de Allende the best 12 in the game

What has he done? Until you can reference one thing, you have no reason to post about him. As shown in the proper Damian thread: Worst Bok 12 in my lifetime. Ende.

Enough to make Pollard state that he is brilliant and the best inside center  he ever played with. .   

Lot’s of claims of brilliance….nothing other than tractoring to report,

The botched forward pass to Am, the lost try setting Am free. Big moments. How unfortunate the evil biased ref nailed us for that forward pass. Hurts to be a victimised Saffer. 

I win the video battle. I have his entire test season on YouTube and scores of other key games. You lose. Next time, don't bring a potato peeler to a nuke fight. 

You win nothing Gonzo ...videos and stats don't show the whole game. Everything out of context and negative and one eyed vision to suit your personal vendettas.

You cannot answer honest questions...as I said, a ducker and diver that misrepresents the truth. Every player, no matter, has his up and down moments, exceptional players included. There are no exceptions...never seen quite a perfect player...not even Hugo Porta, Dan Carter, Jonah Lomu, ZinZan Brooke, Danie Gerber, Jooste vd Westhuizen...err Gareth Edwards i s the closest but even he had his off-days.

Everything without context? You're embarrassing yourself Chabs. I provided context. I challenge you to show me what this missing context is. If I show a ruck to a ruck, all buildup and conclusion. That's context. I've done this with everything. You don't like what you hear, and resist the truth because you are dishonest. Just like Unteromlett, Lügnerin and the others who are effortlessly exposed for their dishonesty. You make bold claims, fanciful little ideas, from thin air and then expect me to take you seriously. 

Kinderrgarten imbecile

The way you describe what happened in games show total deficient knowledge of the game and false - same as Mozart.    You have a long history fo deception and it started years ago.    You accused Erasmus of destroying the Stormers - but did not even know when and for how long he coached the Stormers.   

Another example is that penalty line kick by Morne  Steyn that directly led to the loss of the Springboks in the Perth Test - with Habana off with a yellow card and ready to get back onto the field with the next break in play.    Steyn's kick was no problem - Lambie missed  tackle when the aussies counter-attacked is what lost the game.    Then the idiocy about him making a ten meter gain - even of Steyn made a 10 meter gain it would not hand possesion voer to them/  

Now another example of you and Mozart  totally buggering up    It relates to the try scored by de Jager in the RC test in 2019.    Firstly how did the try happen?   After comment of what happened .   I gave a breakdown - which was accurate and precise after yu two mentiond nothing about the try.     The ball  went down the backline and got to Le Roux who ran about two steps before passing it to Du Toit  who broke the line and made about 8 steps before kicking  the Ball.   Jantjies gathered the ball and was tackled virtually on the tryline    Du Toit  was there to protect the ball from being turned over.    So the ball came back and in the maul D Jager forced his way through the defenders and scored the try.    Now how did the two of you treat that,    Mozart's comments were the kick was meaning less because the ball could have bounced the wrong way.    Your comments was that "people" think it was not a try.

Then there was the try scored by De-Allende  in the WC semi -  both you and Mozart ignored it and  when I challenged Mozart on it  - he claimed that the Defense fouled up and despite the fact that three players tried to tackle him he scored because of his physical strength. 

Same about the De Jager line-out steal - a string of uter garbage about how the Lions fouled up - so no credit to De Jager for the steal.    

I can write a long string of examples  about incidents.    With that being the attitude of the two of you there is no way that you would ever see any favorable  display by De Allende, Dyu Toit or De Jager.   

By the way dimness there is an advanced computer program dealing with the contributions by every player in any surveyed match.   It covers every move of the player and avery contribution made and also deficiencies,   It costa fortune  and si obviously available top coaches and other experts - not the general public.   Meyer and Coetzee did not use it when it came to team selection and coaching basically because they diod not udnerstand the value of the program.    All the  Preset coaching staff studied that program and then ahve an accurate idea  about performances and that in turn influences both selection and game plans - becaus their studies also look at opposition players.   

So here is the difference - the caches and experts have a full database that support their playr choices - you have ESPN and do not even understand that basic one.           .                        

Lets hope Lood can gain at least 1 metre in contact, make one tackle on his own and not drop the ball. Go on Lood, we're counting on you! 

What's Steph's metres per carry? He ranks as the 17th best flank in SH rugby with abysmal metres, defenders beaten, breaks, offloads and passes. A carthorse and the most porous defender in the team. You sure know how to pick your battles. "Hasbeen" 2015 Schalk' s production absolutely obliterates Steph in every category. One of them was praised by you.

In fact, the unintelligent plastics spun the narrative that Schalk was literally playing flyhalf. Why? Because these self-professed experts didn't know what a pod was and the structures of the modern game. Absolutely hilarious. Josè and Crutch do EXACTLY the same thing, but worse, and it's cutting edge modern rugby. Hilarious. You plastics are always behind the curve, can never back up your squawking and wave a glass jaw around like Tyson waves his clenched fists. 

Just because you feel like digging up a series of old disputes all of which you lost, doesn’t mean anybody has to respond to your hilarious misrepresentations Peeper. Why don’t you switch on  your wanking machine and have at it.

I dug up nothing - idiocy leads you to do so.    No Mozart - your description in what happened in matches had been proved to be prejudiced garbage discovered by you over and over again

If only he could pass a ball with anything resembling timing or skill. 

The guy is terrible at knowing where his support is. 

I still think Kwagga would be better than DDA in that position. And it' s a bloody crime that RJVR isn't there. 

Kwagga and Kolisi would both be significant upgrades at 12. But, we don't need to go that far, as Esterhuizen, who has been treated badly by José and Crutch, is right there. 

If you think all Allende does is tractor your bias has blinded you.

Yes Allende is one of the best inside centers.

Pollard would know.

RJVR  looked good before he went overseas. Like to see him in action again. 

Kwagga would I am sufe made a very good center as I have said for years. But would have to prove it. 

Meanwhile we are very well served by Allende. 

Moz and the Org need to wise up. They are all at sea again. 

He doesn't just tractor, he also holds onto ball until the runner is in front of him, flicks the ball behind the heads of runners, loses the ball in contact, gets dumped on his backside, clasps at ankles, lays hands on opponents like a preacher. Very versatile. As we saw against NZ in the 2015 WC, and the home England series in 2018, he is quite the gentleman, escorting opponents to the try line.

In all seriousness he used to be good at the breakdown. I haven't seen that in a very long time. In early 2019 a strange malady took hold of him, constant chips down the touchline. Thankfully that is gone. We did see a return of his Gangnam Style hop before contact in the second Lions test.

A strange fellow to be sure. Herr Sitzsack, away with the fairies. But what kind of fairies? Of the LGBTQLMNOP variety? Stay tuned folks. Never a dull moment on Herr Sitzsack and Chums. 

Blaas my siel - the idiot continues with his tirade comprising lies and deceit.   

Well. Dominated again. His one big run was targeting the weak outside shoulder to tractor but the tractor ran out of steam, he was held up, and turned over. Blown away on defence and offered nothing but one rudimentary pass. One very important breakdown steak but was bullied thereafter. 4/10 at best. 

Did not happen as per normal.    The real players missed on the day were De Klerk and Pieter-Steph du Toit.  Mostert was a passenger at 7 nd a bad one at that.       

Reinach was good enough. Steph would have been found wanting on defence. Can't make such quick reads.