FIXTURESNo upcoming fixtures — check back soon.
FORUM / RUGBY /  Boks Jump to 3rd in IRB Rankings?

Boks Jump to 3rd in IRB Rankings?

Started by sharkbok25 REPLIES1,151 VIEWS· 16 Jun 2018, 22:36
SHAREXFACEBOOKWHATSAPPTELEGRAMREDDITLINKEDIN
sharkbok
sharkbokCaptain23,255 posts
16 Jun 2018, 22:36
#1
16 Jun 2018, 22:36#1

2018-06-16 15:30pm

Bok incentive: Beat England in 2nd test and jump to 3rd in rankings2018-06-16 15:30Rassie Erasmus (Gallo)

    Cape Town - The Springboks will jump from seventh to third in the World Rugby rankings if they beat England in Bloemfontein after Ireland beat the Wallabies in Melbourne on Saturday.    (Now Beaten)

    Kick-off at the Toyota Stadium is at 17:05.

    The Boks stayed at No 7 despite beating England 42-39 at Ellis Park last Saturday, with Eddie Jones’ team dropping from No 3 to No 4.

    However, South Africa will break back into the world’s top three if they take a 2-0 series lead. (Now Beaten)

    These permutations were confirmed by World Rugby CEO Brett Gosper on Twitter.

    Top 20 in the current World Rugby rankings:

    1. New Zealand 93.99
    2. Ireland 88.05
    3. Australia 86.56
    4. England 85.19
    5. Wales 85.13
    6. Scotland 83.83
    7. South Africa 83.81
    8. France 79.10
    9. Fiji 77.93
    10. Argentina 77.54
    11. Japan 76.02
    12. Georgia 74.75
    13. Tonga 71.08
    14. Italy 70.73
    15. USA 69.39
    16. Samoa 69.03
    17. Romania 68.25
    18. Uruguay 65.37
    19. Russia 63.11
    20. Spain 63.09


    -------------

    England have not played well collectively. For some reason they have started very well, then crumbled under pressure. They are a stronger team on paper than the results they have delivered so far in this series.

    CH
    ChippoPro3,372 posts
    16 Jun 2018, 23:05
    #2
    16 Jun 2018, 23:05#2
    Good times So glad we have a non politically elected coach again.
    sharkbok
    sharkbokCaptain23,255 posts
    17 Jun 2018, 00:06
    #3
    17 Jun 2018, 00:06#3
    A great start- but the confirmation of Rassie's ability and the player's skills will be in the 4 nations and also the end of the year tour. England just seemed to fall apart under pressure, despite opening both games very well. 
    South Africa also looked good against France last year at home, and even Ok against Ireland the year before. Only to then get destroyed by the All Blacks and then pulverised on the EOYT.
    Tight 5The tight 5 has the most depth in the current squad, and perhaps ever.  We have locks and props to burn,  as well with the best hooker in the world with Bongi as the backup. 
    Coenie Oosthuizen and Thomas the Tank are tight heads with Beast and Kitchoff both world-class looseheads. 
    Coenie is effective at the breakdown and in loose play. Trevor Nykani can cover both sides of the scrum so he is a certainty. 
    Ezetebeth, Mostert, RJ Snyman, Stephanie. Lood Jager, 

    Our rolling maul is back after limited use over the prior 2 years.
    Scrums have been good, and lineouts have also been good.Kickoffs have been solid, but for some reason, Delande takes most of these.
    Loose forwardsVermeulen is clearly still a top quality player. Whiteley is returning who could do well in the open running game the Boks are playing.
    Kolisi is solid, not the same form as his best tests last year.
    With Marx and Vermeulen the breakdown should go well. Kolisi was having more effect at the breakdown today than last week. 
    Stephanie has been solid as a loose forward and strengthens the scrum, lineout and kick off's. He is relatively mobile and his work rate is good 
    Center is problematic with no ideal candidates for inside or outside the centre. Esterhuizen is a strong defender, ball carrier and ok in distribution. 
    Flyhalf and scrum-half have depth issues. Defence out wide is a problem, especially on the left side.
    CL
    clevermikeCoach57,555 posts
    17 Jun 2018, 00:07
    #4
    17 Jun 2018, 00:07#4

    Mozart would be extremely disappointed with a number 3 ranking - his previous postings on the issue was used to support the geriatrics selected by his hero (Meyer) having SA at 3.     

    MO
    MozartCaptain49,914 posts
    17 Jun 2018, 02:05
    #5
    17 Jun 2018, 02:05#5
    Number 2.
    CL
    clevermikeCoach57,555 posts
    17 Jun 2018, 09:22
    #6
    17 Jun 2018, 09:22#6

    SA long before the disaster set in 2014 and the string of losses in 2015 up to Japan - which put SA at no 6, SA was no 2 from tine to time but mostly no 3.   Face facts - the Springboks were bad in the EOYT in 2014 and in 2015 - the rot set in because of the elderly players badly under-performing and there was no game plan and no replacement strategy for players in place.

    But then you could never really explain what went wrong with Meyer as coach an his legacy and now claim the Springboks at he end of his term was no 2 - which was not the case and in fact an outright lie, which in fact is normal with you.        

    WA
    WardadPro6,663 posts
    17 Jun 2018, 11:43
    #7
    17 Jun 2018, 11:43#7

    Congrats to the Boks on a fine win ,a few naysayers with omelette face but I guess they will still take the win eh ?

    ABs played a crap game but still got it done so we will take that ,looked like they got their heads in the wrong place after the card and just lost cohesion .

    Bad luck Aussies but congrats to the USA on their maiden win vs a tier one nation.And why is nobody howling about the Irish getting away with taking out Genia off the ball ? 

    CL
    clevermikeCoach57,555 posts
    17 Jun 2018, 11:55
    #8
    17 Jun 2018, 11:55#8

    Wardad

    I was a bit disappointed with the performance of the AB's yesterday.   Theys eem to have lost cohesion at times and that make them look nothing better than satisfactory playing t he 14 man French.

    I think the AB's in the next test would be better/ 

    PL
    PlumCaptain21,007 posts
    17 Jun 2018, 12:04
    #9
    17 Jun 2018, 12:04#9

    @ WD

    Only watched the second half of the Irish game so didn't see the off the ball hit.

    Saw Genia had a sling on his arm while on the bench. Was that from the hit?

    The commentators in the AB game mentioned it can be tricky playing against 14 as you tend to loose your structure. I agree with that and it was apparent yesterday.

    Still, gonna be an interesting RC. Not dissing the ABs but they do look a tad off the boil.

    WA
    WardadPro6,663 posts
    17 Jun 2018, 16:37
    #10
    17 Jun 2018, 16:37#10

    ABs will get it sorted ,Genia was hit by Cian Healy off the ball but once again the Irish get away with it .

    The ABs dropped down a gear or two and were quite sluggish apart from the quick 2 tries after the card.

    CE
    CeradynePro9,374 posts
    17 Jun 2018, 17:15
    #11
    17 Jun 2018, 17:15#11
    So, the nett result up to the result between the USA and Scotland saw SA move from 7 to 5. I checked the rankings calculator when I saw this thread and saw that third was out of the question. I decided to wait for the end of the weekend’s internationals and see what the result with be with all the final scores confirmed. Google “World Rugby Rankings Calculator”.
    CL
    clevermikeCoach57,555 posts
    17 Jun 2018, 17:24
    #12
    17 Jun 2018, 17:24#12

    Can you calculate anything dumbo?   The official from World Rugby knows nothing - our resident BSter and Village I diot is a world expert om everything.

    Apologize pm site for your comments about Erasmus - fool   

    sharkbok
    sharkbokCaptain23,255 posts
    17 Jun 2018, 17:33
    #13
    17 Jun 2018, 17:33#13
    @Ceradyne- It did seem like a big jump for winning 2 tests. The only way I thought it could have been possible is because England has a high ranking, and the Boks had a low ranking. 
    I tried that calculator- ticking the most recent results. However, it did not seem to have any effect afterwards. Also not sure it has been labelled well as it says last week was the prior update- even when the boxes are ticked to include the most recent matches.

    CE
    CeradynePro9,374 posts
    17 Jun 2018, 17:42
    #14
    17 Jun 2018, 17:42#14

    @Sharkbok, the old IRB website used to have a link to this calculator: http://irbrankingcalculator.azurewebsites.net/ but you will note that it now redirect you to this one which automatically completes the latest results.

    My advice to ou Sopdoos Maaikie is to crawl back into his hole and go make passionate love to himself.

    CL
    clevermikeCoach57,555 posts
    17 Jun 2018, 18:03
    #15
    17 Jun 2018, 18:03#15

    Ag foeitog - dofdoos cannot even find an original insult    

    CE
    CeradynePro9,374 posts
    17 Jun 2018, 18:05
    #16
    17 Jun 2018, 18:05#16
    How’s your calculations of the world rugby rankings coming along ou sopdoos?
    MO
    MozartCaptain49,914 posts
    17 Jun 2018, 19:17
    #17
    17 Jun 2018, 19:17#17
    Eina...no apology though.
    CE
    CeradynePro9,374 posts
    18 Jun 2018, 16:37
    #18
    18 Jun 2018, 16:37#18

    Hey, Riversdale Sopdoos. Che ck this out:

    Boks jump 2 spots in rankings - but not to 3rd

    Top 20 in the current World Rugby rankings:

    1. New Zealand 93.99
    2. Ireland 89.20
    3. Wales 85.94
    4. Australia 85.41
    5. South Africa 84.65
    6. England 84.35
    7. Scotland 81.83
    8. France 79.10
    9. Fiji 78.51
    10. Argentina 76.73
    11. Japan 74.20
    12. Georgia 74.18
    13. Italy 72.56
    14. Tonga 71.88
    15. USA 71.39
    16. Romania 68.25
    17. Samoa 68.24
    18. Uruguay 65.37
    19. Russia 64.89
    20. Spain 63.09

    How are your own expert calculations coming along, compared to those that I posted?

    BR
    BrycyPro4,671 posts
    18 Jun 2018, 18:52
    #19
    18 Jun 2018, 18:52#19

    ...SA up and down like a toilet seat


    TH
    TheTraditionalistPro4,003 posts
    18 Jun 2018, 19:13
    #20
    18 Jun 2018, 19:13#20

    Shows the quality of the ranking system.

    The ranking yields one and one only piece of information: it takes quality to stay number one over several years.

    The rest... Tomorrow, 3rd, next day 5th etc

    Loser rugby nations playing each other, must be one winner, must lead to a ranking.

    CE
    CeradynePro9,374 posts
    18 Jun 2018, 19:28
    #21
    18 Jun 2018, 19:28#21
    Focus Trad, focus.
    sharkbok
    sharkbokCaptain23,255 posts
    18 Jun 2018, 19:40
    #22
    18 Jun 2018, 19:40#22
    If the Boks win this weekend, from what I understand - the Boks will gain little to no points because England is now below the Boks.
    However, if England wins, the Boks will certainly drop to 6th.

    If Australia lose,  and the Boks win- the Boks should go to 4th. 

    Not sure if Wales are playing this weekend, but if they were to lose, with the Boks winning and Austalia losing- the Boks could potentially go to third. 

    #TeamPoints1New Zealand93.992Ireland89.203Wales85.944Australia85.415South Africa84.656England84.357Scotland81.838France79.109Fiji78.5110Argentina76.7311Japan74.2012Georgia74.1813Italy72.56
    CE
    CeradynePro9,374 posts
    18 Jun 2018, 22:19
    #23
    18 Jun 2018, 22:19#23
    @SB. You can play around with permutations on that calculator to see what happens. You have mentioned that if SA win and Aus lose again this weekend...... I just used the exact same scores from the past weekend to see what would happen. I know that it is highly unlikely to happen (an exact repeat of the scores) but I just wanted to see what effect of a win for SA and a loss for Aus would be. You are correct. It will see SA move up to four ahead of Aus in five.
    MO
    MozartCaptain49,914 posts
    19 Jun 2018, 02:04
    #24
    19 Jun 2018, 02:04#24
    Well Vlag you may think those rankings are right, but Soppie has his own reality and deserves a chance to defend his claim that the Boks are third. The floor is yours Tokkie, educate us.
    MO
    MozartCaptain49,914 posts
    19 Jun 2018, 04:25
    #25
    19 Jun 2018, 04:25#25
    Come now Tokkie, it can't be that complicated....lay out your calculations. But if you were just wrong as usual....do apologize to Vlag
    BL
    bluebokPro3,977 posts
    19 Jun 2018, 08:02
    #26
    19 Jun 2018, 08:02#26

    Mike, although the report in the opening post of this site was misleading regarding the rankings, you still got it wrong, and attacked Cera unprovoked. A real man would apologise. Are you a real man? 

    — END OF THREAD —

    More from Rugby

    More news