FIXTURESNo upcoming fixtures — check back soon.
FORUM / RUGBY /  Boks were the better side in 3 of the last 4 test versus the wee abs

Boks were the better side in 3 of the last 4 test versus the wee abs

Started by Beeno116 REPLIES442 VIEWS· 08 Oct 2013, 10:54
SHAREXFACEBOOKWHATSAPPTELEGRAMREDDITLINKEDIN
BE
Beeno1Captain40,032 posts
08 Oct 2013, 10:54
#1
08 Oct 2013, 10:54#1

The cold facts speak for themselves. The Dunedin tests where only a meltdown resulting in 9 penaties beng missed cost the Boks the game (Never mind the two butchered tries - man we were 20 points the better side!).

The infamous Roman Poitre test where the Boks played with 14 men for 50 minutes of the game and lost by 7 points - the first ab try was not atry as the ball was never seen to be groundd and the abs never celebrated the try.


Re this last test consider the following:


No Flip as he was suspended but the far worse offence by the serial thug nonu was unpunished. Flip left a big hole in the grunt aspect and in the lineouts. We were back to the bad old matfield days where we had 4 tight forwards. This had a massive impact on the game. (Bekker off to Japan came home to bite as well)


Then Alberts gets injured and on comes the quota player Kolisi! Another problem. 

The the most dangerous back on the field, Habana, goes off injured. I would not have bet against Bryan scoring two more tries in this free flowing game. Incredibly bad luck. A match decider.

The for some weird reason Bissie gets subbed at a crucial point where a try was on.

As snaspter says we also created more try scoring opportunities than the abs and were desparately unlucky more tries were not scored. 

We dominated territory and possession.

Can one seriously think the abs are a better side. What utter rubbish!!

Man it was a travesty that this and the two other matches were not won.


Seldom have I read so much twaddle and contradictory remarks. Abs miles ahead is one heading. Best test ever is another. Face facts it would have not been a great test if the boks were not good. 


The simple facts are the results in the last 4 tests bears little resemblance to the rugby played. The writing on the wall has morphed into capitals. 2014 the Boks take over as number 1 team in the world. abs luck simply cannot hold. Refs are also getting ontp them it seems and Nigel has done us all a huge favour by sending off messam for redzone infringements. Mcaaaw was nodescript on the day possibly due to Nigel's beady eye being on him. As Mike says very weak perfomnce from this overhyped ala matfield player -his groupies only have to see him on the field to go into a swoon ala Cloudy!

I note that Keo has sharp words for ben franks re his stiff arm on Coenie - it was he said "cowardly, shallow and a shocker"  - much worse than Beast's nudge re wee maccaaaw.


Now no doubt we will hear outraged bleats from puffed up but deluded kiwi bird brains and, I am afraid, some deluded bending over backwards Bok fans trying desparately to avoid being called whingers etc.

However Beeno is made of firmer metal and, as always, cares not a fig for these childish jibes and remains faithful to the facts - as always. The abs are overated and that's a fact. They should have lost 3 of the last 4 test against the Boks.  FACT.

Boks are the better side - end of story.


I appeal to all ab fans to accept the simply truth and end the charade. mcaaaw is a fable and this has to be realised as well. Mike thanks for pointing out via the stats how poor mcaaaw was. I didnt myself need telling as as I watched the game. I swear if he played five minutes the groupies would be screaming for him to be man of the match -its insane stuff! bwahahahhahahahaha


Hoping that this bit of Beeno realism will help the deluded kiwi bird brains come back to reality but I am not too sanguine about that!! As for bok fans afraid of being called whingers time for them to fnd a back bone and also to get real. Follow Beeno's fine example oaks.

Now I am off to see the tax man who owes me plenty but I needed to set the record straight as there have been to many nauseating comments made around here just lately. M an how folk cant see the wood from the trees at times!




  



MO
moolaaPro2,380 posts
08 Oct 2013, 11:04
#2
08 Oct 2013, 11:04#2
 Care to go back and read what your initial post(s) were after the game Hasbeeno?
BE
Beeno1Captain40,032 posts
08 Oct 2013, 11:13
#3
08 Oct 2013, 11:13#3
 mooooo  la it is sporting to congratulate the winning side but when one analysis the game the facts are obvious to any but the most one eyed supporter. The writing is on the wall and it is becoming more obvious all the time. 

Beeno just giving advance warning.
HA
hakwaPro4,146 posts
08 Oct 2013, 11:18
#4
08 Oct 2013, 11:18#4
 2 days ago
2 days ago
BA
black adderClub Pro196 posts
08 Oct 2013, 11:28
#5
08 Oct 2013, 11:28#5

 Beanob we're shaking in our boots after demolishing you at Ellis Park with only 14 men.

Poor Beanob , reality not being one of his strengths.Got to admire someone that can type while wearing a straightjacket though.

BE
Beeno1Captain40,032 posts
08 Oct 2013, 11:32
#6
08 Oct 2013, 11:32#6
black udder keep your head buried in the sand but it wont protect you from reality.I note not single point I made has been refuted .
Game set and match to Beeno once again.
Now allow me to depart and see if I can get a nice refund from the bandits called SARS!

BA
black adderClub Pro196 posts
08 Oct 2013, 11:53
#7
08 Oct 2013, 11:53#7

 Beanob...the All Blacks did all the talking for us on Saturday night.

Remind me again the last time the Springboks even beat the All Blacks. It's so long ago I think it must've been before my time.

South African franchises form in the Super XV rugby comp should have alerted you to what was going to be the inevitable result at Ellis Park.

Next year will be no different .

 

NU
nukefreekiwiClub Pro441 posts
08 Oct 2013, 12:21
#8
08 Oct 2013, 12:21#8
I've been waiting for the inevitable apologetics from the Bokke fanboys and wannabean has not disappointed. I'm just surprised it's taken so long for him to manufacture this hilarious piece of revisionist drivel.  I imagine beano is a Holocaust denier too. When wannabeans grandchildren read their sporting almanacs in the distant future they will be overwhelmed with the shocking realisation that their grandfathers tales of Bokke supremacy, of our current era, are just the pathetic ramblings of a confused and bitter old man. 
WA
WardadPro6,663 posts
08 Oct 2013, 13:13
#9
08 Oct 2013, 13:13#9
 Beanhead heres some cold hard fac ts for you last 9 games 8 of them to the ABS ,all that other drivel is what you were droning on about last year .remember last year ? you thought you won then too ! And the year before that and so on .1 win since 2009 against the ABS is pretty sad .Like you .And your losing battle with sanity.
PO
polyboyClub Pro601 posts
08 Oct 2013, 14:38
#10
08 Oct 2013, 14:38#10
 Beeno this lengthy tirade has to have been written by you while you were crying tears at losing again, after the 1st sentence I just kept thinking "Cry me a F...n river". You no longer have any credibility, especially when the Boks themselves, the SA rugby public, the international media and rugby world have acknowledged that the AB's were the superior team. There was even an article on Keo.za.co that the AB's faced several disadvantages with travel, crowd and venue not to mention 2 yellow cards and still won in a stadium that was a reputed Bok stronghold...because they were better and also they had a superior bench. So rant all you want its more entertainment value as your rugby knowledge is negligible.
RO
RooinekCaptain18,117 posts
08 Oct 2013, 15:25
#11
08 Oct 2013, 15:25#11
Baboon-ou, this is cringeworthy even by your standards.

I am quite sure I speak for all Springbok supporters when I say that you are an embarrassment. Please find some other team to support or else just stick to commenting on your pathetic Stompies. Thanks!
HA
hakwaPro4,146 posts
08 Oct 2013, 15:42
#12
08 Oct 2013, 15:42#12
 come on lads, you know Beano was just stirring the pot and might I add...he was very successful - well done Beens - we ALL took the bait, hook, line and sinker LOL!
CL
clevermikeCoach57,555 posts
08 Oct 2013, 16:13
#13
08 Oct 2013, 16:13#13

Beeno

 

Get real and forget about day dreaming or pie in the sky theories.   There is no way that we were ever better than the AB's was this  year.

 

The reason is that we had players with serious deficiencies in certain aspects of the game with the result that team performances were limited and uncompetitive.   If these were not in existence - I would say that the contest would have been much closer.  I would say those deficiencies are -

 

*   limitations in the play of Kirchner - bearing in mind also his deficient display in defence;

 

*   although he is really a wonderful attacking player - and in that way was more dangerous than any of the All Blacks backline players - Willie le Roux needs to up his defence drastically and must work on it;

 

*  the poor defence of Morne and his indecisiveness on which options to follow in certain phases of play;

 

*  the serious limitations in what Alberts can produce as a loosie as a result of lack of mobility and consequential deficiencies in all round performance as a loosie;

 

*  the fact that Kruger has gone AWOL during the match and whenever he was noticeable - he buggered up badly; and

 

*   the need to have at least a lock partner and a loosie who are really competitive in line out performance. 

 

The above indicate the need for at least four changes to he team and those changes would help in improving the team to a level more competitive with the AB's.   Without those changes we will never be competitive or near the level of the AB's

 

 

HA
hakwaPro4,146 posts
08 Oct 2013, 16:17
#14
08 Oct 2013, 16:17#14
 for a more objective view please read Biltongbek's article on my Post "Meyer to carry on"
BE
Beeno1Captain40,032 posts
09 Oct 2013, 00:46
#15
09 Oct 2013, 00:46#15
Please oaks can you concentrate on the facts I presented and not the figments of your imagination? ThanksBoks were the better side in three of the last 4 test.Prior to this we have been robbed blind in countless tests. Hence the numerous articles of refs favouring abs etc. ab rugby dominance is a manipulated myth.   Anyone thinking the abs were better on saturday is a halfwit. Territory, possession, try scoring opportunities, etc etc showed the Boks as being superior. The better side lost - FACT




CL
clevermikeCoach57,555 posts
09 Oct 2013, 00:52
#16
09 Oct 2013, 00:52#16

Beeno

 

The better defending side won - the poorer defending side lost.   The botched defence by the Springbok cause them to lose the game.   By proper defence they could have prevented at least three  of the AB's tries - that is the fact of life. 

JW
Just_winCaptain18,570 posts
09 Oct 2013, 01:02
#17
09 Oct 2013, 01:02#17
Beeno, the scoreboard is the indicator most people use to assess who was the better side. 
No matter how you crunch those numbers the scoreboard remains the same. 
Your ever helpful mate,
Just_win (but fairly of course )

— END OF THREAD —

More from Rugby

More news