@mikey,
i would love to hear ur theory on the scoring system, cos it seems more of an interprtaion of how the game actually performs.
on foxsport, the scoring is very simple, players who make line breaks, tackle breaks, try assists, score trys, and most tackles and runs, make more points then those who dont.
here are stats free from an independent medium for ben smiths game and jaco tautes first spXV game,,,
Pos
T/A
Pts
K/P/R
MR
CB
DB
OL
TO
Tack
LO
Pen
Y/R
FB
Taute
0/0
0
8/7/19
110
0
1
1
1
3/1
0/0
0
0/0
Pos
T/A
Pts
K/P/R
MR
CB
DB
OL
TO
Tack
LO
Pen
Y/R
FB
BR Smith
1/1
5
0/12/12
97
5
6
3
0
2/2
0/0
0
0/0
ben smith has a try assist and a try, taute has neither
ben smith has 5 line breaks to tautes zero.
ben smith has tackle breaks to tautes one.
ben smith has three offloads to tautes one.
ben smith has zero errors, to tatues one.
ben smith makes two tackles and misses two, while tautes makes 3 tackles and misses 1.
and testrugby .com thinks they both equall??? WTF???
keep in mind these stats arent from foxsport either, but they had similar stats as well.
i do like the idea of making money to futher enhance ur team, but their is value in picking players who are cheap but effective.
for testrugby i might start picking players who dont attack, as that seems to be the main points criteria, then again im just grumpy cos im 8th, LMAO, :oP
but al jokes aside, taute being just as good as ben smith in thier one and only games they have played, is there anyone here who agrees with that???