FIXTURESNo upcoming fixtures — check back soon.
FORUM / RUGBY /  All Black counter attack all started with Mitchell (according to some). Rugby Stuff

All Black counter attack all started with Mitchell (according to some). Rugby Stuff

Started by Just_win5 REPLIES536 VIEWS· 30 Aug 2018, 14:12
SHAREXFACEBOOKWHATSAPPTELEGRAMREDDITLINKEDIN
JW
Just_winCaptain18,570 posts
30 Aug 2018, 14:12
#1
30 Aug 2018, 14:12#1

All Blacks' lethal counter attack strategy 'due to John Mitchell's basketball background'

 

An Australian rugby critic has credited John Mitchell for sparking the All Blacks' counter attack strategies which are still serving Steve Hansen's team well 16 years later.

 

Bret Harris, writing for The Guardian, claimed Mitchell's basketball background as a New Zealand under-21 international had played a big part in the All Blacks' mastery of "transition" opportunities.

 

He said the much-travelled Mitchell - about to take up a role as England's defence coach - had masterminded a concept now used at all levels of professional rugby in New Zealand.

 

"As a basketballer, Mitchell understood the importance of transition, when the ball changes hands from one team to the other, which has become the foundation of the modern All Blacks' style of play," Harris wrote.

 

John Mitchell devised the All Blacks' counter attacking strategies based on his basketball experience of the importance of transition moments, according to an Australian rugby critic.

 

"Mitchell placed a strong emphasis on counter-attacking from turnover ball and kick receipt as All Blacks coach between 2001 and 2003, while his coaching co-ordinator Robbie Deans was about to turn counter-attack into an art form at the Crusaders in Super Rugby.

 

"That is not to say there were not great counter-attacking New Zealand teams and players previously, but the idea became more formalised as a strategy around this period."

 

Harris, formerly a longtime rugby writer for The Australian, said when Graham Henry, Steve Hansen and Wayne Smith replaced Mitchell and Deans in 2004 they "they worked on improving the team's set-pieces, but they retained counter-attack".

 

He said the counter-attack concept had "infused every team in New Zealand from the National Provincial Championship to the All Blacks".

 

 

At first, Australians were contemptuous of the Kiwis' focus on counter-attack. They did not create anything, and were seen as parasites, feeding off mistakes. They are slow learners, the current generation of Australian coaches, and are finally acknowledging the value of attacking off turnover ball.

 

"But for the Kiwis it is instinctive, second nature, while Australians do not really feel it in their bones. When the All Blacks win a turnover they strike immediately, shifting the ball away from the contact point, while the Wallabies invariably hesitate, trying to decide whether to kick or run."

 

Harris said the Wallabies would have to master the art of the counterattack to have any hope of breaking their 16-year Bledisloe Cup drought.

Did the All Blacks' lethal use of the counter-attack, which produced this try for Beuden Barrett, stem from strategies John Mitchell introduced 16 years ago?

 

 - Stuff

 


JW
Just_winCaptain18,570 posts
30 Aug 2018, 14:14
#2
30 Aug 2018, 14:14#2
This is the first time I've heard this I have my doubts.
Mitchell's already quit the Bulls and is off to coach the English defense . He and White must be battling it out for the most contracts broken.
AU
AugenöffnerPro6,974 posts
30 Aug 2018, 18:10
#3
30 Aug 2018, 18:10#3

I doubt this too. To think he is a greater mind and contributor to All Black rugby than, say, Wayne Smith, its laughable. 

MO
moolaaPro2,380 posts
30 Aug 2018, 20:54
#4
30 Aug 2018, 20:54#4
JW, I think we can attribute the ABs all out attack ploy back to that infamous game vs Oz in Sydney(?) in 1994. Infamous for the Hollywood dive by Goldie in the last minute of the game in the act of scoring what would have been the match winning try only for Gregan to hit him and dislodge the ball! At half time Oz was way ahead and the ABs were devoid of any new ideas on how to break down their defence. Laurie Mains was credited with their sudden change to throw the ball around but rumour has it that it was Sean Fitzpatrick who gathered the troops around and said let’s just fire it around and see what happens! I dare say we’ll never know the exact truth except that if Goldie had just slid into the corner instead of his stupid aerial leap then we would have won the game. They then employed the same tactics which nearly won the 1995 RWC for us.
JW
Just_winCaptain18,570 posts
30 Aug 2018, 22:22
#5
30 Aug 2018, 22:22#5
Good post moola. I had heard it was Laurie Mains who freed up the NZ game. The fact is that I think this style of play was in the bones of most kiwis but repressed by the 60s forward dominance (10 man rugby). It didn’t take long for us the excell at counterattack strategies. Unlike some countries, lol
MO
MozartCaptain49,914 posts
31 Aug 2018, 05:50
#6
31 Aug 2018, 05:50#6
I think after the WC semi final where the Frogs like Dominici and Bernat-Salles showcased the art of counter attack was the moment the light bulb went off. It seemed whatever NZ did, moments later the Frogs were racing towards the AB line.
— END OF THREAD —

More from Rugby

More news