FIXTURESNo upcoming fixtures — check back soon.
FORUM / RUGBY /  breakdown sharks vs crusaders preview,,,

breakdown sharks vs crusaders preview,,,

Started by Monkey D Luffy3 REPLIES231 VIEWS· 04 Apr 2013, 19:19
SHAREXFACEBOOKWHATSAPPTELEGRAMREDDITLINKEDIN
MD
Monkey D LuffyPro6,277 posts
04 Apr 2013, 19:19
#1
04 Apr 2013, 19:19#1
Sharks v Crusaders Super Rugby Preview

Israel Dagg scores for the Crusaders at Twickenham


Out of the last six Super Rugby matches between the Sharks and the Crusaders the men from Christchurch have won six and the Sharks none.

 

The Sharks have a dismal record against the Crusaders as they have played them 16 and lost 14 times or 87.5% of these matches.

 

The last time the Sharks tasted victory against the Crusaders as way back in 2007 and they reached the final. Ruan Pienaar slotted a late conversion to edge the Sharks one point ahead.

 

The Sharks and the Crusaders missed out on playing each other last year due to the draw so the last time they met was in the elimination play off in 2011.

 

On average when the Sharks play the Crusaders the score is Sharks 22 Crusaders 33.

 

The Sharks have hosted the Crusaders 6 times in Durban and won twice. That translates to the Crusaders winning 67% of their matches in Durban.

 

The average score when the Sharks play the Crusaders in Durban is Sharks 24 Crusaders 28.

 

The Sharks had a bye last week but before the bye they played the Rebels and won 64-7. A week before that they were hammered themselves 10-29 by the Brumbies.

 

It would be foolish to think that the Rebels victory was any evidence that the Sharks had solved all of their problems.

 

The Crusaders will be playing their fourth South African franchise this weekend so they should be familiar with the style of game.

 

Last week the Crusaders surprised many by beating the Stormers in Cape Town which has led to them being tipped this week. However it must not be forgotten that the Crusaders are in their second week on tour which many players say is when the fatigue kicks in.

 

The Crusaders have made four changes (one was a late change) for this match. Corey Flynn injured his eye so he had to withdraw and Codie Taylor had to fly out an join the replacements bench which is hardly ideal.

 

The Crusaders have been in top form lately but we are concerned about the fatigue. The Sharks can be expected to start slowly given last week's bye but as the match wears on they should get stronger.

 

Last week the Crusaders shocked the Stormers but at the same time they also helped the Sharks preparations as they gave them an idea what to expect this week and they won't be able to pull a surprise like that again.


This match is a tough one to predict but we think the Sharks will edge this by one point.


This Match will be shown on TV in NZ, Aus, SA and in the UK on the Sky Sports website and Red button on SS2.


Average score:
Sharks 22 Crusaders 33


Last five results

25 Jun 2011 (playoff) Sharks v Crusaders 8-36 Nelson
27 Mar 2011 Sharks v Crusaders 28-44 Twickenham
26 Feb 2010 Sharks v Crusaders 6-35 Christchurch
18 Apr 2009 Sharks v Crusaders 10-13 Durban
02 May 2008 Sharks v Crusaders 10-18 Christchurch


overall record against the
Played 16Wins 2 Losses 14 Draws 0


Match
No.45.: Sharks v Crusaders
Date : Friday 5 April
Venue : Kings Park, Durban
Kick Off local: 19:10
Referee: Lourens van der Merwe
Assistant Ref 1:Marius Jonker
Assistant Ref 2:Reuben Rossouw
TMO : Deon van Blommestein

 

Teams


Sharks

1. Tendai Mtawarira , 2. Kyle Cooper , 3. Jannie du Plessis , 4. Pieter-Steph du Toit , 5. Franco van der Merwe , 6. Jacques Botes , 7. Marcell Coetzee , 8. Keegan Daniel (Captain) , 9. Cobus Reinach , 10. Patrick Lambie , 11. JP Pietersen , 12. Meyer Bosman , 13. Paul Jordaan , 14. Odwa Ndungane , 15. Francois Steyn

Replacements , 16. Craig Burden , 17. Wiehahn Herbst , 18. Anton Bresler , 19. Ryan Kankowski , 20. Charl McLeod , 21. Riaan Viljoen , 22. Louis Ludik / Bura Sithole


Crusaders

1. Wyatt Crockett 2. Ben Funnell, 3. Owen Franks 4. Luke Romano 5. Samuel Whitelock 6. George Whitelock (c) 7. Matt Todd 8. Luke Whitelock 9. Andy Ellis 10. Tyler Bleyendaal 11. Zac Guildford 12. Ryan Crotty 13. Robbie Fruean 14. Adam Whitelock 15. Tom Marshall

Replacements : 16.Codie Taylor 17. Joe Moody 18. Dominic Bird 19. Jordan Taufua 20. Willi Heinz 21. Telusa Veainu 22. Israel Dagg.

MD
Monkey D LuffyPro6,277 posts
04 Apr 2013, 19:33
#2
04 Apr 2013, 19:33#2

IMO the sharks are a much easier prospect then the stormers, but crusaders will be feeling the pinch in their 2nd week behind enemy lines, ontop of that they still have a horrendus injury toll which was slightly leviated with the return of dagg on the bench, but its even worse with corey flynn now ruled out after an eye injury during training. kin d of like one step forward and two steps back.

the crusaders have the edge when it comes to the two styles the teams play, sharks have been very disappointing from an attractive rugby point of veiw, but those considerations come a distant 2nd to the bottomline which is the win, so good on them i reckon.

sharks are coming of a bye last weekend, while the crusaders are coming of wicked no holds barred battle against the stormers. sharks have the edge when it comes to freshness & this IMO is the biggest area of concern.

im very worried about this match and the similarties between 2011 which i mentioned many times leading up to the stormers game, look set to continue this week.
in 2011 after an injury ravaged crusaders beat the stormers in newlands, they then went to bloomfintein where they lost tot he cheetahs, coincedntly the stormers also lost their next match against NZs 2011 wooden spooners the chiefs too.
i think the sharks have a slight edge over the crusaders, but crusaders as underdogs are stronger, so impicking the crusaders again. the biggest plus the saders have is the brand of rugby they are able to use and change when required, so i say crusaders by 4.


theres also the fact that this is SA last chance to beat the crusaders in 2011, stormers, bulls, cheetahs & kings have all lost to a kiwi team, while the crusaders have a chance to go undefeated against SA like the chiefs did last year.
hurricanes also have that opportunity, but thats a huge long shot considering they face the stormers & bulls at loftus, so its not something i wouldnt bet on.

GO THE CRUSADERS!!!
 

MO
MozartCaptain49,914 posts
04 Apr 2013, 20:28
#3
04 Apr 2013, 20:28#3

Unlike other NZ or Oz Super 15 teams, the Saders don't exclusively attack our teams via the backs. Which is why they have been so succesful. The Stormers outgained the Saders last week. It was the Saders work at the lineouts and rucks which won the match. The Sharks have a stronger front row than the Stormers , but certainly not a better lineout....although there was the Fourie factor. It's an even bet I'd say.

 

But it's time that  South African teams anticipate the very technical forward play the Saders and as a consequence Nz produces. Our packs are stronger, but often outsmarted.

MD
Monkey D LuffyPro6,277 posts
04 Apr 2013, 21:55
#4
04 Apr 2013, 21:55#4

@mozart,
i agree with that comment about the saders not exclusive to the attacking game, something that has been a trademark throughout super rugby, but i would also say that the chiefs are in the same boat, or at least they are starting to develop into a more rounded team. they love their attacking rugby (who dosent ,,,,,,except the stormers & sharks, LMAO, :oP), but they have also grinded out some wins, like the sharks game in durban last year and the crusaders in the finals.

u would be surprised to see how many teams actually outgain their oppoisition despite losing, it happens a lot more then it dosent.
saders lineouts & rucks were key with their win against the stormers,but defence and tyler blyndaals pin point accurate kicking played huge rolls too, the amount of time blyendaal reversed pressure thanks to his midas touch boot was unreal.

easy to identify the techinical aspects of the crusaders game which must be countered, but not so easy to execute the coubnter measures to negate those technical aspects.

i agree SA packs are usually stronger, but IMO  the gap in strength is not of a high enough level to be considered and advantage, on the other hand the mobility of the NZ forwards are more notable as is the general rugby nous.
sounds like a biased kiwi comment i know, but i really do believe that.

— END OF THREAD —

More from Rugby

More news