There is no such thing as loyalty between an employer and his employee.
The new kind of breed, so called patriots who desperately try to sell the idea that loyalty goes to the highest of the bidders.
A contract though is binding first and foremost to oneself. It is a written evidence of a commitment taken to oneself and not only to another party.
There is no difference in this regard between an employer and an employee. Their loyalty is measured the same.
Loyalty always is measured in cost: loyalty is a cost that one is ready to endure to remain an entire human being.
This SA rugby player is a SA rugby player through and through. He is duplicious.
He is greedy and does not accept himself as greedy.
He could have told in both cases that he loved the money and could not be bothered in his choice for lucrative offers.
Nope, in both cases, he failed to be loyal to himself, he had to spin tales, invent stories.
The anthem tells a lot: Other teams's players ooze respect, passion, pride, love for their country.
Nothing like that from SA rugby players: it may even be felt they wished they could have been born in another country.
They are guns for hire, sellswords, mercenaries... The product of a country that have been set the path of selling out for decades, if not a century.
SA rugby players lack the natural attachment that exists between people and their land.
They are a product of globalistic schemes, with no roots, no heart, no soul. Only greed to govern them, always to prone to sell themselves out to the first who pays one cent more.
