FIXTURESNo upcoming fixtures — check back soon.
FORUM / RUGBY /  Boks lack Big Match Temperament - Matfield; Planet Rugby

Boks lack Big Match Temperament - Matfield; Planet Rugby

Started by Just_win10 REPLIES127 VIEWS· 02 Oct 2014, 09:27
SHAREXFACEBOOKWHATSAPPTELEGRAMREDDITLINKEDIN
JW
Just_winCaptain18,570 posts
02 Oct 2014, 09:27
#1
02 Oct 2014, 09:27#1

A step-up in big match temperament is all the Springboks need to get that long overdue victory against the All Blacks, says lock Victor Matfield.

South Africa's most decorated Test rugby player would also not be told that the top ranked side in the world is unbeatable and that it would be important for his team to prepare for the big showdown as they would for any other opponent.

Matfield said that the All Blacks have mastered the art of coming out on top in critical moments and that they were able to reach that point because of the solid belief structure in their team.

"They are pulling off the big moments in games," he said.

"If you look throughout the year, there were probably three, four Test matches that they could have lost that they came through and they pulled it off and that probably shows the character and the belief in the team.

"Belief is a funny thing, the more you win, it starts becoming a habit and I think it is a habit with them and they have only lost one game in 42 games and that is unbelievable.

"They know how to pull through tough games as well, so that is probably the one thing that stands out for me."

Addressing the understandable hype that follows the All Blacks wherever they go, the Springbok vice-captain felt that a more relaxed approach in the build-up would best serve their cause.

"The most important thing is, and I know it sounds like a cliché, but you have to do the same things you would do against Australia (for example)," he said.

"Sometimes you can overdo everything, get guys in to talk to the players. I think we just need to get out there and have our normal week be pretty low key and when the game starts I think everyone will be ready.

"You just need to go through your stuff, do your homework and make sure you know everything so that when you go on the pitch you can go and deliver."

Part of Matfield's homework as the sergeant in charge of the line-out calls would be to take a closer look at key individuals like Brodie Retallick who has been sensational for the New Zealanders in all facets of play.

There is, however, chance that the lock forward might miss the Rugby Championship showdown in Johannesburg due to injury which saw him sit out most of training this week.

Not that a change in personnel would make that big a difference to Matfield's mindset.

"He's been outstanding the whole year, he brings a lot more than just the line-outs for them. It will be a big blow for them if he doesn't play, but then they do have a lot of depth."

By Michael Mentz

JW
Just_winCaptain18,570 posts
02 Oct 2014, 09:29
#2
02 Oct 2014, 09:29#2
" Lack BMT"- not what you want to hear before a big test.
3K
3ku1Pro2,580 posts
02 Oct 2014, 09:33
#3
02 Oct 2014, 09:33#3
 I concur wee matfeild
JW
Just_winCaptain18,570 posts
02 Oct 2014, 09:36
#4
02 Oct 2014, 09:36#4
3ku1: I think some posters under estimate the value of weee Matfield
BE
Beeno1Captain40,032 posts
02 Oct 2014, 10:54
#5
02 Oct 2014, 10:54#5
What the Boks lack is a second lock to partner Etzebeth. A major problem the Boks have had for over a decade of the matfiled debacle.
What the Boks have often lacked is a competent unbiased ref. We have been the better side on many occassions and still lost due to ref blunders.
Some oaks like cerudunce windpomp are so brow beaten they will accept the many bad calls against the Boks and then blame the Boks for a loss. 
The wee abs are way overhyped and their very cynical approach to rugby is a disgrace.Consider if they had lost all the matches over the last three years that they should have lost. Would they be ranked 3 in the world!
All refs need to have a course on how to spot illegal ab play (The cynical abs have so many illlegal plays it wouyld takle a course bwahahhahahahahaha).   Also all refs need to agree to regular forensic audits as part of their employment contracts. 
We need action not continual talk about incompetent refs favouring the wee abs. 

Beeno as always giving kbbs and some mise rable fellow travellors some much needed perspective.




CE
CeradynePro9,374 posts
02 Oct 2014, 16:15
#6
02 Oct 2014, 16:15#6
 I have read the article twice and the quote a lot of things Matfield has said, but nowhere do they quote him as actually saying that the Boks lack Big Match Temperament. Creative journalism?
CL
clevermikeCoach57,555 posts
02 Oct 2014, 16:53
#7
02 Oct 2014, 16:53#7
 Doffies
Do you actually understand English?   You read the article and you missed the first sentence - " step-up in big match temperament is all the Springboks need to get that long overdue victory against the All Blacks, says lock Victor Matfield."
If a "step up" is needed there is a deficiency - but then we have had the perennial match loser Morne Steyn to contend with and that means no stepup would have been of any help while he was around.    
CE
CeradynePro9,374 posts
02 Oct 2014, 18:14
#8
02 Oct 2014, 18:14#8
 Uhmmmm. That is the title of the article, poepol. Do you see any quotation marks? I don't see any. Not even in the original article. Here, have a look for yourself. http://www.planetrugby.com/story/0,25883,3561_9498086,00.html

That is the way that PlanetRugby, and all of the Planet.... sites report. They like to take things out of context and you have to read their stuff very carefully. I read a lot of their articles on their formula one website, PlanetF1. They write and article and then they give it an eye catching heading. Here is an example:

The heading:
Sebastian Vettel surprised by aggression of Lewis Hamilton's move for Singapore win


This the article:

After his third and final pit-stop, Hamilton passed Vettel with seven laps remaining into Turn Six-Seven with scarcely the width of a tyre between the wall and the Englishman’s Mercedes as he surged through. The move was surprisingly risky given that Hamilton, on a fresh set of tyres, had such a vast speed advantage over a Red Bull running on worn-out rubber.

“I wasn’t quite sure what he was doing,” admitted Vettel afterwards. "It seemed like he couldn’t wait to get back into the lead! But here was no point fighting because I didn’t have the tyres to fight him.”

Hamilton himself admitted afterwards that he could have chosen a more judicious opportunity to claim back the lead.

"I came out alongside Ricciardo but I knew that those guys' tyres were going to be destroyed and the car had been feeling great all day, so if I couldn't get past on fresh tyres I'd be pretty useless!" Hamilton told Sky Sports F1.

"But the thing is they [the team] said don't take any risks. So that was on my mind but I thought Sebastian was going to defend or race me. I got a good exit out of Turn Five and I was going for it. It was close - I came through and I was like 'whoa, that was close!"

The Briton more bluntly added in later interviews: “I didn’t pick the perfect time to do it.”

With the move nonetheless completed with the minimum of fuss, Hamilton swiftly re-opened a 13-second lead over the closing six laps to win a race which could prove a key turning point in the Briton's title battle with team-mate Nico Rosberg.


Nowhere does Vettel say that he was surprised by Hamilton. That is the Planet way or reporting.


CL
clevermikeCoach57,555 posts
02 Oct 2014, 20:40
#9
02 Oct 2014, 20:40#9
 Dofdoos the zewomoron
That is wht Matfield said - you plank.   Whether it is the title of the story - or in the body makes no bloody difference,  dofdoos.   
CE
CeradynePro9,374 posts
02 Oct 2014, 21:59
#10
02 Oct 2014, 21:59#10
There is nothing confirming that he has in fact said it. If you accept that at face value then you have a lot to learn about reading reports like this. Anybody accepting something just like that is very naive, IMO. I am very careful when reading opinions and I am also very careful when assessing an article. If you look at the parts where Matfield was quoted, you can see that he did not at any stage even hinted at the team lacking BMT. Nothing. All that he has said was that the All Blacks are used to winning, which make it easy for them to approach games with the right attitude.

The Boks would not have been able to win any games, or they would have won very little games if they suffered from a lack of BMT. A side that are in second position on the world rankings cannot lack BMT.

If they lacked BMT, they would totally have fallen apart in Wellington when the battled to get possession and territory advantage. A team that lacked BMT would not have pushed to end up a mere 4 points adrift of the All Blacks in an away game where they only saw 39% of the ball and 39% of the territory advantage, let alone limit the All Blacks to one solitary try in a low scoring game.

Nee boet, that reporter is your kind of guy. Someone who takes something that someone else has said and then totally twist  it around to suit his own agenda. If Matfield has really said that the Boks lack BMT, he would have written it as a quotation in quotation marks.
AG
AgPleezDeddyClub Pro900 posts
03 Oct 2014, 00:31
#11
03 Oct 2014, 00:31#11
This match against the AB's is huge, even though the RC is already gone, we must beat them. The psychological damage another loss would do is massive, we need to prove it can be done. I would take the scrappiest 3-0 in these circumstances.
— END OF THREAD —

More from Rugby

More news