Eddie Jones calls for Australian rugby to axe two Super Rugby teams

As SANZAAR continues to delay a decision on the future of Super Rugby, step up Eddie Jones. England's coach has delivered a typically blunt assessment of Australian rugby, suggesting two teams should be cut.

After a shambolic season in which the Wallabies won six of 15 games, including three losses to the All Blacks, and no Australian team featured in the Super Rugby semi finals, Jones believes the answer is to cull the Western Force and Melbourne Rebels in order to strengthen the Waratahs, Reds and Brumbies.

While less teams mean less players exposed to top flight rugby, those that remain would be forced to scrap it out for starting roles.

With all parties unable to agree on Super Rugby's long-term future, SANZAAR have put off a decision on the structure beyond next year until March. Despite much resistance, the 18-team status quo is likely to be retained.

"The reason Australia wanted to have more than the three Super Ruby teams was to create extra depth so the immediate question that needs to be answered is have those two extra teams strengthened the Wallabies? If they have, then keep them. If they haven't, then they've got to look at whether they should persevere with them or not," Jones said.

In the modern area decisions are made with broadcast deals and financial concerns often placed above on-field results. But with the likes of Adam Ashley-Cooper, Matt Giteau and Will Genia among Wallabies now plying their trade overseas, Jones remains adamant Australia must adopt a pragmatic approach.

"As a coach I don't get paid to work out the contracts but that's very much part of the equation.

"I've always said Australia is best to have the three teams and the best players playing with each other. That creates hot competition to get into Super Rugby and adds extra to everything that happens in Australian rugby. The Force and the Rebels have done some good things but I don't think it's added considerably to Australian rugby at the moment. They've got to really question whether they continue with them."

Jones is committed to England through to 2019 but post World Cup the 56-year-old reiterated his intention to move elsewhere.

"I'll come to New Zealand mate; I'm waiting for the offer," he laughed.

"I reckon I've probably got one more job left in me. All things being equal and people wanting to give me an opportunity I'd like to coach again after the World Cup. You either go to an established country that needs some help or a tier two country like I did with Japan and try to do something a bit different. Both of those are absolutely rewarding. I'll just wait and see what happens."

Jones was a key consultant ahead of the inaugural Brisbane 10s next year, and is confident the tournament will prove a long-term success.

"I really think the 10s is a great concept because it allows a different sort of rugby. It's basically entertainment rugby and it involves the best players in XVs, where sevens has become a completely different game with different players. That was evident at the Olympics. The 10s retains enough shape of XVs to allow those guys to flourish.  

"It's a great way to start a season and gets everyone excited about rugby. You'll see plenty of good attack and desperation on defence."

Stuff.co.nz

 Things are unfolding, things are unfolding.

Need to scale down the teams. The Kings should certainly be dumped- and "maybe" the Cheetas.
Although each country having 4 teams should be fine. New zealand are the only country with enough depth to have 5 teams.
when SA field 5 teams- some of the backline players are pub team standard.

 Four teams per country and every team plays every one home and away.  All this expansion has brought is money for the advertisers and sponsors.  We the fans, supporters want quality rugby, played by professional players, with fair and consistent adjudication by professional referees.  Rugby laws need to be applied in a more consistent manner with less left to referee discretion.  We have seen some very poor "discretion" calls this past season.
All the players can still be used - even if their franchise is not included in the four teams.  Some form of pool or dividing of players should be embarked upon.   - A player may only play four consecutive  Super Rugby games and must then be "rested" for a minimum of two games - immaterial of time spent on the field in the previous four games.  This will allow other fringe players to be developed and will level the participation time for players.  The national coaches will then have "better" (fitter and less injuries) players for the end-of-year tours.

Rugby back to the top