FIXTURESNo upcoming fixtures — check back soon.
FORUM / RUGBY /  Another bonus point erroneously awarded by yarpy ref...

Another bonus point erroneously awarded by yarpy ref...

Started by Brycy22 REPLIES414 VIEWS· 19 Mar 2014, 08:56
SHAREXFACEBOOKWHATSAPPTELEGRAMREDDITLINKEDIN
BR
BrycyPro4,671 posts
19 Mar 2014, 08:56
#1
19 Mar 2014, 08:56#1

Anyone keeping a tally on all these dodgy bonus points? Shameless these yarpy refs...Bean Brain, bRYCY KNOWS A DODGY REF WHEN HE SEES ONE MATE...

 

No skin off my nose as the SA franchises need all the help they can get if they are to compete in the end with the Mighty Chiefs..

 

Just to recap though - Round one saw a bonus point erroneously gifted to the Sharkies with Cobus Reinach's no try..

 

Now referees boss Lyndon Bray has admitted again match officials got it wrong in both of the Blues' recent defeats in South Africa.

 

Bray also said the try awarded to Bulls front rower Marcel van der Merwe, which earned his team a bonus point in the 38-22 victory in Pretoria, should not have been scored as it was a clear double movement.

 

In what is a unique initiative, Bray today posted his explanations of several recent contentious rulings on the Sanzar website.

 

Among the clips provided, and his comments, is an explanation as to why the try to van Wyk, scored after Charles Piutau knocked the ball from midfielder Deon van Rensburg's grasp, should not have been awarded.

In his ruling, Bray said: "Lions #13 [van Rensburg] is carrying the ball and about to attempt to score a try. Blues #11 [Piutau] effects a tackle and Lions #13 loses possession as a result.

 

While the Blues player does jolt the ball out of his possession, he is not trying to deliberately `rip the ball' out of the player's possession. The onus is on the ball carrier to maintain possession while being tackled. Therefore, this should have been ruled as a knock on and subsequently, no try.'

 

Bean Brain yr refs need a lesson from the Kiwi

CL
clevermikeCoach57,555 posts
19 Mar 2014, 09:09
#2
19 Mar 2014, 09:09#2
 Brycy
Every referee has made mistakes in his life - but nobody can equal the mistakes by New Zealand referees - by far the worst bunch in history of the game.   Some NZ referees have been crooked - Paddy O'Brien and Bryce Lawrence being two of those.  Some have just been incompetent.   So make your choice in which category the NZ refs  falls.  

BR
BrycyPro4,671 posts
19 Mar 2014, 09:21
#3
19 Mar 2014, 09:21#3
...not so Clevermike am still waiting for you to announce the winner of the 6 Nations superbru tipping competition that you hosted...there's a good sport......christmas is coming mate... 
try to van wyk was rubbish, have no idea how berry could have found that ok.

try to tom marshall was also rubbish, IMO that was a clear knock on before he scooped it up to score.

take joubert out of the equation and saffa refs are no better or worse then the kiwi refs, its not corrupt issue, its a competency issue.

but SA being a proud rugby nation they are and always getting pwned by NZ rugby, are always going to sccumb to the usual baby wawa boohoos, cos thats what helps them sleep at night.

i always wonder if NZ were as bad as the SA at rugby on all levels, would the bulk of kiwi rugby fans be just as pathetic as the bulk of the saffa rugby fans???
sadly we will never know, cos NZ rugby dosent look like waning. at least not in the foreseeable future,
"Perhaps it is time to have a person available to review these calls by the TMO prior to awarding tries or penalties that determine the outcome of close contests."
Oh I see, a TMO reviewer? Then you can get someone to police the TMO reviewer . . . and then of course you'll need a supervisor to keep an eye on the policeman who is reviewing the TMO . . . and a watchdog who makes sure that the supervisor who is keeping an eye on the TMO reviewer doesn't slip up . . . and then . . . 
Please man! None of this is necessary if crybabies like you just accept that even the the excellent refs that we do have do make mistakes on occasion. They're human but they're the most competent and best qualified humans to do the job. If you have to refer every decision to a TMO who in turn is "reviewed" by someone else again and so on then we're going to end up watching nothing but replay after replay of every single tiny incident. I'd much rather watch a game of good old fashioned rugby thank you very much. 
All jokes aside, perhaps you should be looking for a new sport to watch, Arthur John?
— END OF THREAD —

More from Rugby

More news