FIXTURESNo upcoming fixtures — check back soon.
FORUM / RUGBY /  Aussies deserved to win the quarter-final

Aussies deserved to win the quarter-final

Started by hudrickit22 REPLIES286 VIEWS· 01 Feb 2012, 02:00
SHAREXFACEBOOKWHATSAPPTELEGRAMREDDITLINKEDIN
HU
hudrickitNewbie5 posts
01 Feb 2012, 05:52
#1
01 Feb 2012, 05:52#1

 Hi, I'm new to the forum. Hud Rickit, the name and I support the mighty Crusaders and the All Blacks. It was good to see another country bleat so loudly about the referee's performamnce in a World Cup. Agreed, it was Bryce Lawrence's worst referee-ing performance and that's saying something. But it's not what lost SA the game. Pocock was cheating and was alllowed to the the ref, right in front of their posts, yes, yes, I know. But what cost SA the game and a chance at the mighty All Blacks, was that you had SO MUCH possession but didn't know what to do with it. That comes down to not changing the style of rugby played since the 2007 cup. That, and keeping aging stars like John Smit on well past their used by date.

Bring on the Super 15.

Hud Rickit

DE
DennyCaptain12,893 posts
01 Feb 2012, 07:52
#2
01 Feb 2012, 07:52#2

Hi Hudrickit and welcome aboard. It's healthy to hear the "view from the other side of the fence" and  if you have any mates interested in joining us, we'd love to hear from them.

Have to disagree(guess it won't be the last time either hahahaha) with your header. I was at that game and I bumped into an Ozzie afterwards, in his words Pocok's transgressions were embarrassing and our possession was nullified by his cheating. True, we held onto Smit for far too long, Bismark made a huge difference when he came on and I daresay Habana should also have been replaced a whole lot earlier.

The combination of an inept referree and the cheating Pocok plus an over the hill John Smit colluded to bring about the Bok's demise. The Boks would have been a tougher proposition for the AB's than the Wannabees.

BE
Beeno1Captain40,032 posts
01 Feb 2012, 10:34
#3
01 Feb 2012, 10:34#3

A heary welcome rickity, but not an auspicous start!.

You may recall the Boks lost by one point. BL robbed them blind and had a fair competent ref been on the park we would have won comfortably by 20 odd points.

Whatever our failings we were by far the better side and only a disgusting display by nz ref of the year BL prevented a comprehensive Bok win. We played moe than enough rugby to beat an badly outclassed oz side.

Dont come with this rubbish that a ref can rob you blind but you must look to your own failings when in any event you lose bya point!!! That is absolutely illogical. We were mor ethan good enough on the dy t owin at a canter.

BL should be banned and there should have been an investigation. The abs were booted out of the previous wc because of one forward pass  - we had to endure far far more than that so don't even try t oequate the two situations. This was naked robbery. Then to make BL nz ref of the year after a display like that  - well the mind boggles at nz behaviour!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Win at any cost!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

A very curious stat is this. Duting the 2011 tri nations the abs got 1 yellow for every 43 penalties. OZ got 1 yellow for 7 every penalties and the Boks got 1 yellow for every 6 penalties. In the final we saw our Craig Joubert hand the wc to the out classed abs - so we are also at fault here. The stats I show clearly indicate both oz and SA  refs favour nz sides. What else can explain such an outrageous difference.

No the wc was a total farce and one nz should never have won. An average Fog side showed how they were ready for the taking. Get the Japies prevailed.  Bok would have given the abs a  hiding in final and the abs knew this. Well done BL nz ref of the year!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! 

 

 

 

 

 

TE
TeraNovaNewbie3 posts
01 Feb 2012, 10:38
#4
01 Feb 2012, 10:38#4

 I live in Queenswood - so it's Reds for me.  New here like hudrickit.  I don't want to say much at this stage, still trying to catch-up.  But I see some hatred and some really non-rugby nonsense.  Who gives Denny the right to call people names and then request them to participate, bit two faced Japie woh does not even live in his own counrty.

 

As for the game - cry all you want!  You play the game and there is an official who will officiate the game - We won fair and square.  To cry now is typical of losers. Lets debate RUGBY and leave the name calling and ref blaming out of it - it smacks of an ill upbringing if you ask me.

US
UsernamePro1,098 posts
01 Feb 2012, 10:38
#5
01 Feb 2012, 10:38#5

South Africa didn't know what to do with that possession? This seems to be the best anti-South Africans came conjour up. Simply put together a retort that is based on a rather limited perception that the Boks cannot play attacking rugby. Sadly that has been enough to deflect attention from what is clear indication of corruption in the game. Allow me to share with you some facts of that game.

South Africa Statistics

Possession: 67%
Territory: 75%
Clean Breaks: 1
Defenders Beaten: 13
Offloads: 17
Rucks Won: 115 from 128% (89%)
Turnovers Conceded: 24

Lineouts Won: 14 own ball; 5 Aussie ball

It is very clear from these stats that the Boks were in actual fact running rampant here. Bryce not only impeded the Boks from being able to retain the ball at the breakdown; very specifically he haulted the Bok attack in Australia's 22. He used his influence as ref to eleviate pressure in the Aussie 22. When the Boks broke the line and scored tries they were wiped off the board. In all 21 GUARANTEED points were taken from the Boks in those three tries alone! I terms of tries and penalties alone from pressure in Aussie 22... well, it's patently obvious that the Boks were easily denied in excess of over 30 points in that game. The only area of the game the Boks failed to dominate was the breakdown battle in key phases.

Here are some stats on Genia, Cooper, McCabe et Ashley-Cooper to show how they fared in that game:

09.Will Genia
Kick/Pass/Run: 13/40/3
Metres Run: 5
CB/DB/OL: 0/0/2

10.Quade Cooper
Kick/Pass/Run: 13/9/7
Metres Run: 28
CB/DB/OL: 0/0/0 (Clean Breaks; Defenders Beaten; Offloads)

12.McCabe
Kick/Pass/Run: 1/0/2
Metres Run: 9
CB/DB/OL: 0/0/1

13.Adam Ashley-Cooper
Kick/Pass/Run: 0/0/0
Metres Run: 0
CB/DB/OL: 0/0/0

Quite clearly the Boks succeeded in completely nillifying the core of Australia's threat. As I've said before, Australia are very frail to physicality and cannot impose themselves if you cut down their space. The Boks finally, under Nienabers excellence, took heed of Australia's humiliating losses over the previous few years and stuffed them. Here are South Africa's backline stats in contrast to the above:

09.Du Preez
Kick/Pass/Run: 8/112/8
Metres Run: 35
CB/DB/OL: 0/0/2

10.Morne Steyn
Kick/Pass/Run: 13/36/1
Metres Run: 0
CB/DB/OL: 0/0/1

12.Jean De Villiers
Kick/Pass/Run: 1/4/12
Metres Run: 77
CB/DB/OL: 1/3/2

13.Jaque Fourie
Kick/Pass/Run: 0/3/8
Metres Run: 8
CB/DB/OL: 0/2/2

So we can safely conclude that the Boks backline not only succeeded in defensive brilliance but in actual fact outclassed their opponents ball in hand. The only facet of play that the Boks stuttered in was the breakdown. This is the key area that cost the Boks the game. It allowed Australia to alleviate pressure and clear their lines many times. Despite the Boks being hindered by this they still broke Australia thrice and managed to completely dominate them. But for the points wiped off the scoreboard the Boks would have won this game by over 30 clear points. That much is a conservative valuation.

To conclude I would like to take a brief moment to address New Zealand's 2007 exit from the World Cup. New Zealand were matched in all areas of play and were unable to mentally subdue and defeat their opponents. They were by no means beaten by the ref, nor a forward pass, but an overlap that had one Frenchman clear through. Here is something to take into consideration before responding to this.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=box08lq9ylg





 

TE
TeraNovaNewbie3 posts
01 Feb 2012, 10:44
#6
01 Feb 2012, 10:44#6

 And another ref blamer - God but you bunch are funny.  Beeno1 where do you live?  Are you a qualified rugby ref?  If not then you are not qualified to make such a silly statement.  All you are doing is making a mockery out of yourself, your team and your country.  The team with the most points win - end of story.  Being a cry baby is not going to help one little bit.  If we or the New Zee's kick your silly buts again, will you blame the referee again?  Maybe you always blamed the teachers for your performance and your mommy supported you - noe it perpetuates.  Grow-up!  Learn to lose with dignity.  Stop the name calling!

 

PS: Site Admin - this name calling is nonsense and lowers the standard of the board.

US
UsernamePro1,098 posts
01 Feb 2012, 10:53
#7
01 Feb 2012, 10:53#7

Did you not call for a debate? Have I not responded to that call? If you do not like the "name calling" then stop responding to it. I have given you more than enough to handle as it is. So kindly take the time to read and respond to my post so this debate, as you lot demanded, can proceed.

DE
DennyCaptain12,893 posts
01 Feb 2012, 11:13
#8
01 Feb 2012, 11:13#8

TeraNova

How does Queenswood relate to the Reds.....from my understanding Queenswood is in Western Australia.

Furthermore, you seem to know a quite a bit about me, thanks, it's nice to know there's someone out there taking an interest  Bwhahahaha and by the way, I'm not a Japie Bwhhahahahaha

 

But as for Bryce Lawrence, funny, correction, very funny that you find nothing wrong with him even though by his own admission and that of Lyndon Bray he was inept and it's been accepted that he will have to prove himself. And talking about losing respect, where's yours if you justify Pocok's cheating?

Mate, you come across as a blusterbum but hey I'm open to correction.

BE
Beeno1Captain40,032 posts
01 Feb 2012, 11:16
#9
01 Feb 2012, 11:16#9

Brilliant post Card. I see Nova has no counter and has resorted to bombast.  He comes on here swinging left and right like a loonie and complains immedialtely to admin. Hahahahahahhahaha what a whinger - grow up please - admin is not vaguely interested in your whining.

At least the Ozzies fired that crooked ref Marks who destroyed the Sharks season last year. Why didn't nz do likewise to BL - but no they make him nz ref of the year!!!!!!!!. Telling us BL froze, had a very bad day, admits his blunder etc etc doesn't help - the WC is in nz and illegaly so. BL is a very experienced and qualified ref. How good do you have to be to see the at least five hands in rucks in the oz twenty two?

Of course honest rugby folk are going to protest we want fair competent refs!

I will also add I did say at the time nz should have won but for that forward pass being allowed in the 2007 WC (And boy did NZ raise an outcry). Now that is what a fair minded person does. But to equate one error to what happened under BL is plain stupid. This was naked robbery at its ver yworst. Worse even than when Honiss told the Smit to have a chat to the team and then let ireland go and score while they were having said chat. Later he apologised for his error. Oh great stuff. Worse I say because of the numerous blunders by BL.

The Boks dominated Oz like seldom before. On this form the abs would have had no chance. Man the average French, under a decent ref, would have won comfortably. So we are also implicated here.

 

 

 

 

BE
Beeno1Captain40,032 posts
01 Feb 2012, 11:23
#10
01 Feb 2012, 11:23#10

Denny there is a fair chance nova is a SS mole bent on causing ruptions here. Has given the game away by knowing about you? Hahahahahhahahahahahaha

I just wish these guys had the courage to post under their SS board names.  Seems they miss us terribly and have to come here to get their butts kickced! Bwaahahahhahahaha

DE
DennyCaptain12,893 posts
01 Feb 2012, 11:25
#11
01 Feb 2012, 11:25#11

Beeno

It seems like we have a live one here!.....fancy calling for a debate with no facts to support and when the facts are supplied  he starts name calling and then screeches off to the Mod. Let me not be mad sweet heaven, let me not be mad! Gotta luv it!!!

DE
DennyCaptain12,893 posts
01 Feb 2012, 11:32
#12
01 Feb 2012, 11:32#12

 

"Denny there is a fair chance nova is a SS mole bent on causing ruptions here. Has given the game away by knowing about you? Hahahahahhahahahahahaha

I just wish these guys had the courage to post under their SS board names.  Seems they miss us terribly and have to come here to get their butts kickced! Bwaahahahhahahaha"

Yes well, it's game over red rover, he gave himself up when he said I'm from South Africa not living in my own country. Just how dumb are these Supersupporter jackasses? Bwhahahahaha

 

BE
Beeno1Captain40,032 posts
01 Feb 2012, 11:35
#13
01 Feb 2012, 11:35#13

Hahahahahahahahahaha it was probably dorkie dumbo at a guess! 

I seriously think they miss us terribly and wish we were back!

DE
DennyCaptain12,893 posts
01 Feb 2012, 11:46
#14
01 Feb 2012, 11:46#14

Yep, they certainly miss us, on the contrary we don't miss them Bwhahahahahaha I think you might be right about them wishing us back with them! Wow That's painfully hilarious as well!!

 

TE
TeraNovaNewbie3 posts
01 Feb 2012, 12:01
#15
01 Feb 2012, 12:01#15

 Hell, you are a funny lot - seems you come from the same place.

 

As for name calling:  I really hope more of me mates read this:

 

Denny 
Member
Posts: 92 RE: It's not true....
January 26, 2012, 14:28:17

If a SAFFA  Ref had committed the same then all Hell would cut loose. Remember how they castigated Kaplan for supposedly having a bad game?  Damn Kiwis are at their best minding sheep......it's that simple. You can't have knuckledragging cretins running the show. Anyone who's been to that sheep crapping Island station called NZ will tell you it's like living proof out of the movie Deliverance.

As for the rest I have no idea what the croc you lot are on about - 

Zaibatsu, I have not had the time to read or digest your piece, you seem like the sane one here - i'll get back at you.

 

DE
DennyCaptain12,893 posts
01 Feb 2012, 12:11
#16
01 Feb 2012, 12:11#16

Poor effort ou Firetwit. You gave yourself up with (A) Queenswood.....try Queensland (B)  knowing my personal details. Allup another failed attempt by a Supersupporter mole to discredit me. Climb back in your hole....go-on it's game over Bwhahahahahahaha

 

BE
Beeno1Captain40,032 posts
01 Feb 2012, 12:48
#17
01 Feb 2012, 12:48#17

Denny you are most likely right about it being firetwit.  Can't be 100% sure though as these twits will not reveal themselves. Its all undercover stuff with them.
 

However nova has blown it and can't explain how he knows all this about you.

Do tell nova or is it, as Denny says,  firetwit?  Queenwood - bwahahahahahahahahaha

 

DE
DennyCaptain12,893 posts
01 Feb 2012, 13:16
#18
01 Feb 2012, 13:16#18

I'm only surprised that ou Firetwit isn't accompanied by his mate, ruckingflanker.

Queensland = Reds supporter

Queenswood = Western Force supporter

Wipe the egg from your stupid face, Firetwit.

SA
Saffolk Captain30,741 posts
02 Feb 2012, 03:45
#19
02 Feb 2012, 03:45#19

 Yeah and carrots grown on trees

HU
hudrickitNewbie5 posts
02 Feb 2012, 04:24
#20
02 Feb 2012, 04:24#20

 To der Aristokrat, yes some good points. I still believe that the last four years of SA test rugby were let down by a buffoon of a coach and a failure to meld SA power rugby along with some more enterprising back play. With great centres and wings, it is unfortunate they don't see much of the ball. Habana only seems to get his hands on it if he intercepts the pill.

With regards to Bryce Lawrence, he has admitted to having a shocker. I agree that SA shoulda/coulda won & that Aussie defence crossed the line into cheating. But that is rugby, every team plays to the ref, and SA is not lily white on that! The key is to adapt, & I think you missed Bakkies Botha simply dealing with Pocock's infringing. & Beeno's stats, if accurate, are intriguing but show that ABs play to the edge of the law better than SA - i.e. smarter!

Final comment wrt the vitriol. I agree with TeraNova wholeheartedly. The attacks are personal and mindless, why attack a typo for goodness sake. btw, Denny, where you live doesn't equal who you support, so what is this about egg on face? Some growing up is needed because this is juvenile stuff and reflects poorly on SA supporters if it is indicative, an element which enables the sweeping generalisation that SA rugby supporters are boorish. So, even though I've only just signed up after being invited, I can quickly see that I'm in the wrong company. Life is too short to waste my time here. 

So until 2015 - "4 more years..." as Gregan once said.

US
UsernamePro1,098 posts
02 Feb 2012, 08:12
#21
02 Feb 2012, 08:12#21

New Zealand are not smarter, they merely preferred. It's quite clear what they are doing. Did you not notice Joubert LITERALLY turn a blind eye to New Zealand in the final. He literally made an effort not to see a lot of what they were doing. Very uncharacteristic. The stats Beeno posted are very accurate. I researched them in 2010 as well. Here's a link I want you to watch. And I want you to honestly tell me that the Boks would have gotten away with even one of these illegal tactics. Tell me how it's just the way things go that one team has an enormous advantage in playing outside the laws.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pdr-W775hk4
 

GR
greenfeverNewbie7 posts
03 Feb 2012, 09:29
#22
03 Feb 2012, 09:29#22

An inept ref was not the only reason we lost the game.A combination of Pocock's cheating and the Boks inability to finish of their chances were contributing factors.

With all the possesion and silly mistakes like knocking the ball forward with a try beckoning the Boks have only half a right to be peeved.The game was theirs to win despite everything conspiring against them.Simply....they blew it.

Anyway memories are too painful so this is my last comment on THAT game.Lets move forward.Exciting times ahead with HM as the new coach.Can't wait for the Poms in june.

BL
Bryce Lawrence Rookie50 posts
06 Feb 2012, 13:06
#23
06 Feb 2012, 13:06#23

...all and all i thought it was a very good game and the best team won on the day.

— END OF THREAD —

More from Rugby

More news