https://www.tiktok.com/@kayosports/video/7433178952442580241
Captain49,914 posts
04 Nov 2024, 15:52
#1
04 Nov 2024, 15:52#1
A new way of beating the tackle
Started by Mozart21 REPLIES2,225 VIEWS· 04 Nov 2024, 15:52
Pro5,061 posts
04 Nov 2024, 16:02
#2
04 Nov 2024, 16:02#2
Wow how athletic to jump over another player… and the player he jumped over, is not short at all.
Imagine DDA trying that move, his jewels would have to be iced for a long time:)
Captain49,914 posts
04 Nov 2024, 16:43
#3
04 Nov 2024, 16:43#3
Hahaha….unlike most players Dud always has at least one foot on the ground even when he runs.
Captain30,741 posts
04 Nov 2024, 16:56
#4
04 Nov 2024, 16:56#4
Would that be the best 12 in the game?
Captain49,914 posts
04 Nov 2024, 17:03
#5
04 Nov 2024, 17:03#5
Walter Payton would have been the best 12 of all time. Best runner I have seen….sadly died young:
Captain30,741 posts
04 Nov 2024, 17:20
#6
04 Nov 2024, 17:20#6
Bullshit - that’s a huge insult to all the great 12’s that have played the game
Captain49,914 posts
04 Nov 2024, 18:25
#7
04 Nov 2024, 18:25#7
How would you know Dave….I saw Paton and I have seen many of the great 12s. Paton would have been unstoppable at 12. And looking at those long passes he could have handled the offload brilliantly as well.
Insular pig headed ignorance.
Captain30,741 posts
04 Nov 2024, 19:05
#8
04 Nov 2024, 19:05#8
Well I know that playing 12 is one of if not the most demanding position on a rugby field, I know that rugby is very different to AFL and there is far more skill required in rugby
I also know that there have been some brilliant 12’s in our time and even the solid ones would be better than some AFL player who looked handy enough but boy there was some piss poor defence in that footage - no surprise really given the majority of the AFL players are big fat oafs with zero skill
The only skilful players are the QB’s and wide receivers, the rest are pretty shit
Captain18,117 posts
04 Nov 2024, 19:30
#9
04 Nov 2024, 19:30#9
Wehe . . . so now Moffie reckons the Gridiron sissy-boys would all be the best rugby players!
LMAO!
Take off their helmets and their shoulder pads and put them onto a rugby field and they'd burst into tears and go running off to get their nappies changed . . . sorry, their diapers!
Captain49,914 posts
04 Nov 2024, 19:55
#10
04 Nov 2024, 19:55#10
The old out of date claim….football is far more violent than rugby now, with all the nannying from TMO’s.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pfNMHH6Qnf4
Educate yourself you insular toad.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pfNMHH6Qnf4
Educate yourself you insular toad.
Captain49,914 posts
04 Nov 2024, 20:05
#11
04 Nov 2024, 20:05#11
Think about it this way Dave….football draws out of a population of 350 million and pays huge dollars for success. How likely is it that those players are big fat oafs with zero skill.
Captain18,117 posts
04 Nov 2024, 20:14
#12
04 Nov 2024, 20:14#12
"Educate yourself" says the rugby noob claiming that some stupid Yank gurly-boy who's never held a rugby ball in his life would be the greatest i nside centre of all time.
Waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaahahahahahahahahahahaha!
Captain30,741 posts
04 Nov 2024, 20:30
#13
04 Nov 2024, 20:30#13
Well Moz I’ve watched plenty of footage of the game and there is no skill in being one of those fat oafs
That’s just the dumb Americans paying huge amounts of money for a stupid boring game
There is no way in hell that sissy game is more violent than rugby - not even close
Those sissy’s are padded to the hilt with helmets the works
There is very little skill involved, it’s like football - the only way to watch it, is the highlights packages
Captain49,914 posts
04 Nov 2024, 20:30
#14
04 Nov 2024, 20:30#14
Men’s track and field medals at the 2024 Olympics, the best indicator of national athletic prowess:
USA 18
RWC nations in total 9
Say no more…..Game, set and match.
Captain49,914 posts
04 Nov 2024, 20:31
#15
04 Nov 2024, 20:31#15
It’s soooooooo easy. It would be more fun if the opposition could construct a cogent argument.
Captain30,741 posts
04 Nov 2024, 20:34
#16
04 Nov 2024, 20:34#16
Track and field my arse - totally different sports which is no measure of overall prowess in sport not even close
Fuck me the States have huge amounts pumped into their sport and athletes - we can say the same for African countries now can we
Rugby is a far far more skilful, enjoyable and dangerous game than AFL
Captain18,117 posts
04 Nov 2024, 20:44
#17
04 Nov 2024, 20:44#17
Except this isn't a discussion of athletics prowess, it's a discussion on rugby prowess, not so?
So the relevant statistic here is South Africa 4, USA 0.
LMAO!
Go wipe all that egg off your stupid face Moffie, don't let it harden.
So the relevant statistic here is South Africa 4, USA 0.
LMAO!
Go wipe all that egg off your stupid face Moffie, don't let it harden.
Captain49,914 posts
04 Nov 2024, 21:22
#18
04 Nov 2024, 21:22#18
So how many games do you think we would win against the USA in baseball, football, basketball, ice hockey etc. Huh? Different nations play different sports and it’s almost impossible to compare.
Rugby is a game played by a tiny group of mostly college exposed kids in the USA. If it was mainstream the US would be awesome.
I much prefer rugby to football, which I find too static but it’s a game played by great athletes and it’s very physical. Those Dud Toit tackles that give you a thrill would be regarded as standard practice in football.
You really are an okie from Benoni.
Captain30,741 posts
04 Nov 2024, 21:32
#19
04 Nov 2024, 21:32#19
Imagine those clowns taking off all that armour and tackling another player - they would shit themselves
It’s literally only the States that play baseball and AFL because they think they are special having to create their own stupid sports
AFL is a bunch of fatties with limited skill and baseball is all about throwing a ball and hitting a full toss out the ground
Trust the yanks to get all wet over such shit. As for the basketball - fuck me now that is a boring game
Pro5,061 posts
04 Nov 2024, 21:48
#20
04 Nov 2024, 21:48#20
Rugby and American football are both physically demanding sports, requiring a high level of skill, toughness, and endurance, but they differ in various aspects. Let’s break it down:
Skill Level: Both sports require a unique set of skills. In rugby, players need to be versatile, as they switch between offense and defense without major breaks. Passing, kicking, and tackling skills are essential. American football players often specialize in specific roles, requiring them to master particular skills like throwing, catching, or blocking.
Toughness: Both sports are tough, but the nature of contact differs. Rugby players endure continuous play and tackling without pads or helmets, relying on technique for protection. American football involves hard hits with protective gear, making it physically intense but in shorter bursts.
Endurance: Rugby demands greater endurance due to the continuous nature of the game, with fewer stoppages and more running. American football, with its frequent breaks and shorter periods of intense activity, requires explosive power but less overall stamina.
In essence, both sports are challenging in their own right, each demanding a unique combination of skills, toughness, and endurance.
Captain49,914 posts
04 Nov 2024, 22:38
#21
04 Nov 2024, 22:38#21
Good summary M.
Pro5,061 posts
04 Nov 2024, 23:10
#22
04 Nov 2024, 23:10#22
Can’t take all the credit Moz, Chat GPT helped me to add some things and refined it a bit.
— END OF THREAD —
More from Rugby
- RugbyScotland dominate the stats29 REPLIES · 110 VIEWS
- RugbyUnder 20 Springbok team to play the Under 20 England team i the RWC semi on Mondat8 REPLIES · 65 VIEWS
- RugbySpringboks vs Scotland - Monday retrospective10 REPLIES · 66 VIEWS
- RugbyMonday Morning Team7 REPLIES · 57 VIEWS
- NewsWallabies Struggle: Schmidt's High Stakes Exit Plan1 REPLIES
- RugbyThe De Villers brother saga as loosies1 REPLIES · 12 VIEWS