Baby Boks

Ive been analysing the game for 2 days.
I came to the following conclusion...
the baby boks lost because england scored more points.

Well done Chippo....you are spot on. But I wonder, were there younger players available? These old men of 20 are over the hill. Surely there were some sixteen or seventeen year old players the bloody stupid coaches could have selected Dave?

 LOL nice one Chip.
Love your insight.

I wonder what would have happened if the junior bokke had scores more points.

 Snapter some oaks are so simple they actually believe ref decisions have no impact on the game. 
So incorrect yellows mean nothing as do reds eg Bissie. Incorrect penalties mean nothing etc etc. The mind boggles at the simplicty of some oaks!  
Reffing one sides mistakes and not the other won't have any effect. 
Bring back Bryce Lawrence and Marks of OZ. These guys can't possibly negatively effect a game. The abs were never kicked out of a RWC by a forward pass. The refs always get it right there is no bias and everyhthing is as clean as a whistle. When I speak of refs I include the TMOs what shockers recently. How do they get these things wrong???
I am sure these same folk believe in fairies, father christmas and the man in the moon!!!
ou chipped ou is a veritable genius!

Wow Chippo you are so fucking funny  

 Thanks Saf
Seems that you, flash, beeno and moz all agree for once .
Imagine how funny it would be if you and I combined...
My humour with your looks...

Ok before i start an argument, im just messing bud.
It also confused me how the babies lost that game.
Guess we should also be asking then how Wales lost on Saturday.

 the baby boks lost because england scored more points.