FIXTURESNo upcoming fixtures — check back soon.
FORUM / RUGBY /  Crusaders expect Sharks to play to their strengths; by RICHARD KNOWLER

Crusaders expect Sharks to play to their strengths; by RICHARD KNOWLER

Started by Just_win12 REPLIES152 VIEWS· 21 Jul 2014, 23:17
SHAREXFACEBOOKWHATSAPPTELEGRAMREDDITLINKEDIN
JW
Just_winCaptain18,570 posts
21 Jul 2014, 23:17
#1
21 Jul 2014, 23:17#1

Tabai Matson would hoot with laughter if a Sharks' insider offered to sell Jake White's game plans this week.

Crusaders defence coach Matson expects nothing tricky from Sharks coach White in Saturday night's Super Rugby semifinal and anyone trying to convince him otherwise risks being dispatched with a sharp tap to the temple.

"His [White] team plays to their strengths and they are very clinical with what they do," Matson says. "They have a few things on the menu and they cook it very well.

"We will expect the same as teams he has prepared before. It will be very, very similar."

White, who guided the Springboks to World Cup glory in 2007 and last year took the Brumbies to the final against the Chiefs, likes to play the percentages; that's a low-risk game based around possession, kicking, position and pressure.

Apart from the surprise loss to the Cheetahs in Bloemfontein earlier this month, when they launched more from the deep, the Sharks usually prefer to use their brutal forward pack and long kicking game to apply a tourniquet to their opponents before easing them to their knees.

The Highlanders almost succeeded in bowling the Sharks last weekend, speeding up the game with quick penalty taps and throw-ins and stretching their defence by keeping the ball alive.

Ultimately, the Sharks' mighty scrum and their lineout drives proved insurmountable and no-one in the Crusaders camp expects anything different in the semifinal.

White's conservative plays don't come without their risks, something noted by former Sharks director of rugby Brendan Venter in a recent column.

"It should be stressed that White's aforementioned model for success is not a foolproof plan and, in terms of strategy, is very limited," Venter, an ex-Springbok midfielder and qualified doctor, wrote.

"Its success or failure is largely dependent upon the level of intensity the players are able to deliver on a particular match day."

It wasn't only the 30-25 scoreline that angered the Crusaders when they lost to the 14-man Sharks team in Christchurch on May 17.

Their defence statistics were poor, something Matson attributed to a variety of issues - including kicking too much and giving the opposition counter-attacking opportunities.

"We had an 82 per cent tackle accuracy which was way low. We are always looking at 90 per cent and to be 82 - you just can't play at that level.

"We coughed up three tries which is a terrible day in our defensive office for us. There's a lot for us to tidy up from that night."

First five-eighth Frans Steyn orchestrated the Sharks' first try to Sibusiso Sithole, gassing through a gaping hole caused by Ryan Crotty rushing up too quickly. Rather than being a fault with the defensive system, Matson said that was an individual error.

"It was more the guy who stepped out of the system that got a massive slap on the hand. Just a schoolboy error, just rushed out of the line and a world-class player will take that, thank you."

The Crusaders' strong set pieces and mauling game that proved so effective in their most recent game - the 34-8 win over the Highlanders on July 12 - in conjunction with moving the ball wide to No 8 Kieran Read and wing Nemani Nadolo, could dismantle the visitors.

"If you make a team play their B-game it's going to make your day a lot easier," Matson said. "Doing that is a lot more difficult than what you put on paper in a plan."

FO
ForeverArizonaClub Pro580 posts
22 Jul 2014, 00:00
#2
22 Jul 2014, 00:00#2

 This game is going to be a cracker!!!!The Crusaders will be looking for revenge for the previous encounter and the Sharks will only be able to hold on to the memory of a match...that seems so long ago now after that loss to the Cheetahs.

 

Key men for the Sharks will be BdP,P Lambie(if he starts), C McCloud and if anything Frans needs to have a big game.All said...the guys with the reputations need to trun up or we are going home empty handed.

 

I cant say much about the Crusaders.I don't know who they will field.Obvious players to watch would be Dagg,Carter,Read and Crotty.Their Forwards obviously would want to prove a point after the dismal showing a month or so ago.

 

I think the Sharks biggest weakness is at 15.SP Marais is not a class act.I wonder how he got to that Jersey.He must know some people...For the Saders their biggest weakness is the number 9 shirt.Their is no creativity in that role.Khan Fotuali'i(if I got that name right) was a big loss for them in my book.

 

Anyway its going to be a cracker!!!!!!!My score prediction is 17 -12 for the Sharks.This wont be a high scoring game.

3K
3ku1Pro2,580 posts
22 Jul 2014, 07:35
#3
22 Jul 2014, 07:35#3
 Crusaders 32-17
FO
ForeverArizonaClub Pro580 posts
22 Jul 2014, 08:48
#4
22 Jul 2014, 08:48#4
 3ku1.....what are you smoking brother,give me some.
3K
3ku1Pro2,580 posts
22 Jul 2014, 09:05
#5
22 Jul 2014, 09:05#5
 Haha Okay Sharks 32-17 better? But seriously this is what Saders do, their 14th consecutive semi final appearance. Sharks haven't been too good last few weeks, their win againgst Saders was in freakish circumstances, won't happen again. The Saders only lost over the past month has been to the Canes, so I think Saders at home well be too strong.
FO
ForeverArizonaClub Pro580 posts
22 Jul 2014, 09:48
#6
22 Jul 2014, 09:48#6
 You might be right....but still...80min of rugby has to be played.
CL
clevermikeCoach57,555 posts
22 Jul 2014, 10:12
#7
22 Jul 2014, 10:12#7
 I would not make a prediction in this game - my guess is that it would be a difficult one either way.   
One can only hope that Lewies is available and that Lambie is selected at flyhalf.   The locks should be Oosthuizen and Lewies.   
As a Shark supporter - one must hope that -
*   Steyn at 12 does not bugger up as much as normal when he played in that position and produce something positive for a change;
*   that whoever is at 7 does not bugger up and cause cards again - in the previous game Deysel was red-carded and Alberts got a yellow card and whomsoever it is does do some positive work for a change;
*   that McCleofd is not selected - he caused more game losses for the Sharks than any other scrummie managed to do - can be good in one case and bad in the enxt three cases.  
Marais is not the idea full back - but he is adequate.   The player who will suffer as a result will be Jordaan - he will have to cover for the misadventures of Steyn at center - especially in defense - and will have to try and make something out of a hopeless player on his inside.  Double work for him.
If the defensive sieve is not too bad and the loafer does a bit more work - the score line would look a lot better than expected - but that is a big IF.   
As I said  would hessitate to make a prediction but my guess is that the  Crusaders would win by about 12 points - because they have the better all-round team.   They may be finding t very difficult up front - but they have a functional backline - which the Sharks does not have.         
CE
CeradynePro9,374 posts
22 Jul 2014, 11:42
#8
22 Jul 2014, 11:42#8
 Two paragraphs from the OP:

"First five-eighth Frans Steyn orchestrated the Sharks' first try to Sibusiso Sithole, gassing through a gaping hole caused by Ryan Crotty rushing up too quickly. Rather than being a fault with the defensive system, Matson said that was an individual error."


"It was more the guy who stepped out of the system that got a massive slap on the hand. Just a schoolboy error, just rushed out of the line and a world-class player will take that, thank you."
CL
clevermikeCoach57,555 posts
22 Jul 2014, 12:10
#9
22 Jul 2014, 12:10#9
Ceradyne 
One effort in a total of 17 games played.  Problem is that immediately after that try was scored by Sithole- Steyn went sour (possibly caused by his dodgy knee).  He was primarily responsible for the try scored by Slade 6 minutes later as a result of a non-effort attempt at defense.
He did zilch for the rest of that match and even missed to kicks at goal - after which he was replaced.   Ever heard of one swallow not making the summer?   That was the case here and if it was not for the efforts of Reinaxh and Jordaan - that game would have been lost.
Look again at Steyn's stats  in that game:-
Steyn0/1107/6/85613146/30/000/0
45 of those meters gained was in the case of the Sithole try.  The other efforts on his part produced nothing.  Look also at his ball possession losses - 4 in one game and his tackle stats - 33.3% missed tackle ratio.   He went sour - he went sour big style. 
World class player??????? What a joke   
Nice try - so come up with something worthwhile for a change.       
CE
CeradynePro9,374 posts
22 Jul 2014, 12:22
#10
22 Jul 2014, 12:22#10
 Are you sure you want to start on your favourite missed tackle ratio again?

"Ever heard of one swallow not making the summer?"

Should I get you the picture of the pot and the kettle again?
BR
BrycyPro4,671 posts
22 Jul 2014, 12:41
#11
22 Jul 2014, 12:41#11

 ...Sharkies have been written off by the bookies so that could work in their favour as motivation....working against them will be the addition of players like Kieren Read, Israel Dagg, Dan Carter, and Nadolo who weren't playing in the last game ...


...the way the Highlanders cut the Sharkies backline to pieces must be a major concern as Dagg , Carter, Nadolo and co all have the potential to do the same thing...could be a blowout...

CL
clevermikeCoach57,555 posts
22 Jul 2014, 12:49
#12
22 Jul 2014, 12:49#12
 Veradyne
Just a question you came up with Steyn's eulogy and I effectively pricked that bubble.  In the case of Steyn there are ample reason to worry about his defense. In teh Highlanders game he missed 6 tackles out of 9 attempts - that makes for a missed tackle ratio of 55.6%.
Even worse than Morne's efforts - the last one was worse than Morne's Ellis Park efforts - but then Morne gave away three tries at Ellis Park and and Steyn only two the last game.   Maybe one day you will understand why the Stade Francaise Reject and the Fat Japan-bound Dodgy Knee Steyn are both no good in any backline.    
CE
CeradynePro9,374 posts
22 Jul 2014, 20:19
#13
22 Jul 2014, 20:19#13

.


clevermike

Status: Hall Of Fame
Posts: 11856 RE: Crusaders expect Sharks to play to their strengths; by RICHARD KNOWLER
July 22, 2014, 10:49:52  Veradyne
Just a question you came up with Steyn's eulogy and I effectively pricked that bubble. 


 

No shit Sherlock? Djy moet wakker slaap ouboet.

— END OF THREAD —

More from Rugby

More news