Amla top scores in both innings.....
Trust you noted the number of balls he faced and the time spent at the wicket. I know it is not ODI but man is he a slug at the crease.
Kuhn needs to go, he is utterly useless, poor technique and another poor investment at 33, much like Cook was
Give the talented 22 year old Markram a go - nothing to lose and everything to gain
Status: Hall Of Fame
Posts: 15656 RE: Amla top scores in both innings.....
July 18, 2017, 12:13:17
Kuhn needs to go, he is utterly useless, poor technique and another poor investment at 33
Totally agree Dave
He has had his fair share of opportunities, and has never come close to producing the goods .
That confirms my statement that he was not consistent over the last year and although he makes good scores - like happened in the 2nd test over the past weekend - he was far too inconsistent previously.
I hope he continues with his performances in the remaining two tests - but am not confident that it will happen.
Mike
I am curious
What do you take into account when debating if a player like Amla should be dropped?
If any of my national players remained in the top 1 to 15 positions in the world rankings... year after year after year....., how would that equate to possibly dropping them if they dropped to 9 like Amla did.
Surely you would not consider dropping a player because he went from 1-2-3 in the world down to 9th?
If that is the criteria you use.... it is ludicrous.
This from the leering old fop who has a list of sportsmen he considers "pretty boys"!
Spot the irony!
My problem is he is inconsistent. Some good scores followed by poor ones. That is the reason for his drop in ratings as indicated above. The problem is when the low scores are more numerous than the high scores and that has been Amla's problem over the last year,
Unlike you my criterium for selection is PERFORMANCE - yours obviously is age and reputation.
My problem is he is inconsistent. Some good scores followed by poor ones. That is the reason for his drop in ratings as indicated above. The problem is when the low scores are more numerous than the high scores and that has been Amla's problem over the last year,
Unlike you my criterium for selection is PERFORMANCE - yours obviously is age and reputation.
Status: Hall Of Fame
Posts: 26939 RE: Amla top scores in both innings.....
July 20, 2017, 15:04:08 Let me explain something you lot do not understand. I never said Amla should be dropped - that is the first rubbish emanating as per normal from Mozart.
My problem is he is inconsistent. Some good scores followed by poor ones. That is the reason for his drop in ratings as indicated above. The problem is when the low scores are more numerous than the high scores and that has been Amla's problem over the last year,
Unlike you my criterium for selection is PERFORMANCE - yours obviously is age and reputation.
I think that is just common sense that his ratings will change Mike, we all knew he struggled a bit, but still, you make it even more confusing with your previous statement below.
Status: Hall Of Fame
Posts: 26939 RE: Amla top scores in both innings.....
July 20, 2017, 11:40:55That confirms my statement that he was not consistent over the last year
- he was far too inconsistent previously.
So he was not consistent......
Meaning what exactly?
What should.... or would.... you have done with Amla being so inconsistent?
I really think there is a problem with the openers - Elgar with his terrible technique - is OK - but not the ultimate answer. Cooke and Kuhn are not the answer. I would say the openers should be Markham and De Bruin. If they bat longer Amla would do better too - otherwise they should perhaps let him bat at 4 or 5.


