15. Willie 14. Hendricks 13. Sadie 12. Watermeyer 11. Skosan 10. Potgieter 9. Hougaard 1. Kitshoff 2. Strauss 3. Malherbe 4. Willemse 5. de Jager 6. Kriel 7. du Plessis 8. Vermeulen
Captain30,741 posts
24 Mar 2014, 14:25
#1
24 Mar 2014, 14:25#1
Bokbarometer for the week
Started by Saffolk 6 REPLIES154 VIEWS· 24 Mar 2014, 14:25
Coach57,555 posts
24 Mar 2014, 17:50
#2
24 Mar 2014, 17:50#2
In the main I agree - but think that Boshoff was better than Potgieter and I would also pick little Faf as th e scrummie ahead of Hougaard.
Captain26,388 posts
24 Mar 2014, 18:14
#3
24 Mar 2014, 18:14#3
Let's see what the Lions do when the chips are down on tour. Boshoff and Faf seems to be the real thing though.
Captain49,914 posts
24 Mar 2014, 22:29
#4
24 Mar 2014, 22:29#4
Aplon, Hendriks, de Jongh, Steyn Mvovo, Boshoff, Faf.
Beast, Strauss, Jannie, Willemse, Matfield, Stegman, Alberts, Vermeulen
Coach57,555 posts
24 Mar 2014, 23:39
#5
24 Mar 2014, 23:39#5
Mozart
Are you nuts or something? De Jongh came on for a few minutes and scored a try with the line open in front of him. The try scored by Mapoe was much more difficult. Sadie had an excellent game as a starter and was better than either. By the way De Jongh had his normal missed tackle ratio = this time it was 50%. Prejudice really coming through loud and clear.
Steyn did kick well at goal - he did bugger-all else. The rest of his game was abysmal - so what makes him a selection?
Beast was mediocre and Jannie an absolute disgrace. How do you justify their inclusion?
Other than Strauss and Vermeulen the rest of your selections are really Bullshit - not at all in accordance with what the various players did. Du Plessis was miles better than Alberts and Kriel outplayed Stregmann comprehensively,
Why are you never objective when watching rugby and make a foolish contribution like you did in this case.
Are you nuts or something? De Jongh came on for a few minutes and scored a try with the line open in front of him. The try scored by Mapoe was much more difficult. Sadie had an excellent game as a starter and was better than either. By the way De Jongh had his normal missed tackle ratio = this time it was 50%. Prejudice really coming through loud and clear.
Steyn did kick well at goal - he did bugger-all else. The rest of his game was abysmal - so what makes him a selection?
Beast was mediocre and Jannie an absolute disgrace. How do you justify their inclusion?
Other than Strauss and Vermeulen the rest of your selections are really Bullshit - not at all in accordance with what the various players did. Du Plessis was miles better than Alberts and Kriel outplayed Stregmann comprehensively,
Why are you never objective when watching rugby and make a foolish contribution like you did in this case.
Captain30,741 posts
25 Mar 2014, 11:06
#6
25 Mar 2014, 11:06#6
de Jongh.....bwhaaaahaaaa
Steyn ahead of Watermeyer, you must be kidding
Stegman ahead of Kriel is a joke, but the biggest joke of all is Alberts ahead of du Plessis
Lewies was better than Matfield at 5
Coach57,555 posts
25 Mar 2014, 11:46
#7
25 Mar 2014, 11:46#7
Saffex
Mozart' choices have nothing to do with actual performances and everything to do with his favourite players - irrespective of how poor some of them in fact were.
Mozart' choices have nothing to do with actual performances and everything to do with his favourite players - irrespective of how poor some of them in fact were.
— END OF THREAD —
