It's kinda funny to observe the different reactions from other fans regarding the outcomes of the games. Per usual ever since SA were "robbed" at the 2011 wc, by the evil Bryce Lawerence. Any time theirs any form of controversy involving NZ teams it does not matter if its small, big, justified or not. Their are a select few who love to sensationalize, and act like its some injustice, or epidemic, and a continuation. They never acknowledge it's not one sided, its a two way street. NZ just get as many bad calls, but its not as convenient as to focus on that it is, of course its not it downplays your agenda, biast againgst all nz teams. I find it hard to believe any SA supporter cares England were "robbed" or they "lost", far as im concerned it does not matter if you win by 1 point or 100, winnings winning.
Bad calls happen all the time, yellow cards are given out all the time, that's a given its up to the team to be prepared for that, NZ were just more prepared and more experienced in the end that's all. NZ wan because Conrad Smith scored a try simple as that. People forget NZ had one week to form a test side, agangst a England side who were up for it, been playing together for months, even if its their B side. Aussie were fortunate to play a French side who just didn't turn up, and SA are apparently world beaters now because they wan one game againgst an invitational team. Funny isin't it NZ have now wan 15 matches in a row, but apparently they are on the decline, yet SA win one game against an unimportant opposition suddenly they are the best side in the world . Good game SA but the test season just began, I seem to remember NZ had a similar first result againgst the French, similar to the scoreline with England, thing is this issnt super rugby, you don't see the rate of trys you do in super rugby, this is test rugby it is brutal. NZ once again showed why they are the best team on the planet, no one from 1-15 plays Total Rugby, and no one is as clinical and proficient simple as that.
