FIXTURESNo upcoming fixtures — check back soon.
FORUM / RUGBY /  Bok ratings and comments

Bok ratings and comments

Started by Beeno15 REPLIES417 VIEWS· 17 Sept 2016, 23:40
SHAREXFACEBOOKWHATSAPPTELEGRAMREDDITLINKEDIN
BE
Beeno1Captain40,032 posts
17 Sept 2016, 23:40
#1
17 Sept 2016, 23:40#1
Ex Supersport

Cape Town – A streaker intruded onto the AMI Stadium pitch late in the All Blacks’ widely-predicted 41-13 demolition of the Springboks on Saturday.

Television largely shielded us from the, er, flashpoint so we will never know whether the person was a worthy candidate for standout factor of the match. (PROBABLY JW SEEKING SOME ATTENTION!1)

What we can pretty confidently say is that the mantle was never warranted by a South African on a night when Bok frailties were instead only laid painfully bare again.

The score-line ended up being worse – though perhaps not by that much? – than many domestic pundits had first feared, with the New Zealanders registering six tries to one, some of their dot-downs coming with consummate ease as chaotic visiting defensive organisation proved a significant bugbear.

Bok fans had to settle for the solace of fitful passages of play in which the losers were reasonably bright and astute, especially during a more competitive first half. (AS NOTED BY BEENO)

Among those crumbs of comfort was confirmation of the rich potential of Pieter-Steph du Toit, the 24-year-old who was arguably the best lock in this Test and my pick as the Boks’ own premier performer, albeit closely followed by Warren Whiteley, Francois Louw and Adriaan Strauss. (iRECALL dR mOZ BLUNDERING ON DU tOIT BUT WE ALL KNOW DR MOZ DOESNT KNOW A GOD LOCK WHEN HE SEES ONE)

Here’s how I rated the Boks out of 10 in Christchurch:

Johan Goosen: 5.5

Tried hard to be constructive, with one promising in-field bust, and took a couple of good options. Defensive shortcomings probably attributable more to collective Bok structural woes there.

Bryan Habana: 5

Timed his burst intelligently to crash over for lone Bok try, in first half. But has to take his share of the rap for team’s leaky tendencies in wide channels.

Jesse Kriel: 5.5

Threatened to crack the advantage line once or twice. No particularly glaring lapses in his channel when Boks were under cosh, but still short of influence shown last year.

Juan de Jongh: 5.5

Committed and often adhesive. But few signs of X-factor, either – a problem throughout current Bok ranks.

Francois Hougaard: 6

This scrumhalf as long-term wing answer? I still strongly suspect not. But give him his due: ever-gutsy here, with some solid aid on defence and a couple of safe high-ball takes.(AGREE)

Elton Jantjies: 4

Sands of time at Test level for the flyhalf may well have run out here. Horribly inconsistent on the night, including wince-worthy, elementary errors that effectively led to two tries against Boks. Also botched kick-off straight from the break. A few brave tackles.

Faf de Klerk: 3.5

More traumatic outing than Jantjies, and that’s saying something. Has lurched violently backwards of late. Game-management negligible, kicking poor, and gave oceans of space to both All Black No 9s used (Messrs Smith and Perenara). NOT A FAIR COMMENT!!  

Warren Whiteley: 6.5

Against the best, chose good opportunity to confirm he is, indeed, Test-class. Especially vibrant in first half, with good carries and tackles, and lovely shimmy and offload for Habana try.

Oupa Mohoje: 4.5

Calling Oupa … calling Oupa? Anybody there? Overwhelmingly anonymous stint; quickly subbed in second half. Even his tackling relish in earlier Championship games seemingly vanished.

Francois Louw: 6.5

Much improved on occasion of 50th appearance. Often the first to appear at breakdowns. Vital tackle on charging Malakai Fekitoa near Bok line on one occasion.  

Pieter-Steph  du Toit: 7

Blond head popped up everywhere. Commanding overall showing. Big drive before Bok try, priceless steal under pressure beneath own posts, and seriously rangy on cover-defence.

Eben Etzebeth: 5.5

By his high standards, this was a pretty quiet one, though still did his honest share of coalface toil. I say it again … rising danger of over-play and associated fatigue.(hE DID A HUGE AMOUNT OF GRUNT WORK. i WOULD GIVE HIM AT LEAST A 7)

Vincent Koch: 5.5

Battled to enforce a right shoulder at scrums, and pinged twice, but otherwise a fair enough Test, justifying recall. Sprightly in open play, with powerful carries and decisive tackles.(IMPROVE SCRUMMING AND HE WOULD BE VERY GOOD. BOK SCRUM MISSES REDLINGHUYS. BUT KOCH VERY GOOD OUTSIDE SCRUM)

Adriaan Strauss: 6.5

Malcolm Marx’s “difficult” debut as lineout-thrower in second half – about three went astray – only reminded how valuable Strauss remains as a Deadeye Dick in that area. The skipper was much more prominent in general exchanges, too, and won a breakdown penalty.(nOTHING WRONG WITH MARX AND THROWING IN. JUST NEEDS TO PRACTISE WITH JUMPERS ETC HE IS THE REAL DEAL)

Tendai Mtawarira: 5

It becomes tedious to have to describe his ordinariness. Once again, not a patch on the Beast of old. Just seems to have nothing left, or new, to offer.

Standout substitute:

Jaco Kriel: 5.5

So much for the much-trumpeted, anticipated impact of the forward-heavy Springbok bench! The Boks stayed overwhelmingly on the back foot as changes increasingly occurred during the second half, and few subs made any discernible difference. After tricky thought, I opted for tearaway flank Kriel, as he scurried about keenly and made some tackles. But that was about it. ALBERTS WAS A DISASTER


MO
MozartCaptain49,914 posts
17 Sept 2016, 23:50
#2
17 Sept 2016, 23:50#2
 Gosh HasBeen you are clueless....better read my ratings to see what really happened.
JW
Just_winCaptain18,570 posts
18 Sept 2016, 02:06
#3
18 Sept 2016, 02:06#3
Well one only hopes the Boks learnt from the tutorial - no need to thanks us. 
CL
clevermikeCoach57,555 posts
18 Sept 2016, 06:50
#4
18 Sept 2016, 06:50#4
 Mozart - I thought that BS was written by Mozart elsewhere.   He has the distinct ability of writing falsified match descriptions.       
CL
clevermikeCoach57,555 posts
18 Sept 2016, 06:50
#5
18 Sept 2016, 06:50#5
 Mozart - I thought that BS was written by Mozart elsewhere.   He has the distinct ability of writing falsified match descriptions.       
CL
CleanCutPro9,905 posts
18 Sept 2016, 09:48
#6
18 Sept 2016, 09:48#6
 PSDT my man of the match. Simply superb. Light years ahead of the weedy Lood and must start in every test.
Whiteley had a cracker. Getting better and better. The 8 jersey is his to keep. Make him captain and sack Strauss immediately.  
Marx had a good innings for his first time outing. He will get better with his line put in. Must surely start in the next test. The 2 jersey belongs to him without doubt. 
Jaco Kriel was a little quite. Not a bench player. Never has been. Must surely be given his first start in the next match. The 6 jersey belongs to him. We all now that. How much longer will this quota coach persist with the old and tired Louw?? 
Eben was solid as usual. Class act. Best lock in the world.   
All the above are boys for the future.
Now for the rest. 
Habana was quite apart from the try. His hunger and passion is no longer visible. Merely going through the paces. Unacceptable. Time to replace this old man. 
Juan de Jongh and Jesse Kriel were their usual selves. Ineffective. Another bit of stupidity from the Quota coach.
The less said about HouGat on the wing the better. 
We can easily start the test match with 13 men and come away better off without Goosen and Jantjies. Simply useless. Another quota coach brain fart. 
In short ... much better from the youngsters. Additional on form youngster like Janse van Rensburg need to be brought in and exposed to the test arena. 
Sadly the elderly Beast, Strauss and Louw are holding the boys back. Like ball and chains around the ankles. 
Hopefully we'll see empty stadiums on the home leg. 
Would be awesome to see them thrashed at home
 

— END OF THREAD —

More from Rugby

More news