FIXTURESNo upcoming fixtures — check back soon.
FORUM / RUGBY /  Five lessons from the past weekend's Super Rugby final, according to CRAIG LEWIS.

Five lessons from the past weekend's Super Rugby final, according to CRAIG LEWIS.

Started by bobbok...7 REPLIES570 VIEWS· 07 Aug 2016, 12:22
SHAREXFACEBOOKWHATSAPPTELEGRAMREDDITLINKEDIN
BO
bobbok...Captain10,129 posts
07 Aug 2016, 12:22
#1
07 Aug 2016, 12:22#1


Lions’ season should still be celebrated
In the midst of the disappointment that follows the Lions’ loss to the Hurricanes in Saturday’s final, we should not lose sight of what a special season it has still been for the Johannesburg-based side. Not only did they deservedly finish top of the South African group and progress to the playoffs for the first time since 2001 (then as the Cats), but they also impressively reached their first-ever final after clinching resounding playoff wins over the Crusaders and Highlanders. Moreover, it was their attractive and game-changing style of rugby that should be celebrated. The Lions’ efforts over the course of the campaign defied the perception that South African teams can’t play with the sort of skill and freedom that has so long been associated with New Zealand rugby. Although the Lions fell at the final hurdle, they should be serious contenders next year when they face off against the Australian sides during the conference stage. But for now, they certainly still deserve plenty of plaudits for embracing a brand of rugby that has provided a much-needed feel-good factor for South African rugby.

Conditions, tactical execution and errors cost Lions
While the Lions’ success this season should certainly still be celebrated, there is no doubt that there will be some frustration at the manner in which they came unstuck against the Hurricanes. Despite the fact that wet weather had been expected in Wellington, they failed to make the necessary tactical adjustments on game day, and played far too much rugby in their own half, while their kicking did leave a lot to be desired at times. The Lions should have also expected to face a ferocious Hurricanes rush defence, and yet they looked rather rattled by the ferocity of the hosts’ line speed, and ultimately Faf de Klerk and Elton Jantjies didn’t have the time or space to run the game as they would have liked. The Lions’ handling also let them down in the wet weather (they knocked the ball on 14 times), and ultimately the tactically superior Canes were able to feast on errors and keep the scoreboard ticking over as they scored two opportunistic tries.

If you have the opportunity to top the overall log, take it
Hindsight is a perfect science, but one has to wonder whether the Lions’ brains trust would make a different decision if they were able to rewind the clock to the week before their final conference clash against the Jaguares. The Lions opted to rest all of their top players for this clash, and while it enabled the team’s first-choice contingent to be fresh for a home quarter-final and semi-final, it also effectively saw the Johannesburg-based side sacrifice top spot in the overall standings. As a result, the Hurricanes ended up hosting the final in typically adverse conditions that they would have been far more accustomed to. There’s really no point questioning the ifs and buts of the selection decision ahead of the Jaguares conference clash, but there is a lesson to be learned in that if you have a chance to top the overall log, this should be seen as a priority. No overseas team has won a final in New Zealand, and the odds were always heavily stacked against the Lions when they had to travel to Wellington. If the title decider had been held at Ellis Park, we may well be celebrating the Lions’ first-ever Super Rugby title.

Defence wins matches
There can be no denying that the Hurricanes’ incredible defence provided the foundation for their victories throughout the knockout stage. In their semi-final against the Chiefs, the Canes had to make 113 tackles to 68, and yet they still managed to repeatedly thwart the Chiefs’ attack and keep the visitors from scoring a single try. Against the Lions, they again had to make plenty more tackles than their opponents, but their line speed effectively turned defence into attack, while they cut down the time and space that Faf de Klerk and Elton Jantjies would have desired. This season, the Canes have had a decent 84.8% tackle success rate, but it’s really been the slow-poison effect of their rush defence that has been a hallmark of their success. They didn’t concede a single try throughout the playoffs, and that about says it all.

Hurricanes are deserved champs
Beyond lamenting a missed opportunity for the Lions, there really can be no denying that the Hurricanes are worthy champs. The Canes cruised through the conference stage of the competition before finishing with a flourish to suddenly shoot to the top of the overall standings on the final weekend of regular-season action. They continued to ride this wave of momentum in the knockout phase, with the Kiwi side embracing an effective all-round brand of rugby perfectly suited to playoff rugby. Their defence complemented efficient attack, while their appreciation for a strong kicking game and solid set piece provided a foundation for a historic Super Rugby title. They finished the season in the top five in terms of tries scored, clean breaks, carries, metres made, defenders beaten and scrum success. After finishing as runners-up last year, they shored up their shortcomings and ultimately emerged as completely deserved champs in 2016.

Photo: Simon Watts/Getty Images


JW
Just_winCaptain18,570 posts
07 Aug 2016, 15:50
#2
07 Aug 2016, 15:50#2
 Good article that sums it up well, many of us have made the same points on other threads. 
In defence of the Lions, knowing what the opposition is going to do & even knowing what you should do to counter it doesn't mean that you can counter it in a game. The Lions must have know they would face the rush defence but they couldn't execute a good kicking game to counter it. The same was true for the Canes, the Lions managed to keep the backs in check, we didn't see any spectacular plays from their backs. The tries were opportunistic. The Lions gave it their best shot against heavy odds. They are a young team & will be better for it next year.
WA
WardadPro6,663 posts
08 Aug 2016, 02:08
#3
08 Aug 2016, 02:08#3
 According to Plum-bob strange-pants the Canes rushing defence was offside 14 times in the Canes thrashing of them in Jo'burg .Maybe the Canes were responsible for the Lions knocking on 14 times in the final with their supposedly always offside defence that only plum can see.
BE
Beeno1Captain40,032 posts
08 Aug 2016, 09:42
#4
08 Aug 2016, 09:42#4
 The Lions should have also expected to face a ferocious Hurricanes rush defence, and yet they looked rather rattled by the ferocity of the hosts’ line speed, and ultimately Faf de Klerk and Elton Jantjies didn’t have the time or space to run the game as they would have liked.
SUBSTITUTE THE WORDS LINE SPEED WITH CAMPING OFF SIDES AND YOU WILL ARRIVE AT THE CORRECT CONCLUSION.
APART FROM THIS HUGE FACTOR THE WEATHER CERTAINLY DIDN'T HELP NOR DID THE TRAVEL.  TAKING EVERYTHING INTO ACCOUNT IT IS CLEAR THE LIONS ARE THE BETTER SIDE. LIONS WOULD WIN COMFORTABLY AT ELLIS PARK. NOBODY CAN RIGHTLY ARGUE WITH THAT!
PL
PlumCaptain21,007 posts
08 Aug 2016, 11:03
#5
08 Aug 2016, 11:03#5
Wardad, as I said. The video is there. Go and look at at it. You won't will you? As soon as someone suggests anything you don't like then insults follow. Funny I didn't see you sprinting to the defence of Jaco Pepper? Nor did I see you making the same complaint about home refs as you guys did when the Lions got a home ref for the semi. More biased Kiwi trash. NOTE; the Lions home game vs the Canes had a local ref. GO Look at the tape! But ok, uncle Wardad. Let's imagine for a sec the final was in SA with Jaco Peyper reffing. I'm sure you and the Kiwi contingent would be oh so happy. Especially considering the whinging already done about the Lions semi and it's ref. You just strike me as a hypocritical tosser who can't wait to run his mouth. I'm sorry. Let's see. How does one team being off-side regularly influence another team into make handling errors? You really need me to explain that? How am i supposed to respect your opinion? You don't make a great deal of sense and your arguments are very thin. I don't think you ever received a tertiary education because your points strike me very much as construction site logic. You are/were a manual laborer right? I'm willing to examine myself and see why I consider myself to be biased but you are just happy to plod along. All those years of wearing a hard hat will do that to ya. Nothing wrong with a good days work, just doesn't do much for the IQ. The lunch time tabloids don't do much to help the situation either mate. Here let me construct a Wardad sentence for you... Plum(insult) you (insult) can't you see that your (insult) is completely wrong you (insult). Well done sir.
BO
bobbok...Captain10,129 posts
08 Aug 2016, 11:34
#6
08 Aug 2016, 11:34#6
 Plum, the Canes played 300 minutes (that's 60 versus Crusaders plus the three playoffs) culminating in achieving the astonishing result of not conceding a solitary try . If, like you & Beano suggest their amazing defensive record was achieved by persistent offside play then surely we would've heard the bleating from both NZ & SA .

Dunno boet, except for you & Beano ( there's got to be a poem there), nobody, anywhere, is using that excuse .
WA
WardadPro6,663 posts
08 Aug 2016, 11:52
#7
08 Aug 2016, 11:52#7
 Plum I have 2 degrees one of them in ancient history ,and I used to be a shearer and also a soldier before obtaining an applied science degree as well .Your just some sad arsed git who like beeno is seeing things that only exist in your grossly enlarged craniums or is it the rest of the world that cant see it eh ?Farking tosspot get a clue better still stop smoking ganja long enough for it to at least clear your lungs let alone your empty skull .Conspiracy theories eh ? pfffftttt.
PL
PlumCaptain21,007 posts
08 Aug 2016, 13:04
#8
08 Aug 2016, 13:04#8
Bok, that's why I am looking at the tapes. I'm trying to underatand how skewed my view is. I know I am biased to a degree, but that ain't the whole story. Wardad, a soldier and and sheep shearer. Now I get it. Seems both your degrees haven't taught you the difference between "You're" and "Your". That's what happens when you get em from cereal boxes. Applied sciences. Haha! Ganja is my excuse. What's yours?
— END OF THREAD —

More from Rugby

More news