de Allende says it as it is

Sensible guy Allende and unfortunately not appreciated by some who should know better after all my educating on the matter!!! 

That's rich coming from Damian, he was under pressure throughout the 2015 season, having statistically the worst defensive stats in super rugby and failing throughout the remainder of the ye ar. Consider his line speed versus Nonu, so he must assuredly be speaking of himself.

Rugby has changed quite a lot though, the attack figures have increased significantly, as I've showed repeatedly over the past year - a trend the Boks haven't been following under Rassie. Structurally, the shape of the game up north has hanged radically, but they have retained the fundamentals. The SH has deteriorated more in terms of defence and set pieces, the basics. Teams are more even for this cycle, even the tier two teams are in excellent physical condition and coached to a very good standard. It's quite remarkable. However, defence is not as strong as it was four years ago. The Bok and Welsh defence of four years ago - even with the turnstiles Damian and Kriel - were superior to any team in this year's competition, especially Wales. Going further back to 2011, and the physicality and defensive solidity was even better yet. The SANZAR big three of today would struggle mightily to compete against the 2011 sides. 

Lizzie 

A lie is a lie and if repeated it still is a lie about that Nonu incident.   There was no way De Allende could have prevented Nonu from running diagionally across the field all he could do is run after him and tackle him which he did.  A physical impossibility and your repeated the stupidity raised by liar Strzok constantly.

So now the attack is ion Erasmus again and not the piss poor Meyer who managed to lose the Japan game,   Under Meyer the Springboks struggle to score tries and the 2015 series was a typical example of it - under Erasmus they manage to double the number of tries scored in the 2019 RC and even though they lost the game against the AB's they did score one against the AB's and for the rest beat the other teams they played against by huge numbers.  

Although it is outside of the WC the Springboks did play the Japanese in Japan before the series and now look at the stats comparison between the latter game and the 2015 loss against Japan in 2015.

                                    Tries scored            Tries scored by Japan/other opponents,

2015                                     4                                    3

2019                                     6                                    1

All other WC opponents 

2015                                     22                                   4

2019                                     27                                   3  

The weird part is that the above figures include the 2019 AB game - which is here comparable to what happened in the 2015 series.   The Springboks lost the AB game which was not really a disgrace in their first WC game in 2019 and in the first WC game in 2015 they were disgraced by Japan.    In 2019 game the AB's scored 2 tries to 1 - in the 2015 match the Springboks scored 4 tries, but still lost the game because the Meyer favourites gave away  3 tries and 12 penalties of which 5 were converted - bad news that as well. 

So the rugby of other countries improved - but the village idiot Lizzie - the lia r - claimed that the improvement under Erasmus  the "trend the Boks haven't been following under Rassie" 

One has to wonder when the Idiot Speaker Lizzie will wake up to reality on site,  

 He is and remain a total Idiot Speaker,   LMAO.              

Lizzie 

A lie is a lie and if repeated it still is a lie about that Nonu incident.   There was no way De Allende could have prevented Nonu from running diagionally across the field all he could do is run after him and tackle him which he did.  A physical impossibility and your repeated the stupidity raised by liar Strzok constantly.

So now the attack is ion Erasmus again and not the piss poor Meyer who managed to lose the Japan game,   Under Meyer the Springboks struggle to score tries and the 2015 series was a typical example of it - under Erasmus they manage to double the number of tries scored in the 2019 RC and even though they lost the game against the AB's they did score one against the AB's and for the rest beat the other teams they played against by huge numbers.  

Although it is outside of the WC the Springboks did play the Japanese in Japan before the series and now look at the stats comparison between the latter game and the 2015 loss against Japan in 2015.

                                    Tries scored            Tries scored by Japan/other opponents,

2015                                     4                                    3

2019                                     6                                    1

All other WC opponents 

2015                                     22                                   4

2019                                     27                                   3  

The weird part is that the above figures include the 2019 AB game - which is here comparable to what happened in the 2015 series.   The Springboks lost the AB game which was not really a disgrace in their first WC game in 2019 and in the first WC game in 2015 they were disgraced by Japan.    In 2019 game the AB's scored 2 tries to 1 - in the 2015 match the Springboks scored 4 tries, but still lost the game because the Meyer favourites gave away  3 tries and 12 penalties of which 5 were converted - bad news that as well. 

So the rugby of other countries improved - but the village idiot Lizzie - the lair - claimed that the improvement under Erasmus  the "trend the Boks haven't been following under Rassie" 

One has to wonder when the Idiot Speaker Lizzie will wake up to reality on site,  

 He is and remain a total Idiot Speaker,   LMAO.              

Liar Strozk

You came up with that myth yourself and then claimed that you are one of the best rugby analysts in the world since nobody else came forward with that BS,   The BS is that if De Allende was nearer to Nonu when he  started the run across the field taking into account the angles involved her may not tackle him in the end - the tackle you originally claimed was never made. 

The Goodhue try was also a lie - to be expected from you.  There is NO WAY cDe Allende could remedy the BS caused by Vermeulen - he would have had to have wings to attain what you claimed he should.

You keep repeating lies - have you  no shame?     Stop being an Idiot Speaker it will imrove you image on site,  LMAO  

Strzok

Listen doos - De Allende  was meters away from him when Goodgue without the ball ran past him at full pace.  He would have to turn towards the AB tryline and start a run - impossible to catch up physically,   It is really amazing that you are always the only one that comes up with BS like this when it comes to certain players.

And aside from that Steyn made 4 tackles and missed 3 in his last test against Canada amd you tried to produce a BS excuse for that.   That makes you the total Liar in site,   Rugby ig norance runs strongly in you.               

And also many poor parts of DDA's play that don't show up in stats. 

Would be nice to see if any of the other Boks are as far below par in terms of scores.

Listen doos - De Allende  was meters away from him when Goodgue without the ball ran past him at full pace.  He would have to turn towards the AB tryline and start a run - impossible to catch up physically,   It is really amazing that you are always the only one that comes up with BS like this when it comes to certain players.

Since you insist on repeating this little lie of yours, I will bust it for you again.

Lie #1:

He would have to turn towards the AB tryline and start a run

No, he was already turned as both he and Goodhue started chasing play. Exhibit A: On the top frame you can see both DA (circled in green) and Goodhue (red) facing the same way.

In frame 2 below you can see them both sprinting with DA 2m ahead, which busts lie #2 (impossible to catch up physically,). He didn't have to catch up, he was ahead.

Exhibit B, below: 6m on DA is still ahead by the same margin. The players are matching each other for pace at this stage.

As they reach the halfway line Goodhue makes his move and turns on the gas, starting to draw level . DA keeps chugging along.

Below: Within the 10m between halfway and the 10m line Goodhue makes almost 3m on DA to end up well ahead. There can't be such a great difference in pace between two centers going full tilt - that would mean Goodhue beats DA by 30m in a 100m race. One is slacking along. Guess who.

All DA had to do was chase the play hard and stay between Barrett and Goodhue to stop the pass. Mapimpi finally wakes up to the situation in the last frame and gets some fire up his ass, but far too late.

Look at his gap now, below. You want to tell me #12 green, who started out in front, has been pushing himself? Give me a break. He's given up 20m back already. Goodhue completely owned DA in this move.

Strzok

The first 28 tests De Allende played in was when two of the worst coaches in rugby history (Meyer and Coetzee) was coaching the Springboks.  Under them the Springbok team had the worst try scoring records imaginable.   The way the games were played and the total ignorance about the role of backline play in attacking is the reason why none of the backline players has a chance to score tries.  

For you to blame De Allende for the abortion caused by the two coaches I mentioned is rich.   What is also rich is that you used to advocate they 90% of the functions of flyhalfs are to kick balls effectively nullifying the scoring of tries by backline players,  If you ever did I must have missed the posting.

Now Strzok what about the atrocious defense by Fat Fransie Steyn?  Did you ever congratulated hte team on the scoring of tries.   If you ever did I must have missed the posting.      

Dofdoos - Fact is should De Allende have tackled Goodhue without the ball?   That was the only tine he was within three meters from Goodhue.   The previous set of photos indicated a different scenario and now you have another set possibly a bit later indicating a later position.   

The reasoning of Strzok and you was NEVER mentioned by anybody else in the wide world.   That means it was BS discovered by you two and is basically distortion of the situation,  It is always about two players - De Allende and Du Toit,   If any other player buggers up badly like Vermeulen did in the case of the Goodhue try, the Perth test in 2014 or the missed tackle of Mostert on Sanchez always blame either of the two players,  

That is sick and you should be ashamed of yourself in distortions you two are capable of,   Lies and deceit is not qualities of ordinary honest people - and the honest part where you two fall short.     

Strzok, Liza Page and Comey 

The two most rugby illiterate and prejudiced BSters on site.   They are a pair with Liza Page the third of the three Liarkreteers on site.   Meyer was wonderful in 2015 when loosing all RC matches and Erasmus was bad despite the fact that the Springboks won the trophy in 2019 with two large wins and a draw.   The point difference in 2015 was minus 23 in 2015 and plus 51 in 2019 - that obviously does not count at all.   All the three dolts did was not a word of congratulation to the Springboks winning the trophy at all - but an all-out attack on their normal targets -  Du Toit and De Allende.

I have never seen such BS in my life before.   If they cannot normally find incidents they invent them by writing totally unrealistic BS on site.  Whenever they suddenly open up issues that nobody else discovered, they thrive on BS in describing non-existent faults.   So you get absurd situations like -

*   Mostert missed a tackle - but blame Du Toit for the miss;

*    Vermeulen spilled the ball and the All Blacks get easy possession and scored a try - but lets not blame Vermeulen for it - blame De Allende for not making a totally irrational tackle;

*    Steyn missed tackle after tackle against Canada - but he makes real tackles De Allende make fake ones.

*    Meyer picked a dud squad containing 8 non-playable players in the 2015 WC squad - Erasmus picked according to them a worse squad because he included - guess who - Du Toit, De Jager, Kriel, Reinach and De Allende in the squad.

One can go on and on about their crazy descriptions and write a longer list stretching over 5 or more years and the same lies are repeated all the time.  That is why I wish them regularly a Happy Liars and Distortion Day - they thoroughly deserve it,  LMAO.

                           .  

Ag himmell - the Liar does not even know I never was a "provincial worker" as he claimed,    As per normal he lies even about that one.   The man is an idiot supreme.  

Ag himmell - the Liar does not even know I never was a "provincial worker" as he claimed,    As per normal he lies even about that one.   The man is an idiot supreme.