English thugs unmasked

Some may recall the British lions using a code word for stating a fight when they were in difficulties (Was it Mcbrides rabble?) Well the tradition lives on in the UK!!!!!!!!

It seems very obvious that there was a premeditated plan to get young Etzebeth. Their player started it Etzebeth retaliated in a mild fashion and then 4 or 5 english thugs rushed the young man of steel in one accord. Clearly an arranged move and clearly something none of them dared do on a man to man basis. Bwahahahahahahahahahahaha.

What was the outcome. Etzebeth emmeged unscathed  but the english thugs were umasked and their reputations in tatters! Note how gracefully Etzebeth took the dumbass refs comments. Superb self control. Etzebeth is the best lock in the wolrd right now and there are more to come!! All nz have is wee retardlick. Hahahhahahahahahaha

Now I do hope those two brolley waving ladies Becs and MO(NH) are out of town and not going to tune me grief on this matter as they should know I have hit the nail on the head as usual.

A few choice world re that bumbling ref Nigel are warranted. This twit managed to keep it a close game for the English. He had a bad day for sure although nowhere in the class of nz ref of the year - the deplorable bryce lawrence - if he had reffed we would have lost by 30 points.

So after the physical hammering they took at the hands of the Boks one wonders if england can get up for the abs game. If they can they could give the wee abs a very hard time.

As was agreed by Mallet etc - if england couldnt beat the Boks this time round it may be a long wait.

Salute Meyer for all he has achieved. Ten players left/retired and ten out injured. The longest season in history and he wins all three matches - he certainly has the ability to inspire. The post match interview shows what a fine man he is.  We would also be the Rugby championship winners also if Morne had kicked to his normal standards. If that is not meritorious then what is?

Plenty of egg for all the Meyer bashers!!

Beeno

I must admit that the incident you mentioned looked weird to me.   There was some really questionable play ofthe POMS before the incident happen and Etzebeth came through and tried to kick the ball - which Younge was trying to pick up.   The latter than grabbed at Etzebeth and also tried to hit him - and the next moment all the POMS rushed at Etzebeth.   Under the circumstances Etzebeth and the Springboks were somewhat restrained and I peronally think the ref should have penalized the POMS and not SA in that case.

I looked at the scrums again and the POMS used illegal scrumming techniques - whilst the Springboks got penalized.  He really was clueless in that regard.   Soon we will hear about a referee that is off the test panel as a result of incompetence.   By the way the ref he consulted on the Etzebeth issue was from New Zealand and he is on par with Bryce Lawrence - never saw the crooked line-out throws of the POMS and his advice was also bad in the Etzebeth case.   When will New Zealand ever produce decent referees??????

As to your praize singing in respect of Meyer - I will also sing his praizes if he made performance-based selections and not the duds that caused misery in all three tests.   Imagie any reasonable coach selecting Van der Linde, De Jongh, Jantjies and Steenkamp and leaving the rest of the team in the lurch.   Also think about the number of players he selected - whom he never intended to play in the first instance - ending up in a serious center problem for the Springboks.

Good coach he is - seriously flawed by deficient player selection that was in evidence throughout his coaching this year.

The poms got away with murder Mike!  A  guy called Barnacle made a half baked defence of England saying Jannie pulled the loose head down and in. It was all jannies fault!!!  I wonder if Barny believes in the tooth fairy!!!

Onother duffer tried to use the tired old excuse by saying the ref made mistkes that favoured us as well. THi sis the sam eguy who use dthe same line of argument re BL!!!! Quite possibly Nigel did but therecan be little doubt who got the better end of the deal.

Of the picks you mention only CJ flopped and largely because he played at tighthead. Steenkamp played well against England as the ratings show. Juan hardly smelt the ball and Jantjes , a reasonable selection didnt play. All the possble flyhalves were picked.
No to me the mistakes were no Jordaan and no Deon Fourie. Some may squeal that some youngsters were not selected but were they really ready - name the youngster who should have been selected who were not for starters.

Beeno1

Status: Rugby Legend
Posts: 3931 RE: English thugs unmasked
November 26, 2012, 12:56:55

The poms got away with murder Mike!  A  guy called Barnacle made a half baked defence of England saying Jannie pulled the loose head down and in. It was all jannies fault!!!  I wonder if Barny believes in the tooth fairy!!!

LOL. What a joke. I would like to read that halfbaked crap. Have you got a link ti that? I cannot wait to read how that moron got to that conclusion.

Bongani

I am a bit lost here - what did Janiie pulling a guy down have to do with the attack afterwards on Etzebeth?   Sounds to me like the POMS targetted Etzebeth to try and get him carded - should he loose his temper with them.   That after a POM tried to get him banned for an imaginary offence in the Scottish test.

Are they constantly trying to make assholes of themselves?

clevermike

Status: Rugby Legend
Posts: 2348 RE: English thugs unmasked
November 26, 2012, 13:37:54

Bongani

I am a bit lost here - what did Janiie pulling a guy down have to do with the attack afterwards on Etzebeth?   Sounds to me like the POMS targetted Etzebeth to try and get him carded - should he loose his temper with them.   That after a POM tried to get him banned for an imaginary offence in the Scottish test.

Are they constantly trying to make assholes of themselves?

Hey ou Maaikie. Wake up sunshine, and read the post that I quoted. I responded to Beeno who mentioned Jannie. Oh wait a minute. He is your tjomma. So that could be why you didn't jump on his back as well, or does it work like in rugby where you grind the one who retaliated?

Mike and Bongi I was referring to the scrum penalties awarded against us. The pom loosehead was clearly scrumming in and was the one that should have been penalised. This was the view of Mallet and the panelists as well.

NOT referring here to the Etzebeth incident but just to another example of the ref getting it wrong.

What I don't understand is the fact that Alex Corbisiero is known for doing this.... Why was he not looked at, Replays clearly show him scrumming in and Jannie got blown up. Cost us 6 points if i am not mistaken a posible 9 Points if the one wasn't missed. From a clear bad call.

I am not one to complain about the ref but really the calls against Jannie, the Penalty against flow not bieng on his feet when he clearly was and the fight incident are clear and obvious debateable calls.

The Alberts try is another disputed issue, not necceserily pointed at the ref though, at least this went with us, however debateble the try is against the rules. And yes you can validate that Alberts was posibly off side there, as well as validate that he was on side. There was either an rule loophole issue or a ref interpretation issue on this one. It could have gone both ways though.

Beeno, I understood. It is just Uncle Maaikie. He battles. Sometimes when he thinks 2+2=pineapple. LOL

Bongani

Sorry to disappoint - but Beeno and I differ too many times on issues and he really is not my pal - have you not seen how many times I clashed with him on this Board.   My real pals are Saffex and Mozart - but you won;t say that if you look at out posrings - now woould you?   I also enjoy your postings - and wish you all the best

Mike sorry to hear I dont make the grade!!  This preferrential treatment of Moz and snapster is total uncalled for bias!! Hahahahhahahahaha

 Ek and some others, the Flo penalty for "going off his feet" was just. Although he did not actually go off his feet, he did support his weight with his elbows. When his elbows went to ground he should have stopped playing the ball and got back up off his elbows first. It was actually a good technical call.

I warched  the Etzebeth incident again on TV tonight There was a maul situation and Etzebeth came through the maul and was not off-side.   The ball was in front of him on the ground.  he tried to kick it forward - when Younge tried to pick it up.   Younge than grabbed Eizebeth's jersey near the neck - he is to small to reach any higher and that was when five POMS attacked Etzebeth.   The whole lot went down and one POM player tried to hit him in the face.   The decision was weird -  Erzebeth in fact did nothing penalizeable and he did i fact not responded.   The POM whotried to hit Etzebeth while he was lieing on the ground should have been sent off and the POMD penalized.

I also saw the constant inward scrumming - it was so blatantly obvious that the ref should in fact sent to ref primary school teams - e would probably not get that right either.  

typical english pub thug gang mentality. did not surprise me at all but what worried me even more is that the bok forwards were not even close to helping him. when the english dogs ganged eben i saw a few hands and arms flying all over the place www.youtube.com/watch what did one expect from the land of the degenerate www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/news/4600828/100-of-Saviles-paedophile-pals-are-hunted.html#ixzz2A3heqOzz

i am quite sure the poms are not to happy with the fact that the old colony got one over them