Boks who missed more than one tackle....

Hougaard 3....Revised Hougaard 4 Allende 2 Habana 3....Revised Habana 4 Steyn 5.... Faf 4 Stephanie 3....Revised Stephanie 2 Mbonami 2 (zero made) Whiteley 2 Kriel 2....Revised Kriel 3 Mapoe 2 ( zero made).....Revised Kriel 1 Additional Revised numbers Lambie 2 De Jongh 3 Alberts 2 If you are looking for reasons why we yielded vast territory to NZ look no further Revised numbers issued later on the NZ Herald site..

This was the worst tackling ever by a Bok team. Not sure if it motivation, confidence or just no semblance of a game plan. 

Graeme Henry commented near the start of the season that he has never seen the Boks so lacklustre in commitment. 

"What was alarming for me in the Bok loss to the Irish was the total lack of passion and commitment for the jersey,”Henry wrote.

“In my time as All Black coach we played against Bok teams that we knew didn't have the talent and skills of us, but by g.., you knew you were in for an absolute war. That fire and pride seems to be dying slowly and I am struggling to understand why. A once feared opponent and now they are struggling to compete with top tier nations..."

Henry is spot on. In the middle of this debacle Koch was on the sidelines laughing as if it was all a big joke. No pride. No heart, I can't think of one Bok who looked like he believed we could win, got angry, raised his game....competed in any way. Losing like this rips the guts out of fan support.

 Something like 16 missed tackles before half time.
Thank heavens we had a well organised defensive back line ... right Mozart?
Would hate to see it in complete disarray.

 Well maybe he's not such a bright guy if he is "struggling to under stand why"

 Agreed BBF.

 Fuckile Mabula's presence on the field might have disheartened the boks.

 When wus he on the field ?

What got my goat was that all Blacks make it look so simple to break out of their 22 while being under pressure. If you consider they had scramble back and was still able to get more numbers. We simply failed to pin them in their half. I also felt we were to light in the back line. Hougaard slip off twice one on one against noholo

 So overall, the white players missed more tackles than the black ones?

 Where is De Jongh - Mozart - he missed 3?   Do you left him out since you elsewhere made the same stupid/lying observation that he missed only 1 tackle.   if you give stats give all of them.
Then add one more issue - give the missed tackle ratio as well.   De Jongh's missed tackle ratio was 20% - De Allende's was about half of that,   
Do your homework before you try and mislead members - it will not work.         

 Why so much black talk all of the sudden hakwa???

 Yeah Clevermike, Kriel was one of the best tacklers out there, stopping just about everything coming his way (and cleaning up other peoples' mess)...

Those numbers don't do justice.

Steyn was more worried diving, punching, holding and slapping players everytime he wasn't kicking!

 Quackie
Kriel made 18 tackles missing 2 and Mozart makes a huge noise about missed tackles.   De Allende made 14 tackles missing 2 - also very acceptable figure. 
But you must realize that nobody can rely on Mozart for any rugby info.  He mentioned Kriel - but did not mention Alberts - wh o made 7 tackles - but missed 2.    

 Exactly, he shouldn't hide those stats, 18 tackles for Kriel and 14 for Allende is huge!! :o

 That's the way Mozart operates.
You'll get used to it. 
Think for yourself. 
Dismiss his conjured nonsense for the rubbish it us. 
  

 Perspective!
Louw made 3 tackles and missed one.  Kriel in half the time made 18 and missed 3..
Simply displaying the missed tackles (although it is grave) means nothing if not compared to those made.
Also, Habana moved from his line almost every time, thus he was not even there to attempt a tackle..

"Kriel in half the time made 18 and missed 3"

Your math sucks!

Louw was on for 12 minutes, Kriel for 68...

 Still made those EIGHTEEN tackles, so doesn't matter xD

 The problem is that Mozart is still lying about De Jongh and Alberts missed tackles and he is not prepared to give the missed tackle ratio's of the various players.   That makes the thread a serious joke.   

My guess is that the Boks appear to have no pride when in fact they are running around clueless as there is no actual game plan in place.......Coetzee knows we should be playing attacking rugby but his way is the conservative way so my guess is that the instructions to the team lack conviction and with that the players are headless and playing with no authority or confidence.
The very same players for instance playing for the Lions, play with conviction and confidence as they know the structure........there is no seamless transition to test rugby.
With the AB's the transition from provincial to test is seamless.