MOMozart
Captain49,914 posts
MOMozartCaptain49,914 posts
28 Jul 2019, 18:26#9
The usual Stephanie hype:
F MostertL 1 10 0 0.
K SmithFL 0 15 1 0.
P ToitFL 1 14 3 0.
D VermeulenN8 2 11 2 0.
.......
F MostertL 0 2 9 5 0 0 0 0.
K SmithFL 0 2 8 26 0 2 0 0.
P ToitFL 0 0 3 2 0 0 0 0.
D VermeulenN8 0 0 10 19 0 0 0 0.
.......
Kwagga more tackles at a higher success rate and 13 times the metres Stephanie produced. Vermeulen 10 times the metres Stephanie produced. Mostert won all his lineouts and made all his tackles not 80% of them like Stephanie.
This is truly sickening. A bog ordinary game in which he lost a lineout, missed three tackles, failed to turnover any ball even though he had opportunities and made 2 metres is being written up as the second coming by the press.
Dishonest press and dumb fans. Big engine......low horsepower.
MOMozart
Captain49,914 posts
MOMozartCaptain49,914 posts
28 Jul 2019, 20:24#13
Vermeulen never had a great game......and nobody is out there saying he was our best forward. Unlike The Stephanistas who are promoting garbage.
After about 30 minutes somebody on the live match string asked what was wrong with the du Toit.....because to that point he had been awol. He improved as the match went on and had a decent game, but certainly nothing special.
MOMozart
Captain49,914 posts
MOMozartCaptain49,914 posts
29 Jul 2019, 00:21#15
So much work but mediocre stats......oh I forgot, stats aren't reliable, bias is. HasBeen in a different set of circumstances you would be pulling for the squad. Get real!
MOMozart
Captain49,914 posts
MOMozartCaptain49,914 posts
29 Jul 2019, 05:44#17
I gave all the stats for the loosies and threw in Mostert as a comparable player.....all the stats.
So tell me dimwit, what stats have I left out and which interpretation was distorted. The floor is your's. Have at it, but stay on this specific subject..