Bulls coming from the Springbok team was top class - especially Hanekom      I believe the main problem is that  the coachig environment under Erasmus may cause problems       

You think Erasmus’ coaching environment is the problem…. Seems a bit harsh.

or Mozarrt

T coching envionment of erasmus is a class above anybody else in S - but the coaching on faachie level is not and  the three coaches of he Buls, Sharks and Stormers are BS supreme.    The Bulls were given endless money to spend on player recruitment and they fucked up royally.  That is why Rupert and Motepe appointed Bris to protect their rugby interests and it would become  clear that he may be disastisfied with what is happening in the case of te Bulls in particular.

In the case of the Sormers there unde judicial managment a present andrun by SARU when it comes to fundng and expenditure - functions Erasms is not involved in..    the tem th seleced was weeird and in the man they were not playing their best players on Saturday.   I fact it was a team of payes that iclded unknown player - while players like Sacha and Malnerbe was available to lay.    The tem w captined byMoerat  - one of th worst locks in S who cannot even jump i line-outs and tackled going back in tackles by baackline players. 

Thi coming Sruday h Bulls is playing the Sharks in a UC match and the Stroemers are playing the Lions.   - it would eb interesting to se what ahppens in those two maches,   

Well two weeks ago this Bools team beat Connacht away by 28 points to 14….is this team so much better than the one that played for the Sharks on Saturday:

Give us your player by player analysis,

No it was the Bulls side that beat Connacht….the point being despite missing some top players they were still able to win big away. There was a red card to each team….net 35 minute man advantage to the Bools, worth 5 of the 14 point differential.

But Northampton played well. You all keep overlooking that fact. 

Mitchell at 9, you mean. 

Ha ha ha ! 

Randall plays for Bristol. 

You are rubbish  

Awwww.