FIXTURESNo upcoming fixtures — check back soon.
FORUM / RUGBY /  Famous SA Rugby families

Famous SA Rugby families

Started by clevermike5 REPLIES235 VIEWS· 09 Oct 2014, 00:32
SHAREXFACEBOOKWHATSAPPTELEGRAMREDDITLINKEDIN
CL
clevermikeCoach57,555 posts
09 Oct 2014, 00:32
#1
09 Oct 2014, 00:32#1

We have two examples in the Springbok team - namely


*   Francois Louw - the grandson of Jan Pickard; and 

*   Pieter-Steph du Toit - the grandson of Piet  Spiere du Toit.


Both felix and his sone Morne du Plessis were Springbok captins. 


I can think of the Du Plessis brothers -  Wilie, Michael and Carel - who all played for WP and the Springboks and  came forom the Eastern Cape.   I think one of their sons played for the SA Under 20 squad inthe recent Junior WC for SA.   


Then there was also Du Preez - who has had three sons - all of them JWC team members recently - one was injured and could not go.   


Anymore othr member can think of?

   

Flashdakota
FlashdakotaClub Pro805 posts
09 Oct 2014, 00:52
#2
09 Oct 2014, 00:52#2
removed post
RO
RooinekCaptain18,117 posts
09 Oct 2014, 07:13
#3
09 Oct 2014, 07:13#3
A thread about famous SA rugby families without a mention of the Morkel family?
Andrew, Boy, Dougie, Gerhard, Harry, Henry, Jacky, Pieter, Royal and Sommie were all brothers or cousins and all 10 played for the Springboks during the early 1900s.
CL
clevermikeCoach57,555 posts
09 Oct 2014, 07:36
#4
09 Oct 2014, 07:36#4
 Rooinek
There were also the Nels - who played in the 1930's and came from the Greytown area.I remember the story of PRT.  He was the Springbok captain in 1938 tour of New Zealand and was regarded as a giant at the time.  He was a 6'1" lock.   Nowadays most backline players are much taller than that.    
BL
bluebokPro3,977 posts
09 Oct 2014, 09:16
#5
09 Oct 2014, 09:16#5
Interesting stuff gents. The fact that a 6'1" person could play lock is almost funny. I am 6'3" and am barely tall enough to play as a loosie! 
Not to open a can of worms or anything, but down purely to an improved availability of food, and humans are a third bigger and taller than they were 2000 years ago. Seems pretty evolutionary to me. 
RO
RooinekCaptain18,117 posts
09 Oct 2014, 09:23
#6
09 Oct 2014, 09:23#6
Indeed bluebok, I wonder how the rabid anti-darwinists like Baboon-ou would explain this?

My guess is he'll churn out a whole lot of copy and pastes that talk about something else entirely and then pretend he's addressed the question . . followed by loads of emoticons which all claim that the atheists have been beaten again. That's what he normally does.
— END OF THREAD —

More from Rugby

More news