Bok team to play Nz

Springboks – 15 Andries Coetzee, 14 Raymond Rhule, 13 Jesse Kriel, 12 Jan Serfontein, 11 Courtnall Skosan, 10 Elton Jantjies, 9 Ross Cronjé, 8 Uzair Cassiem, 7 Jean-Luc du Preez, 6 Siya Kolisi, 5 Franco Mostert, 4 Eben Etzebeth (c), 3 Ruan Dreyer, 2 Malcolm Marx, 1 Beast Mtawarira. Subs: 16 Bongi Mbonambi, 17 Steven Kitshoff, 18 Trevor Nyakane,19 Lood de Jager, 20 Pieter-Steph du Toit, 21 Francois Hougaard, 22 Handré Pollard, 23 Damian de Allende. .. The way this reads Stephanie is now our bench loosie....bit of a surprise there.

 I'll say Steph is their because of his versatility. Solid team. They are going to miss Kriel though. Defensively going to have to be a lot better. Abs have fire power and factor 1-23.

 
Well common, Chip ... lets have your source.

It's rude not give your source ... remember the lecture you gave me the other day ... or is it do as I say not as I do.

 CleanCut???
Why "Well common, Chip ... lets have your source."

Is that a typo, because I'm confused!

My biggest issue is that there are no proper loosies to cover on the bench.

 
Haaaaaaaaaaaaaaaahahahahahaaa!!!

No man ... you were once known as "Chop" ... not Chip. I see why you're confused. My bad.

Mozart has a "chip" on his shoulder regarding his age and the young talent that show his elderly favourites up on the pitch.

Perhaps I should just stick to "Moffie" ... I'm sure he won't mind.



 

 So Coetzee selections still baffles me. Draft Dreyer straight into the starting lineup skipping burger muncher Nyakane. What is the point of even having the guy in the team then?
So we have 2 loose heads on the Bench + 2 Locks on the bench. How does that make sense? 
Where is Dan Dupreez?
And I'm not even sure why Mostert is starting ahead of PSDT. He was by far our best player last week. What will Mostert offer? 
Then why would you draft Lomp De Jager. The guys has not been playing consistently for the past 2 seasons and what impact will he offer which Dan Dupreez could not. 
Yet again, doesn't matter how good the support staff you have. He still manages to select the wrong players.

 The trouble is even if we lose Coetzee wont learn or will be so constrained by the 50% quota rule that he cant do anything. This quota BS bedevils all attempts to analyse matters.Sorry Steph was dropped. Wilco Should be on bench at the very least. No Combrinck of course and no Faf. Cassiem???? Bongi ahead of Akkers!!!!!!!!!! Its a quota nightmare.
Meanwhile the ans will crow like mad if the win against this shambles.That said a Bok side at 75% can a lways beat the wee abs!

 The trouble is even if we lose Coetzee wont learn or will be so constrained by the 50% quota rule that he cant do anything. This quota BS bedevils all attempts to analyse matters.Sorry Steph was dropped. Wilco Should be on bench at the very least. No Combrinck of course and no Faf. Cassiem???? Bongi ahead of Akkers!!!!!!!!!! Its a quota nightmare.
Meanwhile the ans will crow like mad if the win against this shambles.That said a Bok side at 75% can a lways beat the wee abs!

 I see Damien the tractor de Alle nde made the bench. That should give Moz some comfort

'Common'.....oh I get it, you wanted 'c'mon'. Hahaha always amusing when spell check can't save a moron.

Yes, I remember when someone got quite "phased" by the spellchecker!

LMAO!

I don't use spellcheck.....down goes Urinal. Man it's sooooooooooo easy!

Duh-huh . . . this board has a built in spellchecker, stupidissimo!

"I don't use spellcheck"

Pfffffffffffffffhahahahahahaha!

Don't use it stipid

What a bloody idiot you are.

"Don't use it stipid (sic)"

LMAO!

I see that . . . maybe you should?

Let's correct Moffie's earlier statement . . .

"I do use spellcheck . . . only I'm so phenomenally "stipid" (sic) I've never known un til now that it was there!"

'Stipid' was deliberate to prove the point....obviously. I have never ised this feature. AND THAT'S ALSO DELIBERATE.

By the way it's not 'til' it's 'till' .. Game, set and match.

Was "teath" deliberate as well? How about "viscous" or "phased" or "neanderthall"?

The doddering old fool probably thinks we're all "stipid" enough to believe him!

LMAO!

Nope 'teath' was a careless mistake not corrected by spellcheck. Thanks for providing that additional proof.....waaaaaahahaha....stop shooting, I'm feeling sorry for the foot. .. Man this is hilarious.'

 Not sur vhat sepelle chq hz tvvo doo wit thiz toepic

 q