FIXTURESNo upcoming fixtures — check back soon.
FORUM / RUGBY /  Clueless Meyer - I've worked it out

Clueless Meyer - I've worked it out

Started by Saffolk 27 REPLIES434 VIEWS· 13 Jun 2014, 11:02
SHAREXFACEBOOKWHATSAPPTELEGRAMREDDITLINKEDIN
SA
Saffolk Captain30,741 posts
13 Jun 2014, 11:02
#1
13 Jun 2014, 11:02#1

This fool is selecting a bunch of geriatrics because he has not woken up from around 2008 when he would have been best placed to select these old farts in their prime.

 

 

He is so caught up in this time warp, picking his dream team of 2008, too fucking stupid to realise its 2014.

 

 

Meyer, w ake up you ignorant twit

BE
Beeno1Captain40,032 posts
13 Jun 2014, 11:20
#2
13 Jun 2014, 11:20#2
Hey snapster I see you also think Lancaster is getting it all wrong.Is there any international coach that is getting it right - in your eyes that is Hahahahahhahaha.
That said I feel Meyer has missed an opportunity to build the Boks. Dr Moz it's like American companies pumping up their stock values in the short term rather than doing what is right in the long term. Smart analogy which Dr Moz should appreciate! I fear though we risk the short term - we shall see.
RU
RugganutClub Pro183 posts
13 Jun 2014, 11:38
#3
13 Jun 2014, 11:38#3
New messenger called MSM.(Meyer-Saffex-Mugabe)
They all never listen to anyone and if you disagree with them you are an idiot. Joined at the hip, those three.  
BE
Beeno1Captain40,032 posts
13 Jun 2014, 11:54
#4
13 Jun 2014, 11:54#4
 Ag man ou ruganutter please! Mugabe has murdered tens of thousands of people and brought a country to ruin and poverty. 
Snapster just misu derstands rugby from time to time and vents a bit!
NT
ntangaClub Pro336 posts
13 Jun 2014, 12:03
#5
13 Jun 2014, 12:03#5
 Agree with you Beeno, Mugabe is in the league of his own, as the great cheat and murderer. 

 
BO
bobbok...Captain10,129 posts
13 Jun 2014, 12:04
#6
13 Jun 2014, 12:04#6
Rugnuts, your teeth, like your brain take the gap to perfection .
CL
CleanCutPro9,905 posts
13 Jun 2014, 12:17
#7
13 Jun 2014, 12:17#7
 
And where the hell have you been ntanga??
CL
CleanCutPro9,905 posts
13 Jun 2014, 12:18
#8
13 Jun 2014, 12:18#8
 
Hmmmmmm ... looks as if your not being appreciated today, hey Rugga!!!

Do you think it has anything to do with that amazing smile of yours?


SA
Saffolk Captain30,741 posts
13 Jun 2014, 12:34
#9
13 Jun 2014, 12:34#9

No Beenkop, I have little issue with Lancaster other than his loyalty to the players who did well against the AB's last week, thereby depriving his side of being at full strength given some of his best players are now available.

 

At least he is not stupid enough to recall Martin Johnson, Jason Leonard, Greenwood and Wilkinson to his current side  

BE
becsPro4,378 posts
13 Jun 2014, 13:02
#10
13 Jun 2014, 13:02#10
And he got rid of Tindell, so I think that proves a point beyond any shadow of a doubt  

As I said before, Saffex might be a determined soul who sticks to his guns come what may, as do some of the rest of us....I, in fact fight many a losing cause, so I am told , .....but to tar him with the same brush as Mugabe just renders every comment you make  pointless and worthless, such is the idiocy and crassness of that very statement. 
So I'd give it a rest if I were you and just taunt him in another more sensible way, if you feel the need ! 
CE
CeradynePro9,374 posts
13 Jun 2014, 13:36
#11
13 Jun 2014, 13:36#11
 yours?



Saffex

Status: Hall Of Fame 
Posts: 8071RE: Clueless Meyer - I've worked it out
June 13, 2014, 10:34:47

No Beenkop, I have little issue with Lancaster other than his loyalty to the players who did well against the AB's last week, thereby depriving his side of being at full strength given some of his best players are now available.

 

At least he is not stupid enough to recall Martin Johnson, Jason Leonard, Greenwood and Wilkinson to his current side 



Not too long ago we heard that this side was a joke and pathetic and an insult and, and, and........ Now suddenly the absence of some of those players equals depriving his side of being full strength.
BE
Beeno1Captain40,032 posts
13 Jun 2014, 13:58
#12
13 Jun 2014, 13:58#12
 Yes Natanga where have you been - you are one of the saner okes in the aslysum!
Glad to see you back.


SA
Saffolk Captain30,741 posts
13 Jun 2014, 14:24
#13
13 Jun 2014, 14:24#13
Vlagtwat....stop lying  
MO
MozartCaptain49,914 posts
13 Jun 2014, 15:16
#14
13 Jun 2014, 15:16#14
How about being stoopid enough to insist Burden was a strong candidate for Bok centre....Dave, Meyer has you  by 20 rugby IQ points. 
CE
CeradynePro9,374 posts
13 Jun 2014, 15:22
#15
13 Jun 2014, 15:22#15
 Saffex

Status: Hall Of Fame 
Posts: 8078RE: Clueless Meyer - I've worked it out
June 13, 2014, 12:24:12Vlagtwat....stop lying 


Struck a nerve.................?

SA
Saffolk Captain30,741 posts
13 Jun 2014, 15:29
#16
13 Jun 2014, 15:29#16

Moz, your problem is that you just speak a whole load of shit about what I have to say about players. Burden was a class U20 centre, I said at the time he was one of the best I had seen at that age group.......he then suffered a serious knee injury and that fool of a Dick Muir moved him to took hooker as a knee jerk reaction.......a year after that conversion, Burden showed he had not lost any of his pace.

 

My call was always that Burden should never have moved to hooker.......I NEVER said anything about him being a candidate for the Boks at 13, so as I said before, stop speaking shit.

 

As for Meyer and his 20 IQ points.........bullshit, he confirmed this year that he cant evolve, is way out of touch and pathetically bound by the class of 30 year old pluses.

 

I know more about team selections than he ever will

 

SA
Saffolk Captain30,741 posts
13 Jun 2014, 15:30
#17
13 Jun 2014, 15:30#17
No Vlag just pointing out that you are lying  
BE
becsPro4,378 posts
13 Jun 2014, 15:51
#18
13 Jun 2014, 15:51#18
Awww...what is it about SA Centres turned Hooker ? You have two very good ones and they are jolly sweet to boot  
Just thought I'd lighten the mood with some girly nonsense whilst I am here   
MO
MozartCaptain49,914 posts
13 Jun 2014, 15:53
#19
13 Jun 2014, 15:53#19

Nonsense Dave you were telling us Burden was a future Bok centre....just like you told us JJ was the best Bok 13 since Danie Gerber. Then there was your slavish loyalty to Wynand Olivier a centre who scored one try in 35 tests. And oh, lets not forget Wailing Murray another of your favourites .

 

 

You have made a series of disastrous player calls, only mitigated by the fact that those calls are just the fantasy of a rugby groupie. The tell? You were one of the rugby morons who rated Luke Watson. 

 

In fact I can't remember one good call you made. You even missed the one real backline superstar to emerge in the last 4 years ...Willie. You were very late to that party.

 

I'm sorry to say but HM's rugby brain is vastly superior to yours.

CE
CeradynePro9,374 posts
13 Jun 2014, 16:04
#20
13 Jun 2014, 16:04#20
 Saffex

Status: Hall Of Fame 
Posts: 8082RE: Clueless Meyer - I've worked it out
June 13, 2014, 13:30:38No Vlag just pointing out that you are lying 
No shit, Sherlock? Are you saying that you had no issue at all with the England side that was selected for the first test? From what I can remember you kakked yourself about the selection. 
BE
Beeno1Captain40,032 posts
13 Jun 2014, 16:06
#21
13 Jun 2014, 16:06#21
What a pity, Burden, Deon Fourie, Spies, Koster, Daniel (What nutter made hima loosie!!) and possibly a few others didnt play in the backline. Schalk Brits as a centre? We have an abundance of forwards in South Africa and globally. Classy backs are not as numerous.Burden showed a very nice turn of pace in the match agai nst the Boks


SA
Saffolk Captain30,741 posts
13 Jun 2014, 16:26
#22
13 Jun 2014, 16:26#22

Don't lie Moz, I did not saying anything about Burden being a future Bok centre, for he never played centre beyond U20 level.

 

I said JJ was the best 13 prospect since Gerber, I stand by that.....that fact that Meyer is ignoring him along with a host of other young players just shows up Meyer for the clown he is.

 

Geez Moz, age is getting the better of you for repetition seems to be the order of the day for you.......I'll say it for the 100th time, Olivier was my 3rd choice 12, after Jean and Frans......Murray was my second choice 13 after Fourie.....he was better than your joke of a choice in turnstile Adi Jacobs......maybe you should print this 100th take on Olivier and Murray as a reminder so that I do not have to repeat it for the 101st time in a week or two?????

 

Watson was a quality rugby player with issues beyond rugby - he was a class act

 

So try again Moz, a little harder this time.......given your take on Olivier, Meyer's selection of Olivier really does serve to endorse your take on his rugby brain.......what a laugh

 

CL
CleanCutPro9,905 posts
13 Jun 2014, 16:45
#23
13 Jun 2014, 16:45#23
 
Oh dear ... I too thought highly of Luke Watson.

He should have made the Bok run on side long before White's hand was forced.



MO
MozartCaptain49,914 posts
13 Jun 2014, 16:53
#24
13 Jun 2014, 16:53#24
You absolutely did Dave and you went ballistic when he was switched to hooker....a move which saved his playing career...another stupid howl at the coaches.
Watson was a provincial player who wasn't physical enough for test rugby. You and the old bald coot obviously missed the lessons the Bulls gave him every time they met him.
These foolish, repetitious attacks  are getting old.
CE
CeradynePro9,374 posts
13 Jun 2014, 16:59
#25
13 Jun 2014, 16:59#25
 Ou Clearasil thought highly of the disruptive midget...... Says it all.
BE
Beeno1Captain40,032 posts
13 Jun 2014, 17:08
#26
13 Jun 2014, 17:08#26
 Watson in his prime was a useful provincial player and never more than that. To think he has 10 or so Bok caps and Deon Fourie none is so weird. 
CC please dont embarrass yourself by suggesting Watson was a good enough for the Boks!!! 
We are particlualry blessed with loose forwards in this country and wee Watson just couldnt compete. Just wasn't naturally endowed enough. To small, not particlularly fast (like Deon Fourie) and no fetcher either. If he had been quicker you might have made a backline player out of him as he did have some skills.


MO
MozartCaptain49,914 posts
13 Jun 2014, 17:18
#27
13 Jun 2014, 17:18#27
He survived for years at the Stormers because Schalk did all the work....and he inserted himself at scrumhalf. A pathetic interlude in Stormers rugby. But you are wrong on one score Hasbeen, CleanGene can't embarrass himself....the foul mouthed, juvenile twerp is already seen as a joke by the Board. Just as he was on past boards when he was in his Nazi phase.
SA
Saffolk Captain30,741 posts
13 Jun 2014, 17:53
#28
13 Jun 2014, 17:53#28

No Moz you are speaking shit, Burden had only played U20 rugby as a centre......I raved about his abilities but did not call for him to play as a Bok - that is utter rubbish.

 

 

As for Watson, he had test flank written all over him.....great skills, perfect link player. Had he not had other agendas, he would have had a long test playing career.

 

 

 

— END OF THREAD —

More from Rugby

More news