FIXTURESNo upcoming fixtures — check back soon.
FORUM / RUGBY /  Auge Ratings: SCO vs RSA (EOYT 2018)

Auge Ratings: SCO vs RSA (EOYT 2018)

Started by Augenöffner7 REPLIES538 VIEWS· 18 Nov 2018, 12:17
SHAREXFACEBOOKWHATSAPPTELEGRAMREDDITLINKEDIN
AU
AugenöffnerPro6,974 posts
18 Nov 2018, 12:17
#1
18 Nov 2018, 12:17#1

Ratings 

  1. Kitshoff - 7.5
  2. Marx - 7.0
  3. Malherbe - 6.0
  4. Snyman - 7.5
  5. Mostert - 7.0
  6. Kolisi - 6.5
  7. Du Toit - 6.0
  8. Vermeulen - 6.0
  9. Papier - 6.0
  10. Pollard - 8.0
  11. Dyantyi - 6.0
  12. De Allende - 5.0
  13. Kriel - 5.5
  14. Nkosi - 5.8
  15. Le Roux - 6.0
  16. Mbonami - 6.5
  17. T Du Toit - 6.5
  18. Koch - 6.0
  19. De Jager - 5.5
  20. Louw - 6.0
  21. Van Zyl - 0.0
  22. Jantjies - 6.0
  23. Kolbe - 6.0

In the build up to the game, numerous Scottish blogs and sites regarded our centres as an advantage for South Africa. One wonders how that could be, our media working it's magic across its borders. Our centres were dominated, again. Kriel had a period where he a couple of lively runs early on, but overall, they looked toothless. Damian is developing a new habit of allowing runners to run passed him, even if they run across the face of him. There was a Scottish attack from a kick where they broke along the blindside, along the touchline, Damian was in place to pressure the receiver of that kick but let him go. This was close to being a try. Of course, these are things which aren't revealed in the stats.
Papier had a better game than I expected. Some weak defence, and one poor box kick, but was generally accurate, with good service. I don't care much for his sniping around the fringes. Good support for the first try. Looked alert. 
Snyman had an immense game. Powerful, dynamic and excellent hands linking up for that try. One of the best Boks on the day.
Kitshoff dominating Nel was one of the keys to turning the screw on Scotland. He was good in everything he did. 
Pollard was arguably the best Bok on the field. His game management was superb. He is looking more and more dominant with each passing week. Jantjies is clearly outclassed by him. Without Pollard, this would probably have been an even closer game. 
Some issues with Nkosi. Some weak defence and weak moments in contact. Kolbe added more bite when he replaced Nkosi, a running theme of the tour.
This is Kolisi's only good game on tour. He was much improved, particularly on defence, where he also pressured the Scots into errors at the breakdown. 

CL
clevermikeCoach57,555 posts
18 Nov 2018, 14:47
#2
18 Nov 2018, 14:47#2

AO

What game did you watch?  The props were both substituted at minute 58 - normal process.   two minutes later Snyman was subbed. The props both had a slight advantage over the opposition.   After the subs and the change at lock - the situation changed drastically.

Why should that happen?   Not because the starting props were weaker.  It was because Snyman - a weak scrummager - was replaced by  stronger one.   Just think what will happen of another strong scrummager replace powder-puff Mostert.     Yet despite weak tackles and the players tackled back - which you obviously rate highly - was stronger in execution.

Just another thing - why did Snyman not jump in the front of the line-outs?    He missed one line-out on own throw and was placed further back in the line-outs and Du Toit brought to the front - where on the first Scottish throw-in he took a line-out from the Scots.  

Wonderful how you missed all the above and then make ratings.   It went straight over your head as per normal.   

 

AU
AugenöffnerPro6,974 posts
18 Nov 2018, 18:47
#3
18 Nov 2018, 18:47#3

Our scrum was dominating Scotland from the very first scrum. You lose. 

He moved as the lineout formation dictates. 

Powder puff? Look no further than Lood. Very weak carrier, maybe he has trouble generating momentum because of his slow limbs. Either way, he is of no consequence. 

DB
DbDraadCaptain26,388 posts
18 Nov 2018, 20:31
#4
18 Nov 2018, 20:31#4

Auge, Mosterdt wasn't better than PSDT....Vermeulen and Papier were 7's too. Mosterdt a 6.5 at best. He got carried back in contact and I didn't see one dominant tackle from him... powder puff stuff indeed. 

AU
AugenöffnerPro6,974 posts
18 Nov 2018, 20:59
#5
18 Nov 2018, 20:59#5

Papier was too weak on defence. Several issues prevent him from receiving a higher grade. 

Steph had about 5 tackles where he rushed out the line and caught the carrier behind the advantage line. Nothing else stood out. Mostert tackled more, making fewer errors. Better all round game. 

Duane didn't do as much as those who I rated a 7. Was good, not great. In fact, he hasn't been a standout Bok on tour. 

sharkbok
sharkbokCaptain23,253 posts
18 Nov 2018, 21:08
#6
18 Nov 2018, 21:08#6
I was happy with Papier's performance. He is nippy at the base of the ruck and has a decent quick pass. I think he should be 2nd choice pushing Faff. The other 2 donkeys can be discarded for the next promising 9 in Superugby. 
MO
MozartCaptain49,914 posts
18 Nov 2018, 22:03
#7
18 Nov 2018, 22:03#7
I think Vermeulen was a 7. Kriel was a 5. Allende was at best a 4. Dyantyi was a 5.
AU
AugenöffnerPro6,974 posts
19 Nov 2018, 00:55
#8
19 Nov 2018, 00:55#8

Dyantyi definitely had some poor moments. Our wings have struggled in general on this tour. Dyantyi being particularly vulnerable under the high ball. Thus far, we really haven't brought either wing into the game much. What ball they've had has often been in cramped areas where they need to chip or grubber to get behind the defence. We aren't creating space.

I'll review Duane. He made some strong tackles. He did carry a lot of ball. All of which was secure. I think he won a turnover or a breakdown penalty. I want to look for that. Maybe I'm being too harsh on him. 

— END OF THREAD —

More from Rugby

More news