Editor please ban CleverMike.

 Mind you...

 Ariozona
Thanks for the suggestion  - I like it when you go for me and not for some of the others as well.  If you carefully read what Ceradubnce writes - you will wind out why I lose my cool with that one.   He is the only member that does it to me - but then what can one expect from a  dunce.
You do not need to read anything I post -  so why bother at all about posts being monotonous?   I read your posts and often enough agrees with you - so why bother about mine?      

 Sort it out yourselves guys, you're more than capable to do it.


Shalom

FA grow up Mike is a great poster. 

Yup, Beeno is right on this one!!

 

Full support to CleverMike he gives as good as he takes.

 Well said the JW the fading hope I had for you has been rekindled.
FA could of course be simply stirring. With Dr Moz in full flight these days the art form is spreading.

 Foreveramber...Let me get this straight...were you banned?

 Cloudy I am like castle larger beer - never sweet!!! 

 

Devil's Advocate

Status: Squad member
Posts: 306 RE: Editor please ban CleverMike.
August 01, 2014, 12:03:40

Always bitter?

Arizona, do us a favour and fuck off back to the bush, you are a worthless poster and too thick to voice a rugby opinion - now fuck off and close the door on the way out  

Why was Nicolas Sarkozy laughing....let me guess. He just heard JJ is now the bench centre in the CC. I had a similar reaction....waaaaaaahahahahaha.

Mozart
Seriously now - I think he was laughing because he has just find another woman to lay. The French presidents are always keen to follow the example of Henry IV - the great king of France with his 49 mistresses and 256 illegitimate children.
De Gaulle was probably too old for that one - but every successor had a ball.   Chirac was even missing the night Princess Diana died - he was with his mistress and his wife knew where he was.  Remember Sarkosy is no angel either - he went through how many wives already - and Hollande through how many mistresses?  
So lets give Sarkolzy credit for that one - not bring him down to the level where JJ operates or does not operate.    

Diana,Princess of Wales. She was not a Princess by birth, only marriage so she is not afforded that title. She was a Lady by birth, Lady Spencer. 
I really wish people would get that right.....and also stop calling her that god awful People's Princess rubbish. 
Seriously.  

Wow Moffie you still struggling with the carrying an injury bit - too stupid to comprehend?

Still struggling with the bit that says injured vital Springboks aren't put on the bench for CC teams, while all the other Boks are being rested. Is that thought just too threatening to your whole concept of the rugby univer se De Flattus? 

 becs
There is a tendency for royalty to marry commoners nowadays and as far as I am aware all of the Kings of the Netherlands, Spain and Belgium married commoners and so did the crown princes of Norway and Denmark, as well as the Crown Princess of Sweden. .   
At least Diane was from the aristocracy - none of those I mentioned above were.   The Dutch Queen is from Argentina - the Crown Princess of Denmark from Australia.  The one from Norway had an illegitimate child and used drugs in her youth, the one from Spain was a divorcee.   A real mixed bag - but they seem to be respected by their people.   

They all married commoners at some point or other, Mike.....in fact, there was no Royalty at one stage, now was there  
I was an Historian before I became poorly...and Kings and Queens form an integral part of that little subject. 
 

 ForeverArizona.... I ask again, were you banned from the forum because of your use of foul language?

 I think Mike is very entertaining, extremely insightful and great to have around. Mike&Mozart need their own show. 

 Leeeeeaaaave Miiiiiiiiike alonnnnnnnnnnne !!!! Or not I dont think he gives a rats what you think .