Board vote

In the string on Esterhozen and Libbok I posted this:

A match loser ….he should have the ex factor.

Meaning he should be an ex Springbok. Peeper believes I don’t know how the X factor is  written and made an illiterate mistake. Vote clever play on words or illiterate mistake.

Hilarious blunder!

Followed by this clumsy and butchered sentence that could only be posted by someone who has no education or is very drunk:

"You sides are splitting because your a fat, greasy toad."

How are you sides doing, Moffie? Your well known for being a n obsessive and pedantic grammar Nazi so how stupid and hypocritical does that sentence make you feel?

LMAO!

Maybe you need the ex factor!

As I said in the string on the trumpet…..I stand corrected, you’re a fat greasy toad.

You stand schooled, you egg-faced and pompous old fool.

LMAO!

The same string where you gloated in your smarmy and sneering manner over Stav's error. What a foot shoot!

Schooled would imply I don’t know the difference between you and your. Unlikely.

But just settle down and let the Board decide, they know both of us pretty well. I’m sure they will get this right.

Not just "you and your", also "your and you're" . . . in the same sentence . . . on a thread where you were gleefully pointing out a spelling error that Stav made in your sneering, overbearing and smarmy manner.

Maybe you need some ex factor?

LMAO!

Or perhaps you do…Stav’s wasn’t a spelling error, he used the wrong word.

Or is this more your speed:

Hall Of Fame

14786 posts

The ref may as well be wearing a Stompies jersey. Another penalty agains the Sharks. Manie goes for the corner.

Or this:

Hall Of Fame

14786 posts

Scoreboard showing 10-5. Did Jordan's conversion fade to the rightt after it was through?

LMAO!

Are you conceding that you made two blunders in the same sentence (on a thread where you were pontificating about someone else's spelling) or has the penny still not dropped, Moffie?

Or this:

Hall Of Fame

14787 posts

No try, Jean Luc du Plessis yellow carded for a dangerous clean out.

OMG! Typos on a live thread!!!

Better call the cops, Moffie!

But before you go running off to the Typo Authorities . . .  tell me, was I being a grammar Nazi on that thread and was I gloating about anyone else's typos or spelling mistakes on that thread?

Hmmmm?

Not quite the same thing then, is it . . . or are you so stupid you don't see the difference?

LMAO!

Oh now it’s a live thread….haha. So explain how is writing oh revoir rather than au revoir …..a spelling mistake.  Are you saying oh and au have the same meaning. Over to you and  that wasn’t on a live thread.

It’s beginning to look like……..

It's beginning to look like a pathetically childish old windbag who can't admit he made a complete dick of himself.

Loves to dish it out but behaves like a 5 year old when it comes back to him. 

No I admitted in a hasty post I made 2 mistakes and corrected them. You did the same thing in the Stormers thread and made excuses. But you also called ‘oh revoir’ a spelling mistake…..explain.

A match loser ….he should have the ex factor.

Not that obvious, but surely plausible... definitely not worth all the noise even if it was a mistake...one of the most silly gotchas I've seen in a while...beats Maaiks takes on AE hands down.

Both Esterhuizen and Libbok are useless and should not be anyhere near the Spingbok team Both are stupid and have no idea that they ae playing rugby.   Esterhuizen is 30 years old and has neve impressed on test level and has never showed any ball sense ever.   

I say both a re losers that sould never be in any Springbok jerseys in future.    

Both Esterhuizen and Libbok are seelss

Both Esterhuizen and Libbok are seelss

ouMaaik's been up all night (again) ......................... surely.

Sor ry 

I corrected the typing.    and what I was  driving at is clearer  

Good luck for 2025 all!

2024: ex factor being applied

LOL!!!

Denise has xx factor? 

‘Where did you acknowledge your you/your blunder?’

…..followed by claims of liar. 

Right here:

Hall Of Fame

43632 posts

Schooled would imply I don’t know the difference between you and your. Unlikely.

So there you have it, both mistakes acknowledged and addressed.

So here’s what you have to do:

1 Apologize for calling me a liar. I never lie.

2 Explain how ‘oh revoir’ is a spelling mistake.

3 Admit you simply didn’t get ‘ex factor’ because you  jumped to conclusions. As Pakie said, it was obvious.

4 Stop the gotcha stuff, it’s tiresome and you always end up looking like a fool.

And you have never made fun of a poster for their spelling?  I will do as I please and that includes correcting you. Take your long painful first sentence. You need a comma after Nazi and  a comma after board.

LMAO!

Now address the four action points I demanded. Or perhaps you want to say “oh revoir” and hit the booze. It must be grim starting the New Year with yet another humiliation.

Waaaaaaaaaaaaaaahahahahaha!

Demand away you fat-faced fop . . . or would you understand it better if I said "your" fat faced fop?

No I understand this better:

Senior player

3138 posts

Your moving the goal posts. A person can't be racist unless they have a conviction for it or a jail sentence

Two birds with one stone…….waaaaaaaaaaahahahahahahahaha!!!!

"Wehe . . . the pompous old Grammar Nazi getting into a state because people make spelling mistakes or typos on a rugby board makes two embarrassing blunders of his own (three if you count "ex factor") and is now trying to pretend someone else looks the fool."

You constantly do the same fcn thing dipsh!t...do you have absolutely no self awareness at all?

Go on then Squeaky Toy, put up some examples of me correcting anyone other than Moffie . . . or are you just a liar?

Aaand we're off again New Year's Eve dudes, go have a drink and a piece of cake or something. And maybe a puff from the peace pipe. I know I sounded like a total party animal just then but I'll probably be in bed by 10. Good wishes to all.

Well Peeper you used Chat to opine on  posters’ style. So here is the answer to your question:

Based on the interactions between Rooinek and other members on the Ruckers Forum, it appears that Rooinek does engage in correcting other posters' grammar, particularly during debates or disagreements. 

…..

In the elevator going down. Stop man,  suip away it’s New Year….don't humiliate yourself any more.

Well if it's something I do constantly, as Squeak y Toy claims, I'm sure you will find plenty of examples to put up . . . unless of course you're both liars . . .

Peeper you want AI to  rule the world…..here’s a good application, Chat just confirmed Draad’s assertion.  According to you, no need to look any further.