JWJust_win
Captain18,570 posts
JWJust_winCaptain18,570 posts
08 Sept 2014, 22:40#2
Moz: I watched it & yes some big hits for sure but physicality is not enough win games by itself.
My view is the Boks fans so love the big hit, the dominating pack, man-handling players all over the field that they lose their wits (shark like feeding frenzy). They always look so stunned when they look up to see they have lost the game. Boks need better ball handling skills across the park.
MOMozart
Captain49,914 posts
MOMozartCaptain49,914 posts
08 Sept 2014, 22:53#3
We should have both JW ....powerful centres and forwards who can handle. We have missed Schalk, as a distributor
JWJust_win
Captain18,570 posts
JWJust_winCaptain18,570 posts
08 Sept 2014, 22:59#4
Schalk does have that skill for sure (and great ball handling skills) but he is one of the few that seem to play that role in the bok pack.
Plus, will he make it to the RWC? As a bench player maybe but he has come back from serious injury & a life threatening injury the Boks need more like him IMO.
MOMozart
Captain49,914 posts
MOMozartCaptain49,914 posts
08 Sept 2014, 23:13#5
Unlikel y Schalk will get back to where he was...same with Juan Smith. To be honest much of this is coaching....Eddie Jones changed the Bok team's handling in a few weeks before RWC07.
CLclevermike
Coach57,555 posts
CLclevermikeCoach57,555 posts
08 Sept 2014, 23:20#6
Mozart
Ypou are bloody dilly to blame S erfomnnetein and Lambuie for th e two tries - completely AWOL of the brain. The bugger ups were made by Morne in te first instance - so w hy go for others?
SASaffolk
Captain30,741 posts
SASaffolk Captain30,741 posts
09 Sept 2014, 00:46#8
de Allende is more physical than Jean and Fourie.
Serfontein is as physical as Jean and Fourie.
JJ is not as physical as Jean or Fourie.
Frans is the most physical of them all.
MOMozart
Captain49,914 posts
MOMozartCaptain49,914 posts
09 Sept 2014, 00:52#9
Sure and you are 6 ft Dave....dream on in your high heels.
SASaffolk
Captain30,741 posts
SASaffolk Captain30,741 posts
09 Sept 2014, 01:07#10
Yep 1.83m is 6ft which is what I am and people on this site who have met me in person will vouch for that very fact. Without a tape measure everyone of Becs, Rooi and Mike would without reservation say that I was around the 6ft mark. You are just a bare faced liar.
As for my take on the physicality of the centres it is 100% spot on
09 Sept 2014, 01:26#11
I will measure you next time, Saffex ! And take photographic evidence !!!
Or maybe a third party should do it ???
SASaffolk
Captain30,741 posts
SASaffolk Captain30,741 posts
09 Sept 2014, 01:38#12
How tall would you say I am Becs?
09 Sept 2014, 01:45#13
A lot taller than me !
Around the 6ft mark. That was my impression.
How tall would you say I am ??
09 Sept 2014, 01:51#15
Really ? I am smaller than that...but probably that height in my cripple boots. I suppose if you had seen me without them on you would realise I am shorter........
But only by half an inch or so !!
Well done you. Very good perception of height, Mr S
MOMozart
Captain49,914 posts
MOMozartCaptain49,914 posts
09 Sept 2014, 03:33#16
That's funny... the first height you gave way back when was 1.78 metres. Look up the feet to metres table?
SASaffolk
Captain30,741 posts
SASaffolk Captain30,741 posts
09 Sept 2014, 15:59#17
Don't lie Moffie I have NEVER given 1.78m...............but be my guest and prove me wrong liar
MOMozart
Captain49,914 posts
MOMozartCaptain49,914 posts
09 Sept 2014, 16:18#18
Dave you may wish to be six feet, you may have put six feet in your mouth already today, you may know people who are six feet, your progeny may be six feet......but you are 5' 10.5". How do I know that? Because I am 5' 11.5 " and I only wear high fashion, thin soled Italian shoes. And you were still an inch shorter than me in your thick soled boots. End of.
CLclevermike
Coach57,555 posts
CLclevermikeCoach57,555 posts
09 Sept 2014, 17:31#20
Mozart
I did not follow this thread before - but when I saw what you wrote above - it just shows ypour idicoy again. When did Frans make a line break this year? In the Crusaders game Crotty mistakenly went out of line and there was a gap open in front of him. If Steyn cpould not take advantage of that one opportunity he ahd this year - he would have been a poorer player that he really is.
Just find me one case where Steyn made a line break this year please. Therew was none. He was the worst player in that regard in Super 15 - and you name him as an example for other players - what a farce.
09 Sept 2014, 18:36#21
I am 1.90m (6'3)! D amn I must be awesome!!!!!!!
I had no idea it was so important. All people under 1.90m, your opinions no longer matter. Sorry for you!!!!
AJArthur John
Pro1,748 posts
AJArthur JohnPro1,748 posts
09 Sept 2014, 19:29#22
Stand tall Dave....unlike our friend from the States.
MOMozart
Captain49,914 posts
MOMozartCaptain49,914 posts
09 Sept 2014, 19:39#23
Bloo the height is unimportant, and the lie is amusing. Would you bet on a poster (Dave), who claims saying he would bet on the Worlds is not a prediction they are going to win? Think about it! This fella is a short, fat toad....but he does tell some tall tales.
MOMozart
Captain49,914 posts
MOMozartCaptain49,914 posts
09 Sept 2014, 20:39#26
Can't say I've seen them call you 6 ft Dave. But even if they did, at 5' 11.5 " I am the perfect measurement standard and you were an inch shorter. Your original call of 178 cms puts you at exactly 5 ft 10.1 inches....that's where you are. The rest is probably your boots vs my Guccis.
SASaffolk
Captain30,741 posts
SASaffolk Captain30,741 posts
10 Sept 2014, 00:44#27
Moffie what part of Becs saying I was 6ft did you miss?
Do you think that lying about me saying I was 1.78m carries weight. Stop lying old man.
As for you being taller than me that is a joke. But you are built like a girl.
FOForeverArizona
Club Pro580 posts
FOForeverArizonaClub Pro580 posts
10 Sept 2014, 00:48#28
This is so irrelevant to rugby...LOLOLOL