I don't believe I have a reputation on this board as a ref-basher but I didn't think the Springboks deserved to lose that game and Romain Poitre played too big a part in the result of the game for my liking.
I would have been annoyed enough if Bismarck had served 10 minutes in the bin for the second yellow which to me was possibly a bit clumsy but not malicious and a perfectly legitimate attempt at a fend, but the first yellow against Biz was just plain wrong. Please, if the likes of Moolaa want to tell me that Bismarck was offsides then at at least take the trouble to view it again and if you still think that tackle was deserving of a yellow card then just piss off and go read up on the laws of the game! If that kind of tackle is not allowed in rugby then I'm honestly less inclined to watch the game in future because that was exactly the kind of hit I watch rugby for! Bismarck was effectively yellow carded for hitting Carter too hard and if that tackle was penalized back in the 1970s then the ref (and the bleaters like Moolaa) would have been ridiculed as pansies.
What really pisses me off was Poitre's response when Jean asked him why he had penalized the tackle and Poitre replied that it was high, late and he didn't use his arms. That was zero out of three for Poitre as far as I'm concerned. There was only one incident in the game that was even remotely worthy of a red card and that was Ma'a Nonu's cynical, late and armless hit on Jean de Villiers. Very disappointing result to a game that I was very excited for.
Hard luck Bokke! Let's set the record straight at Ellis Park!


