FIXTURESNo upcoming fixtures — check back soon.
FORUM / RUGBY /  Bok match 23 is completely wrong

Bok match 23 is completely wrong

Started by Saffolk 32 REPLIES771 VIEWS· 30 Aug 2013, 16:44
SHAREXFACEBOOKWHATSAPPTELEGRAMREDDITLINKEDIN
SA
Saffolk Captain30,741 posts
30 Aug 2013, 16:44
#1
30 Aug 2013, 16:44#1
Our Bok 23 is 50% of what it should not be and our displays to date under Meyer mirror this. Let’s face it we have had two good games under Meyer and for the rest we have scraped by against mino’s for the most. Its just not bloody good enough and instead of looking forward to our displays, I sit with trepidation expecting the worst given how damn average our side is on paper. How can Meyer get it so wrong? For crying out loud we have been calling for his selection for years only to be let down like no other coach given the high expectations. In the starting 15………Basson, Jean, Morne, Pienaar, Strauss, Jannie, Kruger, Louw. Alberts and Vermeulen are not the best in their respective positions……some of them are not even close……….on the bench, Steenkamp, Flip and Vermaak are not the next best……..that is a total of 13 wrong selections out of a match 23. Its beyond comprehension that anyone can actually think Meyer is getting it right. Lets talk post the Championship when we are 4-0 down against Oz and NZ with this current side that sells us well short. I have never been more disappointed in a coach than Meyer. The likes of PDV was a clown and we expected nothing from him, we cant say the same of Meyer for he seemed to have pulled the wool over our eyes for years. I for one would like to see Meyer sacked, he is not up to the job in terms of selections and game plans
MO
MozartCaptain49,914 posts
30 Aug 2013, 17:00
#2
30 Aug 2013, 17:00#2
When you say "we are down 4-0 against Oz and NZ".....what are you on about Dave?
CL
clevermikeCoach57,555 posts
30 Aug 2013, 17:15
#3
30 Aug 2013, 17:15#3
Mozart I will answer that one with ease:- * a dysfunctional lock combination with Kruger being toitally ineffective; * a totally dysfunctional back row with deficiensies in both breakdown ball recovery, ball carries and defence - Just look at the Soweto stats of the three players involved last year; * A poor inside back selection - with a one-dimensional flyhalf noted for aimless kicking and only one positive - namely kicking at goal; * a slow and out of form scrummie as proven over the whole past year; * and a joke in bad taste as a prop in the form of Steenkamp coming from the bench. Thaqt should take care of nearly half of the team - and I know exactly we have had a atrosious record in away games against Austyraliasian teams since 2010 - all for the same type of reasons listed above. If we lose by less than 20 points against the Wallabies and by less than 30 points sgainst the All Blacks - it would be a bloody miracle.
CL
CleanCutPro9,905 posts
30 Aug 2013, 17:16
#4
30 Aug 2013, 17:16#4

 

Of course not ... his match 23 should include Jantjies and HouGat. What the fuck is he thinking?

 

He should have De Allende in, not to mention Stander and Elstadt.

 

Vermeulen is absolutely useless. I know he played well the last two matches and I know he was by far our best loosie ... but ... if you give me a little time ... I'm sure I can come up with why he shouldn't be included ... It escapes for the moment but I can feel it on the tip of my tongue. 

 

Thankfully the chump has JJ in. I know he can't really defend much ... ummm .... but ... well ... at least he can run ... really fast with ball in hand. 

 

I just hope he continues to play Coenie out of position at 3. It keeps the opposition confused and guessing ... giving us time to get the ball to Stander so that he can pass it on to HouGat who with his three hop pass can get it out eventually into JJ's hands ... so that he can ... well ... run with it ... really fast ... he's the best 13 we have you know?!!

 

MO
MozartCaptain49,914 posts
30 Aug 2013, 17:19
#5
30 Aug 2013, 17:19#5
Gosh "4 to 0" according to Maaik and Dave. OOm even gives me long explanations for why that occurred. And there I was thinking we beat Oz 31 to 8 at Loftus. Silly me!
CL
clevermikeCoach57,555 posts
30 Aug 2013, 17:26
#6
30 Aug 2013, 17:26#6
Mozart What a joke - I said "away games" and you come up with a home game - against an injury-ruined Wallaby team. Just one question - can you read and understand anything??????? One more thing - we did not have the one-dimensional dolt at flyhalf we have now in that match you are referring to. You identify yourself correctly - ":silly me". At last you have it right.
MO
MozartCaptain49,914 posts
30 Aug 2013, 17:40
#7
30 Aug 2013, 17:40#7
The question I asked related to Dave's "4 to 0".....you came up with a long winded explanation of how that happened. The only fly being, it didn't happen. But in a world where 1899 leaps to 2000, I suppose anything is possible.
BE
Beeno1Captain40,032 posts
30 Aug 2013, 18:06
#8
30 Aug 2013, 18:06#8

 So were are going to be klapped by the Ozzies by 20 points and the abs by 30 points save for a miracle - which leaves ou rooitiwt very optimistic - re the abs at least. In fact we will be 4-0 down by end of the Championship. All very interesting.

SA
Saffolk Captain30,741 posts
31 Aug 2013, 14:23
#9
31 Aug 2013, 14:23#9

Oh look we have Clean Cunt talking rugby.......the man who has Mallett, Kockott, Boshoff and Volmink in his Bok starting side........need I say anymore.

 

Clean Cunt, do us all a favour and refrain from comenting on rugby for you know fuck all.

 

Let me guess you think Pienaar has been good at 9 and that the impressive Hougaard could not do a better job......or let me guess Alberts is better than Elsatdt........but better still that donkey Vermeulen is better than CJ Stander.

 

Take it you missed de Allende 's impressive performance this weekend..........

 

But save us your naive take on these players.......entertain us with your justifications for Boshoff at 10 for the Boks and wait for it Volmink on the wing.......what a fucking joke

SA
Saffolk Captain30,741 posts
31 Aug 2013, 14:25
#10
31 Aug 2013, 14:25#10

Moz, under Meyer and with his side, I dont see us winning a single game against Oz or NZ........Meyer is selling us well short in every way. Sad but true

TT
The_TruthClub Pro471 posts
01 Sept 2013, 00:47
#11
01 Sept 2013, 00:47#11

The Bulls had a good season and lost Kruger to an overseas club for the last few matches of the super 15 and their game imploded, particularly the lineouts! Therefore Kruger is "useless"!

 

The Bulls lose most of their experience for the Currie Cup and lose 60 something to the team that barely scraped past the Southern Kings! We must therefore select as many rookies as possible, because we will then win all our matches against New Zealand and Australia! Forever!

 

We must selcet the biggest, fattest players available ("the locks must be 130kg and props must be 120kg") and we must select a flyhalf that runs everything to compliment the fatties that will never get to the ball anyway!

 

We must select players out of position, because that will increase our chances of winning!

 

Then we must appoint a coach with who is so smart that he is fooled by another posters sarcastic team selection and takes it very seriously!

 

I understand your logic! Really I do!...............................NOT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

SA
Saffolk Captain30,741 posts
01 Sept 2013, 23:28
#12
01 Sept 2013, 23:28#12

TitOut stop speaking complete shit. Kruger has added nothing to the Bulls or Boks, he is a bog ordinary lock who lacks the physical clout to be a test lock. He is a complete liability........anyone who thinks otherwise is an ignorant twat......which of course you are.

 

Ah yeah lets stick with the talentless Morne at 10 and continue to win 60% of our test matches......shows how bloody pathetically out of touch and conservative you are.

 

Catch a wake up you idiot

CL
clevermikeCoach57,555 posts
02 Sept 2013, 00:19
#13
02 Sept 2013, 00:19#13
Saffex I know in advance in comments on the loss on Saturday will be. Mozart would blame Engelbrecht (he should never have been in the squad - De Jongh should have been) for the loss - Beeno will blame the bent Kiwi Referees. Nobody could possibly blame Meyer - he did nothing wrong and he selected the two of them supported all out. You know and I know that the squad selected by Meyer comprise in the main of players most of whom have done zilch over the past year - and they are not the best available for selection by Meyer. There is one poor consolation - give a rogue enough rope and he will hang himself. I foresee four major losses by very substantial margins over the next four weeks and that maybe - just maynbe - SARU would realize that Meyer is not a coach's backside. . However, you and I know that there will be a major problem and that it is entirely due to idiotic selections - but we will just have to bear the pain and keep trying to get people to realize that Meyer is not the way to go with SA Rugby.
TT
The_TruthClub Pro471 posts
02 Sept 2013, 01:07
#14
02 Sept 2013, 01:07#14

"Ah yeah lets stick with the talentless Morne at 10 and continue to win 60% of our test matches......shows how bloody pathetically out of touch and conservative you are."

 

Huh?!?!

 

WTF? Do you have some obsession with Morne?

SA
Saffolk Captain30,741 posts
02 Sept 2013, 01:10
#15
02 Sept 2013, 01:10#15

 No, I just think he is SHIT.......does that help, you stupid ignorant twat?

TT
The_TruthClub Pro471 posts
02 Sept 2013, 01:18
#16
02 Sept 2013, 01:18#16

Merely asking, because I said nothng about Morne and you go inot a blind rage about him. It is quite difficult to understand why?

 

From your language, I also take it you suffer from a serious inferiority complex and probably some sort of Napoleon complex, as you react in an extremely aggressive manner, even about something that was not even mentioned. I suggest you seek professional help!

SA
Saffolk Captain30,741 posts
02 Sept 2013, 01:31
#17
02 Sept 2013, 01:31#17

Well given you brought up a running flyhalf you ignorant twat, you clearly were not referring to the useless Bok incumbent.

 

As for my language, let me guess you object to a little bit of swearing you poor delicate pathetic little man......let me guess, you are not a Gordon Ramsay fan then......I take it he suffers from an inferiority complex you wanker?

 

Just asking? 

TT
The_TruthClub Pro471 posts
02 Sept 2013, 01:49
#18
02 Sept 2013, 01:49#18

"you ignorant twat"

"poor delicate pathetic little man"

"you wanker"

Classic projections of your own self onto others to make you feel worthwhile and that life is worth living. The inability to communicate in decent language and a clear sign of an extremely limited vocabulary. Really sad to see another person so lost. You should start to believe inyourself a bit more. Maybe go and study. It will make you feel worthwhile and it will also improve your vocabulary.

SA
Saffolk Captain30,741 posts
02 Sept 2013, 01:58
#19
02 Sept 2013, 01:58#19

Where did you drag that ignorant shit from...........what would you like me to go study then, should I do my masters in law, for a law degree obviously falls well short in your estimation.

 

Fuck off wee man

RU
RugganutClub Pro183 posts
02 Sept 2013, 05:33
#20
02 Sept 2013, 05:33#20

TheTruth - Saffex has the decorum of a very unbalanced child. He claims to be a lawyer but but with his intelect probably only prosecutes parking tickets in rural England.

He is faily knowlegable of the game but that is all cancelled out as he has an inability to hear other opinions (a strong trait needed in law). When he gets into a conflict or someone else voices an opinion his first reaction is to swear and ridicule the person. This is a common trait of very spoilt children of about 6 years old when they do not get their way.

He complained that he was being moderated on another website and was thereafter thrown out. This website is the only place he is tolerated and he finds securty in the small corner he is accepted but not liked. What a person of limited mind does is to then try and dominate the area of acceptance. This usually leads to a spectacular downfall of which is just around the corner as people are getting fed up with his antics. 

Saffex we have been through this before. Please stop the swearing and ridicule and just  'fuck off you wee man'. Hopefully that is in a language you understand.

RE
redsmanPro1,710 posts
02 Sept 2013, 10:21
#21
02 Sept 2013, 10:21#21
1. Don't write the Bok off yet - note they are on top of RC table(log) and Aussies on bottom. kiwis languishing beneath the bok - apparently super coach meyer is working wonders.............................. lol 2. Ref was Allain but apparently pulled hammy and George Clancy is it... the ref politics continue....... 3. QC firming up as starting 10 with HOPEFULLY Folau @ 15 but with QC @ 10 maybe Link will mix it up and Toomua to 15 to switch with QC in defence.... who knows 4. Ill be there to support the wallabies in gold and comment on the performance of both - Initially I though wallabies will win this easy but got a feeling bok are going to bring it.... still think wobs should be good enough to take the win.
CL
CleanCutPro9,905 posts
02 Sept 2013, 10:56
#22
02 Sept 2013, 10:56#22

 

TheTruthIsOutThere … I see you’ve taken note of the resident clown’s complete ignorance. Didn’t take you long, huh!! You seem to be quick on the uptake.

 

I like your instincts.

 

He usually likes to use profanity when he’s been given a verbal bashing. The more you bash him, the worse his language becomes.

 

You will notice I’ve been upgraded to “cunt” already … you have a little more work to do as you’ve just reached “tit” … keep up the good work though cause I can see a promotion coming your way … real soon.

 

The poor dear doesn’t have much of brain so any form of sarcasm is beyond his grasp. I would suggest you learn how to speak ”moron” cause he usually responds quite well to Beeno who is rather proficient at it.  

 

I guess that’s why we don’t get on.

 

Dismiss this chump for the arse he is.

 

SA
Saffolk Captain30,741 posts
02 Sept 2013, 15:59
#23
02 Sept 2013, 15:59#23
CleanCunt we don't want you distracted.......get back to informing us on rugby matters.......we cannot begin to survive without your input........your Bok side was the laugh of the decade, why not pleasure us with your back-up side. I suggest a google search, for we don't want you embarrassing yourself with getting the basics wrong like the hooker belongs in the scrum etc. Please, please stick to rugby.........therein lies your forte
SA
Saffolk Captain30,741 posts
02 Sept 2013, 16:02
#24
02 Sept 2013, 16:02#24
Rugtwat, I know you are as thick as pigshit and incapable of grasping the basics........but for the record I have never been thrown off any site. I was being moderated because I called a bunch of wankers a bunch of racist after their negative takes on Madiba........I left on my own accord.......do a search and work out what that means you stupid baboon
CL
CleanCutPro9,905 posts
02 Sept 2013, 17:38
#25
02 Sept 2013, 17:38#25

 

What’s all this “we” you keep mentioning … ???

 

Huh??

 

You’re not suggesting that the majority of this board agrees with your nonsensical posts … are you ... ???

 

Waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaahahahahahahahahahahahaaaaaaaaaaa!!!

 

KA
KalaedFreddieClub Pro495 posts
02 Sept 2013, 18:13
#26
02 Sept 2013, 18:13#26

{quote}"you ignorant twat"

"poor delicate pathetic little man"

"you wanker"

Classic projections of your own self onto others to make you feel worthwhile and that life is worth living.{quote}

 

You see, that is why my daddy slept with my mother.  It made him feel mighty when she called him "Baas".  Baas Dave, you have such a huge...sense of humour..  LOL.  If only my daddy could know rugby players like he knows how to swear at other people he could be a better trainer than Meyer.

 

Deep down he loves, Morne and Meyer but fears that others will see him as weak and now he just swears when you mention their names.

Daddy dont be so vile, it is unbecomming of a man in your position and standing in society.. Hahahahahaaaaa! Jou fokken doos!

BD
Big DaveRookie74 posts
02 Sept 2013, 19:32
#27
02 Sept 2013, 19:32#27

Jan give me a hard on Serfontein should be starting instead of the useless Jean Devilliers. Elton Janjies makes my squad ahead of the talentless Morne.... 

CL
clevermikeCoach57,555 posts
02 Sept 2013, 20:33
#28
02 Sept 2013, 20:33#28
Saffex Other than your mangled idea about the useless Jantjies - I do sympathize wirgh your viewpoint Have a look what problems the general public has identified in an opinion poll on the Springboks and see what moat of then think about Meyer's stupid selections approach.
SA
Saffolk Captain30,741 posts
03 Sept 2013, 02:44
#29
03 Sept 2013, 02:44#29

CleanCunt........if it helps we can stick with the 'I'.........I'll rephrase my plea.........I would like you to keep things to rugby as your pathetic ignorance is a tonic........hope that helps........how's Boshoff progressing as the potential Bok 10......bwhaaaaahaaaaaa.

 

Please, please post your Bok back-up side........pretty please.......I promise not to laugh!!

 

Take your time wise one!!

 

 

AJ
Arthur JohnPro1,748 posts
03 Sept 2013, 03:00
#30
03 Sept 2013, 03:00#30

Please guys....lets keep this forum out of the gutters.

This forum is for rugby fans and such.

Bu all means lets express our opinions on SA Rugby but do it in the spirit of sport, honour  and respect.

Thank you all for your contributions on this great game.

LETS KEEP THIS FORUM CLEAN.

SA
Saffolk Captain30,741 posts
03 Sept 2013, 15:22
#31
03 Sept 2013, 15:22#31
AJ - Yawn
TT
The_TruthClub Pro471 posts
07 Sept 2013, 00:17
#32
07 Sept 2013, 00:17#32

And this is the thread where you said it!

SA
Saffolk Captain30,741 posts
07 Sept 2013, 01:39
#33
07 Sept 2013, 01:39#33

Trooooof what would it be that I said........let me guess, I alleged I was a lawyer huh?

 

Do you realise just how stupid you look, but you keep digging you stupid fool........candy from a baby ring any bells?

 

Keep exposing your stupidity, it saves me the job

— END OF THREAD —

More from Rugby

More news