the again, never say never.
Oh, no, never can be said in this case.
The OP sets two stories side by side when they have nothing in common.
The quota couple was punished without them infringing any code of conduct, rules, laws etc
SA rugby can afford punishing people on no ground for what were an innocuous situation that should have never been made public and if it were, nothing prevented SA rugby from not punishing the couple as they infringed nothing and keep it as it is: a private matter.
Punishing them comes with no consequences though.
Cocaine use is a different case. It is a massive infringement. And this ensures nothing happens.
The newspaper may have all the strongest elements in the world, nothing will happen as SA rugby can not afford a cocaine use reveal.
At worst, a quota player will be thrown under the bus and word of rugby will come out of the woods to regret the situation and hammer the very fact that this was a isolated case, that cocaine use is not wide spread amongst SA rugby players.
In fact, the leak may come from SA rugby themselves. There may be players who have started to no longer use cocaine as a performance boost but for off game use on a regular basis. This would send a warning to those players, knowing that SA rugby have the luxury to send one of them under the bus.
They must curb their consumption and stick to use cocaine as a performance booster.
Never is a correct approximation. Maybe in 50 years, a guy will spill the beans. And yet.