Captain23,246 posts
23 Sept 2019, 21:05
#1
23 Sept 2019, 21:05#1
Gonna be sooo good watching the whistle turn on them in the semis.
They missed the off the ball laundry line tackle on PSDT by Kierang Read...turning into a cheap shot merchant. Disgraceful officiating...too much to be just human error.
Here is a small fact.
If this video was of the Boks getting advantageous calls, most Bok fans would be of the same opinion in terms of how shyte the ref was.
That's the difference. That's the very inconveniently disturbing difference between us + the rest of the world...And the kiwis.
Remember when the Lions got the high penalty count at Ellis Park this year?
We all said it was obviously not fair.
It's shameful.
NZ = Ego>Country>Rugby
Nope Plum, not all Saffas said it wash fishy, but there were a few, not only denials or ignoring the obvious.
The French are too emotional ....... rather give me that 'happy' lil Welshman.
Draad, find the thread if you can.
Lol
Do have a read of CC the raging homo's performance on that thread...
What confused homo-erectile-disfunction he is.
Here's a sneak preview...my my, looks like the poor sod just have up. Hence the confused weirdo we see today...
Jul 11, 2017, 12:20
"Just another "win" for them with the aid of the ref.
It too produced a strutt and a lot of self adoration.
They prefer it when the contest is taken out of a match."
Oh...And looks like WD was right about CC
Posted by: Wardad (6619 posts)Jul 11, 2017, 22:31
Hey JW about CC ,was it peeking out of the closet eh ?
You know what they say about the g ay bashers and their inner desires hahahaha!Looks like everyone has decided that they cant beat the All Blacks fair and square so now to try to influence the refs through the press with a biased view.
As Mozart points out you are only looking at one side of the coin, there was plenty that the Boks got away with so don't go trying to tell me its a one way street.
Would be interesting if someone with the know how did a video on the Boks to see how it really stacks up
Strzok
One has to accept that lies and distortions are always the reason why you earn the Strzok designation in full, I looked at the scrums and their is no indication that Malherbe's knee was on the ground as claimed by you. The same thing always happens when it comes to your distorted claims and that is a fact of life in your case. The way the scrum is going the fact is the knee was NOT on the ground and Moody lost his bind as well.
If Malherbe's knee was on the ground he should have been penalized - but it was clear it was not. Another physical impossibility is cooked up by you again. Get real for a change and not deserve the further designation - the nightmare caused by Labuschagne for you to you very real distort ion tactics.
I looked at the scrums and their is no indication that Malherbe's knee was on the ground as claimed by you
Are you serious, Mike? Really?
Here are the three scrums in a row. Scrum 3 the knee and elbow looks simultaneous to me though, it's hard to see when exactly it hits the ground due to Steph's position. On the first two the knee is definitely down first.
Who knows who is pulling who down though, scrums are a mystery to me.
Funny as article above re drinking game... be like having a shot every time the Aussie's drop the ball after 3phases...
Or... having a shot every time the kiwis get preferential treatment from the ref...
Now that would be real alcohol poisoning...
Strzok and Comey - Liars personified
For Malherbe's action to be considered as kneeling and to be contravening the law and be penalized for kneeling his knee had to be bent and it was straight in that case, Do you two ever think before you write BS on site or must you always manufacture BS to make any point to be considered as being of value?
Tu'umgafasi and Moody did exactly what Moody did in scrums on Saturday and was blown up 4 times for that in the RC. Idiotic twisters I have ever seen coming up with such BS again and again.
his knee had to be bent and it was straight in that case
Oh dear lord
Your photos is as per normal not worth anything dofdoos. Look at what happened in real game s and not use unclear photos to try your distortions BSter, Did you not notice that the knee in your first photo DID NOT touch the ground and the subsequent photos indicated that it did because Moody was already going down after loosing his bind. the knee in the first pho to was lightly bend -- which is always the case while any scrum is forming in all matches by all props. Oh dear Lord. .
Looked in high res again:
Scrum 1: Malherbe's knee down immediately on engage, then back up. Then elbow down, followed by knee.
Scrum 2: Knee down, then elbow down, then knee up, then elbow up, then elbow down, then knee down.
Scrum 3: Knee, then elbow.
"And much as the incident with a player around Stephanie's neck looks bad.....Stephanie himself attacked the neck at about minute 10.00"
The difference being that PSDT was tackled high to prevent him from getting to the ball carrier. Deliberately taking out the defender with a bigh tackle to boot. Extremely cynical professional foul play. Should have been carded or cited...., but IMO the officials looked the other way because the were too gutless to card the Allblack captain.
Strzok - the nightmare Labuschagne caused for you is back again
What had the two incidents involving Du Toit to do with each other? As per normal you are on a BS lying and distortion campaign. The story about what Read did was a real issue - the Du Toit tackle was maybe penalizable since the tackle was on the high side - the Read issue was a totally dangerous and illegal on three counts.
Please do not go on in your normal idiotic and prejudiced mode. If Etzebeth or the useless Mostert was involved and not Du Toit you would have screamed blue murder. So better shut up moron.
Read the following comments from Proudfoot about the scrum issue - maybe you will learn something about a game where you know nothing about and where your prejudice leads to venemous BS comment on site:-
"In an opening 20-minute period the Springboks looked to have the upper hand over the New Zealand front row as three scrums collapsed and on a fourth, the All Black pack was sent backward, popping up as the scrum disintegrated. The refs turned a blind eye, however, allowing play to continue every time without going to the whistle.
When questioned whether South Africa will speak with match officials about the scrum penalties, Proudfoot said he is ‘sure’ Rassie will bring various issues forward."
The latter also applies to Comey as well.
There is no doubt flab Malherbe was using his knee to prop himself up.
Flab Malherbe was trying to do his belly-flop routine, and Moody was holding him up and preventing a scrum collapse.
SB
Read what Proudfoot said and stop your lying BS please. Mozazart start with this BS in 2013 and lied his arse off as per normal and you followed him like a licker of what he writes. Get he message? LOL
No Strzok - your nightmare caused by Labuschagne is back in full force.
Go to the item on refereeing started by Rooinek and see what World Rugby thinks of the refereeing thus far. Always 100% wrong in everything - is it not time that you stop your BS? So World Rugby is wrong and you are right? LMAO
By the way World Rugby put Lawrence on leave after the test you referred to - will the same be done to Garces?
LMAO
Well on another note, I dispute the three Bok "knock-ons" below.
41:08 Steph - clearly backwards
72:55 Pollard - clearly backwards
80:53 Mapimpi - straight at worst, Willie actually catches the ball behind Mapimpi as it bounces out of the latter's hands without it hitting the ground. If that was a pass from Mapimpi to Willie there was no way you would call it forward, so why is it ruled a knock?
If Flab Malherbe put on a bit more weight he could balance on his gut, instead of using his knee to prop himself up each scrum. Poor Moody got the blame, but it was clear he was holding the scrum by carrying the weight of Malherbe.
Maybe Clever Duplicate could mention this to the parents of Flab, and maybe check up on what Meyer Bosman's mother says?
Listen shitbrain - nobody needs your moronic personal attacks on site.
I would rather listen to what Proudfoot said on the issue of the scrumming than what you invented, I would add to that - read the statement of World Rugby and remember what Proudfoot said on the issue and it is clear that things went badly wrong in the AB game.
It is clear that unlike the whimpering Meyer did previously - Erasmus took the matter up with World Rugby and that they publicly reacted on the issue.
Duplicate
Another duplicate CleverTrever , you need to think about reducing your posts, not increasing the BS. Although, the duplicate post that is blank is perhaps your most objective contributions.