Don't you guys think Organpuffer should apply for a position as advisor for Rassie and Co.

Well, what do you think the result would be ... Saffex, Mike, Beeno and Mozart ?Hahahaha. 

Organpuffer...lol

I think it would be a disaster. and a waste of money by SARU.   With all due respect any advice by SARU.    His advice would be worthless since he does have a more serious problem  than other site members would have.   We are all deficient when it comes to knowledge of  professional rugby - but AO is not only ignorant he is stubborn as well.       

Auge has a fine analytical/technical mind, but he's got a few HUGE blind spots that you need to recognize to navigate his posts. Fine poster and his "tells" make him fun to read...he'll struggle playing poker though.

Sorry guys, I'm over qualified. 

I have indeed. 12, 13, 10 and 8. In that order. 

S o you were putrid in all foiur positions - nothing new. 

Oom a piece of advice …..don’t try to be funny, you’re much funnier when you aren’t trying.

Yep, all "foiur" of them. 

Ol Moz and Dim Sun remind me of T weedle Dee and Tweedle Dum characters in Lewis Carroll's , Alice in Wonderland...and the Madhatters Tea Party is an event that often happens here with various characters that could well fit the part, with the only sane one being Alice (Becs). LOL.

"Sorry guys, I'm over qualified."

Haha...zing!!!

Plum

That is typical - remember how the two of Mozart and the Kindergarten Imbecile bragged that they are better analysts of matches than any rugby experts are.   They downplay anything good players like Du Toit and De Allende did and find things they call as poor play and do not mind to distort the circumstances even what they came up with is physically impossible.   That  is why if they claim something happened  a person should analyze what REALLY happened to arrive at a true explanation.     In all cases what they claimed happened is really false and total nonsense.  

Anyway the best thing to do is to say you are welcome to their own BS and forget about what they come up with.    They players they punt would lose more matches than they will win.

Everything I have stated is verifiable by film review. You are among those plastics who fall apart when the film comes out. I haven't seen a Steph, Damian, Lambie, Goosen, Watson, Kolisi fan who ever has their facts straight. It's actually very easy to dismantle you. Even worse still, you never learn from past experience. I have distorted nothing. As per never praising these two? I've given Steph credit for is two rare performances, the home Wallaby test of 2018 and the away England test. Always credit where it was due. The door is still open for you to refute what I'm saying by posting something resembling a rebuttal. You know I am wrong, but cannot tell when and where? That's very odd. I have scores of detailed references and game breakdowns for every Josè test. If you want to take me down you're going to have to get off your backside and try harder. The typical plastic approach is a proven failure. 

Waste of time! History, what counts far more is now. Trust what I see before my eyes. It seems your eyes see differently to every one else b esides Tweedle Dee, haha.

Now soothsayer, tell us what the score will be on Saturday...

I'll make it easy, who will win and by how much.

Predicting a score is very different from understanding how the teams play and ways of dealing with those approaches. The floor is yours, any test, any player and we shall evaluate it right here. So far, you don't have any references to back up what you trust with your own eyes. Why did you miss the Steph gaffs against Georgia? The old eye a little too faded to see? Why didn't you see the gaffs of the other myths? You don't have a track record of bringing anything to the table. Criticise me all you want, in the end, I back what I say up! You have a long road ahead of you. I know which road you'll take. The easy path down Snowflake Lane. 

Your type of evaluation is what can be called super shit and totally worthless.    Du Toit was top class in the game between  the Lions  and the A-team.  The moment Du Toit and de Allende was replaced the team performances deteriorated.    And  so was the  replacement of De Allende  against the Bulls.       

Neither are world class. The picture you paint is actually one of a poor quality test of dysfunctionality. We will never require the presence of these two players. Ende.

PS: You have an unbroken record of being wrong and lying. 

I do not distort performances like you do sheister.   

What exactly have you constructly brought to the table...really, humour occassionally yes I give you that, sometimes but for years you have been lurking in the background.

CC said it well :

"Lurking in the background, huh?

A reader ... not a contributor?

Waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaahahahahaaaaaa!!!

IF you say so."

Having said that I agree that we are all entitled to our own perceptions and it's constructive to be factual however.

But it also requires some sense of respect for players that have proved their team worth...in other words the full picture in the context of a whole in a 15 man team. Individual nit picking for faults of great players (rated by the players themselves is senseless in comparison to our so called expertise. If you think you're an expert you are totally deluded. 

Pakie, who I respect as one of the best analyst, (along with Biltong Bek who departed long ago) said this:

"sense of respect for players that have proved their team worth"

This is where you keep failing. They haven't. Esterhuizen has, unrewarded. RG has, unrewarded. Damian no. Steph no. A player with the most porous defence stats, which doesn't even account for the enormous bulk of defensive engagements cleanly broken, is not proving his worth. This is not an opinion, this is a fact. You fall for the feel good Saffer tripe based on feelings. South Africans don't do analytics well, if at all. Everything through the prism of feels. Noone has been able to refute what I have put forward. Noone can. This frustrates the feely types. Makes them uncomfortable. I've done more game breakdowns than anyone here and assessed these players in more varied ways too. As I said to Lügnerin, if you want to take me down, you'll have to do your homework. Pakie didn't rate Steph as all that either, nor did he rate Damian. Got yourself in a pickle there matey. To diminish what I have brought to the table, which is more rugby content than all of the plastics combined, is arrogant as it is absurd. I have challenged all if you to disprove it, and none of you have done so. All I have heard is that these players are great because of stuff, and "everyone" (who exactly?) thinks so, these flubs are key contributors for some unspecified reason. Put it this way, who in the World Cup XV finished in the top 10 of any performance category? Where is the ouput? Steph was ranked 17th for performance that year, of all flanks. Strip away the opinion, the feelings, and you are left with what is ultimately a lie. That you are given the platform to assess any test footage, and cannot fathom so much as one reference is hilarious. Yet, I thoroughly sift through a player's entire season and it's "what have you done exactly"? 

You sifting anything carefully is a joke.   You missed out totlaly what happened and adjsuted the truth to support your ideas.   i went through one of yoiur recent descriptions and it was a farce full of misrepresentations - so what are they worth/  Zilch - because you try to convince people of something which never happened.     

You obviously are welcome to try and express your opinion on site as are we to expose your stories  based on fabrications and prejudice.   Real life demands that in rugby if a player does well prays him for what he did - if he fails to perform criticize him.   In your case it is the exact opposite.            

Anyway - I read your contributions and they are indeed in many cases jokes - so I will treat your latest one in the same vein.

Yes Organhuffer should be immediately appointed! Brilliant idea.

Then when ou Organhuffer advises something do the opposite. Results will be fabulous! 

 Bwahahahahahahahahahaha

Mike,

He told you he's overqualified.

You'll have to sweeten the pot.