FIXTURESNo upcoming fixtures — check back soon.
FORUM / RUGBY /  Blues accept gifts to beat Cheetahs; Rugby 365

Blues accept gifts to beat Cheetahs; Rugby 365

Started by Just_win6 REPLIES119 VIEWS· 22 Mar 2014, 23:34
SHAREXFACEBOOKWHATSAPPTELEGRAMREDDITLINKEDIN
JW
Just_winCaptain18,570 posts
22 Mar 2014, 23:34
#1
22 Mar 2014, 23:34#1

The Blues put their Super Rugby campaign back on track with a bonus-point 40-30 win over the Cheetahs in Auckland on Saturday.

In a game that will have the refereeing bosses scrambling for the law books and some explanations of the weirdness that transpired at Eden Park, the Blues accepted a couple of gifts from the referee and a host from the Cheetahs, who paid the price for their own erroneous ways.

The Cheetahs will also be concerned about the wrist injury that caused flyhalf Johan Goosen to leave the field midway through the first half, which happened when a Blues player stood on his arm. He left straight after the match for scans.

However, the biggest problem to come out of this game was the numerous brain explosions by the man with the whistle.

Argentinean referee Francisco Pastrana's influence should not be discounted - he first made a controversial yellow card call against the Cheetahs and while being a man down the visitors conceded two tries, one of which was even more controversial than the yellow card.

The TMO, Glenn Newman of New Zealand, ruled that the player had illegally propelled himself forward in an attempt to ground the ball. Pastrana, despite getting a clear call from the TMO, still awarded the try, saying he was 'happy' with the grounding.

The Argentinean was not alone causing chaos on the field, with a number of silly penalties and sloppy handling errors contributing to spoiling what was at times an entertaining spectacle.

The Cheetahs were presented with the first real scoring opportunity, when the Blues were penalised at a ruck/tackle situation inside their 22 - Luke Braid the culprit. Johan Goosen made no mistake - 3-0 after four minutes.

However, almost straight from the restart the Cheetahs were penalised at a tackle, Caylib Oosthuizen not using his arms, and Simon Hickey levelled the scores.

Then Braid was penalised for being in front of the kicker and Goosen restored the three-point lead, before the Cheetahs committed obstruction at the restart and Hickey levelled the scores again (6-all after 10 minutes) - as the tit-for-tat penalty game continued.

The first try came in the 17th minute - Steven Luatua going over from close range, after a few phases, when a Cheetahs line-out inside their 22 went horribly wrong. Hickey's conversion made it 13-6.

And the Cheetahs hit straight back, a succession of penalties against the home team and a warning from the referee, allowed the Cheetahs to maul it over from five metres out - Johannes Prinsloo getting the armchair ride. Goosen made it 13-all.

That was soon followed by the first yellow card of the match, as Prinsloo was penalised for what the referee determined to be a professional foul - although television replays proved inconclusive as to what exactly his transgression was.

The penalty feast continued, with referee Francisco Pastrana ruling against the Cheetahs scrum and Hickey slotting the goal-kick.

Then the referee produced the biggest shocker of the match - ruling that a try should stand, despite the MO telling him that the player had propelled himself forward, illegally, with his knees. George Moala was the player who dotted down.

Willie le Roux compounded the Cheetahs' misery by putting down a simple ball and Tevita Li accepted the gift five points. Hickey kicked both conversions to make it 30-13.

The Cheetahs managed to secure a late penalty in the first half, Elgar Watts, on for the injured Johan Goosen, slotted the goal-kick to narrow the gap to 16-30 at the break.

The referee's confusing calls continued after the break, with both teams struggling to come to terms with his version of the rules.

Not that it seemed to bother the Cheetahs, with Cornel Hendriks scoring after a brilliant set-piece move deep inside their half that saw the Sevens Springbok drift into space and then step the cover. Watts added the extras to make it a seven-point game (23-30), with just under 20 to go.

However, Blues prop Tony Woodcock flopped over from a metre out after another powerful scrum - the bonus point secured for the Blues. Hickey's conversion made it a 14-point game (37-23) with 15 minutes remaining.

Again the Cheetahs came back, a patient build-up that started inside their half exposed the Blues out wide - where Ma'a Nonu looked very ponderous - and Hennie Daniller scored the Cheetahs' third try. Watts made it 30-37.

Hickey restored some sanity with a penalty in the 72nd minute, making it 40-30.

The Cheetahs kept hammering away, looking for a couple of bonus points and some consolation, but their hands kept letting them down.

It was ironic that the referee, Pastrana, finished the game by getting in the way and touching the ball while the Cheetahs attempted to launch one last desperate raid.

The Blues will celebrate a deserved win, gifted wrapped by a number of factors in one of the strangest games of the season.

Man of the match: Amidst all the chaos caused by the referee's weird rulings, there was some quality among the players. Willie le Roux attempted desperately to inject himself into the game in the second half and managed to get a few line-breaks that helped the visitors get back into the game. Our award goes toBlues loose forward Steven Luatua, the most impressive among those putting their bodies about, while he also secured some vital turnovers.

JW
Just_winCaptain18,570 posts
22 Mar 2014, 23:38
#2
22 Mar 2014, 23:38#2
Well this article will get certain members of the forum on a rant. However, the ref was pretty bad in this game. He may well have effected the outcome but there were mistakes by the players that had an impact on the game also.
Let's see if the ref oversight system works. We will see what actions are taken.
HA
hakwaPro4,146 posts
23 Mar 2014, 05:48
#3
23 Mar 2014, 05:48#3
 That ref in the Force vs Chiefs game was the 2nd WORST I have ever seen (Barnes being the worst in the 2007 RWC)
I hope the Force get their just deserts in the weeks to come. Sorry to say this but I hate their guts more the way they celebrated after their win.
JW
Just_winCaptain18,570 posts
23 Mar 2014, 09:11
#4
23 Mar 2014, 09:11#4
Teams that rub a win in the face of the teams they beat are just asking for trouble. They will get their compupence as Homer Simpson often said, lol
MD
Monkey D LuffyPro6,277 posts
23 Mar 2014, 10:04
#5
23 Mar 2014, 10:04#5
u would think that with a kiwi TMO saying no try and a puma ref making the controversial decision to overrule, that it might gain a little favour with the saffa tinfoil brigrade, but read the comments on the live thread for a good laugh, :oD

but regarding this bit in the article about moalas try,,,
"The TMO, Glenn Newman of New Zealand, ruled that the player had illegally propelled himself forward in an attempt to ground the ball. Pastrana, despite getting a clear call from the TMO, still awarded the try, saying he was 'happy' with the grounding."
pastrana couldnt hear the TMOs call as he was having problems with earpiece, and he ended up asking the touchie what the the TNO said.
i get the feeling that there was big misunderstanding, cos pastarni after talking to the touche, he said im happy to award the try and even relayed that message to the TMO who said that was fine.

important to note that the ref has the final word and is allowed to overrule the TMO.
so if pastarani was aware of everything, then he had every right to overrule.

as for the try itself , there was nothing wrong with it, it would have been BS if the try wasnt awarded.

talk about a double movement is way off.
moala is allowed to luge for the line as long as he does it straight away which he did.

watching it at normal speed confirms this, but watching it at slow mo replay and then basing it on that is just stupid.
BO
BoklogicPro1,978 posts
23 Mar 2014, 10:20
#6
23 Mar 2014, 10:20#6
 Sasuke, he cant lunge for the line by propelling himself forward with his knees. That is double movement. He would have to leave the ball, get up and go if he was not held. defini te double movement. The TMO was 100% correct.
MD
Monkey D LuffyPro6,277 posts
23 Mar 2014, 10:41
#7
23 Mar 2014, 10:41#7
@sione lauakis uncles BFF,

moala didnt propel himslef forward, his body twisted in angle which made it look like he propelled himself forward.

moala had no reason to propel himself forward, he could have reached the line from the point where he was tackled.
in reaching for the line like he was entitled to do, and at slowmo replay speed, its easy why so many would be confused and get it so wrong.

watching it a t normal speed tells the real story, not when slowing the footage like GTNO did.

luckily my sharingan and my PHD in armchair rugby will help those understand complex issues with more clarity.
— END OF THREAD —

More from Rugby

More news