Face it Lambie's dedication to flyhalf...

 It's a worry.

 Lets add a bit to that list of Mozart.   Fransie's dedication to center or flyhalf.  Pietersen's dedication to 13,  Alberts dedication to 7 or lock.  They have all failed in the past Super 15 and tests.   
Fransie sabotaged the Sharks backline and threw a hissyfit before the June tests.  Pietersen;s defense at 13 was a lottery ticket,  Alberts still cannot execute properly 60% of the functions of a loosie.
And then we have the reputation players - Morne Steyn (the Stade Francaid Reject),  Bakkies Botha  (who prrduced ZERO on the June Wellsh test and was then showed up by a rookie as being totally past it) and Victor Matfield (pushed out of the way in matches and proved to be physically deficient).
Weird  

 Utility.........?

 Theres a lot of kak on here let me shed some truth....

Hougaard: Hougaard has actually played some great rugby both for the Sharks and Boks at 9! But everyone wants him to fail because he is a bool. Take the opener against the Sharks. he was the fall guy because of supposed bad kicking but he only made ONE bad kick the entire game and the try conceded shouldnt have been one because kankowski was miles offside. he is the best we've got to compare to du preez. The other next best is reinach who you hate mozart! Either one is better than the useless biatch pienaar who literally is useless kicking (something he is supposed to be good at!).

Lambie: Lambie cannot be compared to Hougaard because he hasnt had a standout individual performance at any level of the game. Hougaard never had five years hype like he was the coming of jesus or something. Lambie is just a plodder that was never any good from the start showing no signs of talent at all. remember in 2010 he came on against ireland? when morne left the field the boks were trouncing the irish but lambie nearly blew that game. that patter has been repeating itself for years! but hey he is a shark (anti-bool) so we must select him anyway because morne arz a bool ya know.

JJ: He showed some good touches but he looks so much like a wing. The problem is that the bulls havent had a good 13 since the 90s. so they play him at 13 but it hasnt worked but part of that problem has been serfontein too. A 13 needs to work in tandem with the movement of the 12. serf has no movement and really bad hands and he is really slow. so i dont think we really know what he can do on attack but there was flashes of ability. he is really pap on defence though. but i say serf is the worst of the two in my most humble opinion.

Coenie: im not really sure what to make of him but i think he is not a great scrummager in either position. his great attribute is his powerful ball carrying. he operates like a loose forward at times. but nearly all of our props are only good in general play so whats new?

Mike, you talk kak man. fransie has been the best shark by far all year. he frickin well carried this team on his back to the semis pal. whats with this nonsense you post some great stuff then ruin it by blowing yur load on the same players all the time. dont end up like cheezer!