According to Mozart New Zealand rugby commentators are clueless

I was listening to commenting on the North Harbour  - Southlands game this morning and there were comments on "aimless kicks".   According to Mozart there is no such thing as an "aimless kick".
After all it is a 90% requirement from flyhalfs to kick balls and with that much kicking any game will be won by just continuous kicking of the ball.  Any kicking will do - so he compares Carter and Steyn on par as flyhalfs. 


 

  

Haven't they got dams or something near Riversdale, where you can go do some real fishing for real fish using real fishing tackle?

 Why stop at commentators!!! 

 Correction Mike  -->only Justin Marshall is clueless.

 Hacked waaagh Justin Marshall is the exception that proves the rule. 

 Ceradunce
There is major irrigation scheme at Riversdale and a major dam providing the scheme as well as the town with water.  
No need  to go fishing in this case - just being factual about the contributions of the NZ commentators on the one hand and Mozart (the self-declared) board rugby genius on the other hand.

Nah, ou Tokkie, don't you realise that anybody can spot your fishing expeditions by now?

Most kicks are aimed.....how can we prove this? Well most kicks go forwards towards the opponents line ....so some level of aiming is involved. Moz 1/NZ commentators zero.

 I heard tell your Mum used urinal cakes for her boys to aim at but didn't always get the desired result.

 The idiot does not realize the difference between aimless kicks and strategic kicks - so that is where he pretends to know something about rugby.  NZ Commentators 1  - Mozart -5.   He is even too stupid to get 0.

 The idiot does not realize the difference between aimless kicks and strategic kicks - so that is where he pretends to know something about rugby.  NZ Commentators 1  - Mozart -5.   He is even too stupid to get 0.

Funny Cloudy....your mother was a wise person