Official SharkBok Ratings: Hot off the Press
Congratulations to the All Blacks on a well-deserved victory. They executed their game plan effectively and controlled much of the match.
The Springboks, on the other hand, appeared rusty, which is understandable considering it was their first test of the year and playing against the All Blacks in New Zealand is always a challenging task.
Several players didn't perform up to the standard required for a starting position, indicating that some of the starters from the previous week were better options.
Those that have played themselves out of a starting position are crossed out.
Here is an assessment of the individual performances(after watching the match for the 1st time):
15. Willie le Roux - 6.5/10:
Le Roux missed some key tackles, which affected his overall performance.
The flat skip pass to Kolbe to score was excellent.
If he is injured in or before the world cup, it will be a big loss. I would rather put Adrense or Koble at XV than Willemse.
14. Cheslin Kolbe - 8/10:
Kolbe stood out as the most dangerous attacking player for the Springboks.
13. Lukhanyo Am -6/10:
Am had an "ok" game, probably one of his worst games.
12. Damian de Allende - 4/10:
De Allende's failure to field an up-and-under was disappointing, as was just about everything else he did. It is evident that he is no longer fit to be a starting player.
11. Makazole Mapimpi - 3/10:
Although the ball rarely reached Mapimpi's wing, he didn't make a significant impact. Ardense, with his all-around skills and contributions, appears to be a better choice. Mapimpi has played himself out of a starting position.
10. Damian Willemse - 6/10:
The backline seemed more effective on the attack when Libbock took over at 10.
Willemse is an excellent rugby player, but he is not a test standard flyhalf in big matches. Therefore, Libbock has earned a starting spot at flyhalf.
9. Faf de Klerk - 6/10:
De Klerk had an average performance and was outplayed by Williams. Although Williams is close to securing the starting position, Faf still remains the first-choice scrum-half- at least for now.
Faff needs time to start alongside Libbock to settle before the world cup.
8. Jasper Wiese - 4.5.10:
Wiese's work rate was relatively low. Vermeulen, with his all-around skills, is a more suitable starter in this position.
7. Franco Mostert - 4.5/10:
Steph Du Toit has proven to be a superior player, even though Mostert's form was solid at 7 last year.. Mostert no longer deserves a starting position.
6. Kwagga Smith - 6/10:
It's not clear whether Smith performed at his best, as the Bok breakdown was not great in the first half. He did get that amazing try at the end.
5. Lood de Jager - 3/10:
De Jager had a poor game, and it was evident that Synman performed much better when given the opportunity. Therefore, de Jager has played himself out of the starting team.
4. Eben Etzebeth (c) - 5/10:
Etzebeth had a relatively quiet game by his own standards.
3. Frans Malherbe - 4/10:
Malherbe didn't dominate the scrums and wasn't noticeable outside of that aspect of play.
2. Bongi Mbonambi - 4/10:
Mbonambi's poor throwing continues to be a concern. Marx should be the starting hooker, but it's important to have diversity in the front row.
1. Steven Kitshoff - 5/10:
Similar to Malherbe, Kitshoff didn't have a significant impact outside of scrums.
Substitutes:
16. Malcolm Marx - 7.5/10: Marx had a strong performance as usual.
17. Thomas du Toit - Not enough time to be rated.
18. Vincent Koch - Not enough time to be rated.
19. RG Snyman - 7/10: Snyman had a solid performance when he entered the game.
20. Pieter-Steph du Toit - 7.5/10: Du Toit showed his quality with an impressive performance.
21. Duane Vermeulen - 7/10: Vermeulen played well and showcased his abilities.
22. Grant Williams - 8/10: Williams had a notable game, with the only blemish being a mistake where he got isolated and stripped of the ball.
23. Manie Libbok - 7.5/10: The backline noticeably improved when Libbok joined the attack.
Overall, it is clear that some players from the previous week's starting lineup performed better than those in this match. Adjustments to the team composition should be considered based on these performances.
