FIXTURESNo upcoming fixtures — check back soon.
FORUM / RUGBY /  FraNs Steyn misses out on Rugby rich list

FraNs Steyn misses out on Rugby rich list

Started by Beeno19 REPLIES172 VIEWS· 13 Jun 2014, 09:46
SHAREXFACEBOOKWHATSAPPTELEGRAMREDDITLINKEDIN
BE
Beeno1Captain40,032 posts
13 Jun 2014, 09:46
#1
13 Jun 2014, 09:46#1


Ex Sport 24

Cape Town - Frans Steyn would have been among the Top 5 best paid rugby players on the planet had he opted to stay in France two years ago.

Steyn, 27, shocked the rugby fraternity on Tuesday when he pulled of out the Boks' Incoming Series in June.

It has since emerged that Steyn pulled out due to a dispute over money with the South African Rugby Union (SARU).

His father, Piet Steyn, said SARU did not adhere to a contractual promise they had made to his son. The monetary promise was made by SARU before Steyn returned from French club, Racing Metro, to play for the Sharks in 2012.

According to Thursday's Die Burger, Steyn would have earned between R8m and R9m per year if he stayed at Racing Metro - which would have put him in the Top 5 global list. (Ou Maaaikie can Steyn really be as bad as you make out? NO WONDER FRANS IS PEEEVED AT SARFU PULLING A FAST ONE - IF THAT' S THE CASE - LEST I BE SUED - HAHHAHAHAHA)

Interestingly, the world's Top 10 best paid rugby players all play in France, with two South Africans -Bryan Habana and Bakkies Botha - in the current Top 10.

The current Top 10 best rugby earners in the world - via Die Burger:

1. Jonny Wilkinson (Toulon - R9.7m per year)
2. Jonathan Sexton (Racing Metro - R9m per year)
3. Bryan Habana (Toulon - R8.7m per year)
4. Morgan Parra (Clermont Auvergne - R7.5 per year)
5. Thierry Dusautoir (Toulouse - R7.5m per year)
6. Dimitri Szarzewski (Racing Metro - R7.1m per year)
7. Carl Hayman (Toulon - R7.1m per year)
8. Bakkies Botha (Toulon - R7.1m per year)
9. Jamie Roberts (Racing Metro - R6.9m per year)
10. Matt Giteau (Toulon - R6.9m per year)

CL
CleanCutPro9,905 posts
13 Jun 2014, 10:38
#2
13 Jun 2014, 10:38#2
 
It's absurd paying the useless Bakkies that amount.

For what?

Too many garlic snails has rotted their brain.

Crazy Frenchmen!!
BE
Beeno1Captain40,032 posts
13 Jun 2014, 10:46
#3
13 Jun 2014, 10:46#3
Bakkies may still be up for a good 60 minutes - we shall see against Wales. Matfiled never was as he is NOT a tight foward.
You dont pay that money for rubbish. These guys are NOT that dumb.We should clarify a lot of matters after the Welsh tests.
The hard truth is SA Rugby needs a huge wake up call. This is a professional game. Things like restructing the provinces, central contracting and player drain need to be addressed. The merit principle needs to be adopted unreservedly as well.
We must not go on with this amateurish approach. 
CE
CeradynePro9,374 posts
13 Jun 2014, 11:50
#4
13 Jun 2014, 11:50#4
 CleanCut

Status: Bok regular 
Posts: 1568RE: FraNs Steyn misses out on Rugby rich list
June 13, 2014, 08:38:49 
It's absurd paying the useless Bakkies that amount. 

For what?

Too many garlic snails has rotted their brain. 

Crazy Frenchmen!!




To help them win two consecutive Heineken Cups and the Top14.
Beeno1

Status: Hall Of Fame 
Posts: 10090RE: FraNs Steyn misses out on Rugby rich list
June 13, 2014, 08:46:17Bakkies may still be up for a good 60 minutes - we shall see against Wales. Matfiled never was as he is NOT a tight foward.
You dont pay that money for rubbish. These guys are NOT that dumb.We should clarify a lot of matters after the Welsh tests.
The hard truth is SA Rugby needs a huge wake up call. This is a professional game. Things like restructing the provinces, central contracting and player drain need to be addressed. The merit principle needs to be adopted unreservedly as well.
We must not go on with this amateurish approach. 




How many games, in his entire career, have you seen Bakkies play more than 60 minutes?
BE
Beeno1Captain40,032 posts
13 Jun 2014, 12:02
#5
13 Jun 2014, 12:02#5
That is not relevant. I am suggesting he could still be able to play for 60 minutes.One of the huge mistakes was to make wee matfield his Bok partner. The next daft decision was to leave matfiled on and take off the real lock Bakkies. HOwever one could argue Bakkies having done the work of two locks needed to be subbed - Bwhahahahahahahaha
Hope that clarifes things for you windpomp.
CE
CeradynePro9,374 posts
13 Jun 2014, 12:17
#6
13 Jun 2014, 12:17#6
 Uhmmm. I think it was more a matter of Bakkies being made Victor's Bok partner, and Bulls partner of that matter. Victor joined the Bulls and became a Bok a year earlier than Bakkies.
Hope that clarifies things for you ou Beenbal.
MO
moolaaPro2,380 posts
13 Jun 2014, 14:17
#7
13 Jun 2014, 14:17#7
 Hasbeeno, typing "Bwahahahahaha"" etc etc after every point you make does not necessarily make you right. It's getting a wee bit tiresome...Please develop a new and improved strategy.
BE
Beeno1Captain40,032 posts
13 Jun 2014, 14:25
#8
13 Jun 2014, 14:25#8
 windpomp only the most extreme hatter re lock play would rate the pap victor 106 kg above the great Bakkies.
Moooooo la la la please apply yourself to making your first sensible post.Thanks
KI
kingcornPro3,695 posts
13 Jun 2014, 15:24
#9
13 Jun 2014, 15:24#9
The biggest screw up that SARU made is on their foreign player selection policy. Frans came back to play for the boks as he never really got a look in while abroad. But when Meyer came in 2012, that all started to change. I can see why Frans is miffed. There are 10 foreign based players in the squad which is a ridiculous amount of players. Fransie might as well stayed put and had the best of both worlds. SARU got him to sign until 2015 which means that he is now stuck. 
Most players will stay put if they had the opportunity to play for the boks, but when you start selecting a 3rd of your squad from abroad, you will not have many good players left in SA as is evident in SA Super Rugby teams performance this year. I would say if a player haven't cracked the boks team by 26 - 27 then by all means they should go abroad. But now we have freaking Goosen at the age of 21 going off to Frans and will probably still get selected for the boks. 
Players can extend their careers up to the age 35 or on average 33. That means if they were to leave SA at 27, they would still have between 6 - 8 years of getting good money and if they left at 26, still a chance of playing for a foreign team. 
The conditioning of rugby players have been far better in recent years which means that their careers have been extended, regardless of the amount of games they play. 
My basic policy would be that I would only select foreign players if they have been part of the bok setup for the last 3 years and have consistently featured in test matches and are over the age of 27. 
The only foreign players that I would use from the current squad would be
Definates- Habana- Fourie du Preez 

Reserves- Louw- Botha- Juan Smith- Ruan Pienaar

The rest would simply not be included. I would also work on a plan not to be over reliant on them but rather look at filling this positions with new up and coming talent. 
SARU has simply not invested enough in our locks, wings and scrumhalves. 
CE
CeradynePro9,374 posts
13 Jun 2014, 15:28
#10
13 Jun 2014, 15:28#10
 Ahhhh, ou Beenbal back to ducking and diving again. Trying to avoid your little balls-up?
— END OF THREAD —

More from Rugby

More news