Does anybody still doubt that the Boks are better with AE and Moodie in midfield?
Yes, Dave, I already know that you're gonna say that AE and DDA are the same player and you want Willemse at 12.
Saturday was a perfect example of how toothless the Boks are with Donkey boy at 12. For once in his life he actually got a break and offloaded and we got a try from that passage of play. But we all know how incredibly rare that is. We all saw that for the rest of the game and how we relied on snipes from the ruck and Sacha's brilliance to create scores. Same as we have to do every time Donkey-Kriel suck the life out the middle of the field.
I wont rant too much. But I am interested to know if anybody here still thinks that DDA is our best 12?
Here is the scary part...
I have a feeling that Rassie wants Hooker to be a like-for-like replacement for DDA. I think he sees in Ethan a chap that could give him what DDA does.
Do we agree that it would be a massive shame to turn our second brightest talent into a mindless zombie?
For me, Hooker has excellent software and his hardware is liquid cooled. I'm yet to see him make a bad decision. I've always said that in my view Willemse's brilliance is in large part down to his ability to understand when to attack and when to protect possession. Hooker strikes me as having that same excellent risk management ability. AE might be the strongest backline player in rugby right now and is yet to have a bad game for the Boks.
We have so many options for 12, and I'd really love for somebody to make a convincing case for why DDA should be the first choice.
As for Jessica, lol...it's basically impossible to make a case for her so I won't task anyone with that.