Sasue
I think that we manage to make a serious mess of the players we select. For myself I fall for rubbish all the time. I can name a whole lot of players that played well in the intitial stages of the competition and have gone sour afterwards.
In my view the following players were proved to have feet of clay:-
Ben Smith
He played well in the first game between the Blues and the Highlanders - and since then was somewhere between avrage and mediocre. Obviously following him is not a good idea.
Charles Piutau
Same as Ben Smith
Julian Savea and Conrad Smith
They showed up well in one game and then went fishin as well. At least Smith scored a try - but otherwise they did nothing at all. A rookie like Serfontein scored more points than Smith - What does that tell us?
Gerald Anscombe and All the flyhalfs
Anscombe did well in the first game and after that went AWOL. Cruden,and Carter never got more than 29 points in games they played in and seems to be very average virtually all the time. Cooper got 54 points in one game and was very average to mediocre in the other 6 games he played in. Barrett never made 25 points in any game he played in. Lambie did best of the lot and then played a shocker in the Rebels game.
GeorgeSmith
Instead of taking note of the fact that Smith should have been penalized fr playing illegally in making two of his four turnovers - I fell for the hype and he was penalized regularly this week. Should never have ruined my Test Rugby selections to bring him on Board.
SUMMARY
I can go on and on about it - how I fell for the hype all the time and then find out that the top players buggers up constantly. The fact that I catered for the Smiths and Savea ruined me not only this weelk - but is going to cost me dearly next week.
Am I the only idiot that do not pick my team on own believes and and performances that can be regarded as flash - in - the - pan performances?
.


