FIXTURESNo upcoming fixtures — check back soon.
FORUM / RUGBY /  Bok squad

Bok squad

Started by Saffolk 20 REPLIES1,819 VIEWS· 28 Oct 2018, 16:05
SHAREXFACEBOOKWHATSAPPTELEGRAMREDDITLINKEDIN
SA
Saffolk Captain30,741 posts
28 Oct 2018, 16:05
#1
28 Oct 2018, 16:05#1
I like most of it but for the loosies. Good to see Petersen rewarded he is a class act - one of those players that is able to create something from nothing and always looking to get involved. Aplon and Brits are stupid selections given their age. Aplon is a never been - far too small. The changes I would have made: Given Gelant is injured I would have gone bold and selected Fassi ahead of Aplon. Janse v Rensburg ahead of Nel and I would have included Serfontein ahead of Kolbe if we are to keep the number to 36. I like Esterhuizen but I prefer Vorster. The rest of the backs are good choices. Good to see Schrauder in he has been playing good rugby for some time. Makes good decisions and has a good service. We don’t need 4 tightheads, I would have lost Koch for Pierre Schoeman. Aker ahead of Brits is an obvious call. At lock I’d have Paul Willemse ahead of Mostert and while I rate JD, Jenkins is better. But I’d move PSDT back to lock where he belongs and bring Jacques du Plessis in Mosterts place. I would have selected the du Preez twins and Marcel Coetzee ahead of Vermeulen, Louw and Whitely. So my squad would have been: 15. Willie / Fassi 14/11. Dyantyi / Nkosi / Petersen 13/12. Kriel / de Allende / Janse v Rensburg / Serfontein / Vorster 10. Pollard / Jantjies / Willemse 9. Schrauder / v Zyl / Papier 1/3. Kitshoff / Nyakane / Schoeman / du Toit / Louw / Malherbe 2. Marx / Mbonambi / Aker 4/5. Etzebeth / Willemse / PSDT / Lood / Snyman 6/7/8. Kolisi / Dan du Preez / JL du Preez / Jacques du Plessis / Marcel Coetzee / Notshe
MO
MozartCaptain49,914 posts
28 Oct 2018, 16:30
#2
28 Oct 2018, 16:30#2
Woulda,coulda, shoulda....mentioning Vorster in the context of international rugby is just another loony toons pick. Face it Dave you simply can't see the flaws of these players....except for age and weight. I could write a little computer that would accurately predict your teams. Shall I do it and save you the trouble?
CL
clevermikeCoach57,555 posts
28 Oct 2018, 16:32
#3
28 Oct 2018, 16:32#3

Dave

Just a question - there are conflicting local reports on Vermeulen.   Some reports claimed he played rugby for his Japanese Club - other reports indicating he is returning from an injury lay-off.  If the latter I think he  may flop in SR next year playing for the Bulls. 

He was very good in the first two tests against the English in June  and then the bottom fell out after he complained of aches and pains after the second test.   He was not much more than a passenger in the third test.  In essence he should not be selected on the basis Meyer used to pick his WC squad in 2015,

CL
clevermikeCoach57,555 posts
28 Oct 2018, 16:37
#4
28 Oct 2018, 16:37#4

Mozart

I disagree with Dave on his selections - he is entitled to his opinion on players.  You have never given players on your prejudice hate list credit for good performance and the players you constantly supported in the past mostly failed in the WC and since.

I would rather not talk about other members viewpoints on players and if I were you start looking at the duds you have supported in the past.     

SA
Saffolk Captain30,741 posts
28 Oct 2018, 16:41
#5
28 Oct 2018, 16:41#5
Oh Moz coming from you with your pathetically weak take on players it’s hardly going to make an impression on me. Fuck me do you think I’d expect you to agree with me. The fact that you see little positives in players like PSDT, Lood, the du Preez twins, de Allende, Kriel or Vorster for instance speaks volumes for how warped your takes are. Enhanced by finding favour in such utterly average players like Mostert and Francious Louw. As I said before I just can’t respect your takes at all, predictable and boring. If size and age was an issue why would I select Petersen on the wing and if it was an age thing then why would I embrace the selections of Nyakane, Willie, Schrauder etc. So go ahead and write a computer whatever the fuck that is!!!!
SA
Saffolk Captain30,741 posts
28 Oct 2018, 16:45
#6
28 Oct 2018, 16:45#6
The only good thing about Vermeulen in the squad is that we will have one less paper weight in the starting side in Whitely. Hopefully Rassie is a massive Lood fan and he will replace the headless chicken that is Mostert - the only other paper weight in the side
MO
MozartCaptain49,914 posts
28 Oct 2018, 17:25
#7
28 Oct 2018, 17:25#7
There we go the weight constraint in play...sooooo predictable.
CL
clevermikeCoach57,555 posts
28 Oct 2018, 17:56
#8
28 Oct 2018, 17:56#8

Mozart

In Tight 5 weight and physical strength is a problem.   You have been asked why the rolling mauls have virtually dried up  - the deficiency started showing its ugly head in 2014. 

The problems encountered with Matfield and Mostert were described in detail.   All you responded on was total BS and we are still waiting for a logical contribution from you on that one.   

Sorry - but that problem will not go away if Mostert remains as a lock.

   

SA
Saffolk Captain30,741 posts
28 Oct 2018, 18:21
#9
28 Oct 2018, 18:21#9
How much do Willie, Petersen, Fassi and Dyantyi weigh? How much does Notshe weigh? Moz I think you are not only being exposed here but try move on it’s liberating.
RO
RooinekCaptain18,117 posts
28 Oct 2018, 18:22
#10
28 Oct 2018, 18:22#10
Dave, just be grateful that you differ from a rugby noob like Moffie. 
I'd be worried if the ignorant and biased old fool agreed with me on player selections.
SA
Saffolk Captain30,741 posts
28 Oct 2018, 18:37
#11
28 Oct 2018, 18:37#11
I often wonder if Moz is watching the same game the rest of the world is? But I guess it would be boring if we all agreed. I could go on forever trying to convince him that PSDT is a class act and it’s of no consequence just as much as all his negative about the player will never convince me otherwise. Conversely he can do the same regarding say the useless Francious Louw, no amount of persuasion will change my view on him. Same applies to the physicality of Mostert - at least Mostert is a good player I give him that, he just does not belong in a test side as a lock
PL
PlumCaptain21,007 posts
28 Oct 2018, 21:43
#12
28 Oct 2018, 21:43#12

Anyone else a bit disappointed with Rob du Preez?

He's had  few seasons now and his progress has been much slower than his perceived pedigree seemed to suggest it should.

At the start of the year I thought that by now he might be putting some pressure on Pollard.

With his dad being a Bok 9, he probably received a lot of valuable training/guidence by 18.

He doesn't seem to make poor choices. Just lacks a lot of execution. 

Maybe he'll have a proper breakout year soon.

sharkbok
sharkbokCaptain23,253 posts
29 Oct 2018, 03:40
#13
29 Oct 2018, 03:40#13
Robert Dupreez seems more like an inside center, than a flyhalf. He lacks a kicking game, and his option taking can be limited when under pressure.
The best game he played was for the Barbarians, otherwise he is hot and cold. 
AU
AugenöffnerPro6,974 posts
29 Oct 2018, 04:01
#14
29 Oct 2018, 04:01#14

That pass early on in the Currie Cup final totally changed the momentum. Those are telling. His two charge downs in quick succession to lose the Welsh test this year Was another. I haven't seen much of him, but what I have seen is a player who always seems to be a half-beat behind play. Some bad option taking. A little coaching would help, but what kind of help will he receive? He has potential. 

He is 25 now. We'll see where he is in a couple of years. He is a long way off where Pollard was at 20. 

DE
DennyCaptain12,893 posts
29 Oct 2018, 08:14
#15
29 Oct 2018, 08:14#15

Robert Du Preez is too slow and sterile for a flyhalf.

DB
DbDraadCaptain26,388 posts
29 Oct 2018, 08:40
#16
29 Oct 2018, 08:40#16

Forwards: Schalk Brits, Lood de Jager, Pieter-Steph du Toit, Thomas du Toit, Eben Etzebeth, Steven Kitshoff, Vincent Koch, Siya Kolisi (c), Francois Louw, Wilco Louw, Frans Malherbe, Malcolm Marx, Bongi Mbonambi, Franco Mostert, Sikhumbuzo Notshe, Trevor Nyakane, JD Schickerling, RG Snyman, Duane Vermeulen, Warren Whiteley


Backs: Gio Aplon, Damian de Allende, Aphiwe Dyantyi, André Esterhuizen, Elton Jantjies, Cheslin Kolbe, Jesse Kriel, Wille le Roux, Ruhan Nel, Sbu Nkosi, Embrose Papier, Sergeal Petersen, Handré Pollard, Louis Schreuder, Ivan van Zyl, Damian Willemse.

Some people are complaining about some WP bias from Rassie. 22 of the 36 has WP ties, not counting Willie, Pollard and Thomas du Toit, who played for WP at junior level....well I counted Jantjies who only played for the Stormers on a loan deal.

PL
PlumCaptain21,007 posts
29 Oct 2018, 22:11
#17
29 Oct 2018, 22:11#17

Shark

I was thinking that too. He does hit the line nicely when he runs at it. 

There have also been a few glimpses of him running gaps from time to time.

The Sharks in general have been struggling to put continuous phases together all year and maybe that hasn't helped him.

Anyway, I think there were a few here that expected a bit more than whAt we've seen.

BE
Beeno1Captain40,032 posts
29 Oct 2018, 23:17
#18
29 Oct 2018, 23:17#18

Folks WP carries South Afri can rugby always has!

CL
clevermikeCoach57,555 posts
29 Oct 2018, 23:40
#19
29 Oct 2018, 23:40#19

Draad

Many years ago I went to a Springbok game and they lost,  There were 8 WP players in the Springbok team.   Just outside the stadium there was not too sober a guy pissing and a bloke tried to get him to stop.  His response was -

"WP against the wall"

I do not think it is fair to highlight and underline players with connections with WP.  

*   Fact is Le Roux never  played for WP - he went from Boland to the Cheetahs. Erasmus said at the time he refused to give Le Roux a contract and afterwards admitted he made a mistake.   Pollad is in much the sake boat - he played some schools rugby in WP - but he never played for any WP ream after he left school.

*     Some players like Jantjies and Koch was on loan for a year by the Lions and Pumas respectively and there stint was comparatively short and Jantjies dialed so badly - the contract was cut when they let him to go back  to the Lions, because his performances were way below expectations.

*   Some player played for other provinces and moved to the WP after having made their names in other provinces.   To my mind that is really not fair.     

The above examples are just some indications confirming my opinion  as stated abo ve 

CE
CeradynePro9,374 posts
30 Oct 2018, 00:29
#20
30 Oct 2018, 00:29#20
“I do not think it is fair to highlight and underline players with connections with WP. ” If you want to use that logic, it blows your assertion that HM was biased towards Bulls players out of the water. By your logic he only had one genuine Bulls player in his first EOYT, ie Morne Steyn. The irony is that Steyn only came off the bench against Scotland on that tour. He didn’t even feature in the others. How does that square up with your arguments?
CL
clevermikeCoach57,555 posts
30 Oct 2018, 00:48
#21
30 Oct 2018, 00:48#21

Ignorance is bliss

— END OF THREAD —

More from Rugby

More news