FIXTURESNo upcoming fixtures — check back soon.
FORUM / RUGBY /  Fried Fish on the menu in Christchurch in 6 days time.

Fried Fish on the menu in Christchurch in 6 days time.

Started by generaltit8 REPLIES202 VIEWS· 11 May 2014, 12:57
SHAREXFACEBOOKWHATSAPPTELEGRAMREDDITLINKEDIN
GE
generaltitPro3,164 posts
11 May 2014, 12:57
#1
11 May 2014, 12:57#1

Looking at Saders right now they are going to have the Sharks for breakfast,still got headache from yesterday...a feeble and disgusting exhibition...I'm siding with Mike...FS has definitely lost it...cost the Sharks the game but it really looks the rest as well is not hungry and 10 man rugby continues...high risk Saders style versus suicide 10 man rugby = slaughter on Tenth Ave on the 17th May.

 

I was very wrong about FS...he's just not hungry anymore and got non chalant attitude.

 

The Saders will whip the Sharks butt unless there's Lambie (which I doubt, he's not ready...a very outside chance if the game plan is changed and either Swiel or Zeilinga starts @ 10.

JW
Just_winCaptain18,570 posts
11 May 2014, 13:27
#2
11 May 2014, 13:27#2
Sader s had red snapper today & will have shark for diner next week, lol 
CL
clevermikeCoach57,555 posts
11 May 2014, 13:32
#3
11 May 2014, 13:32#3
 Seb
Zeilinga has been sent back to SA with an injury and Steyn is clueless and lackluster.   In the process he kills backline play completely - did that at center as well.   
Lets say the fish is going to be preceded by shark fin soup.   
I think White's blood is boiling after that performance and he may just decide with what is produced at present, thr Sharks will definitely lose and he is going to drop Steyn to the bench and starts with a backline that can at least pass balls.
A ch ange is long overdue.       
WA
WardadPro6,663 posts
11 May 2014, 13:43
#4
11 May 2014, 13:43#4
 "Flake " as some Aussies call it ' shark and taties " [fish and chups !]That was an old fashioned rogering the hapless reds just received "ouch !"
BE
Beeno1Captain40,032 posts
11 May 2014, 16:30
#5
11 May 2014, 16:30#5
Arrogant kbbs talking a up  a storm supported by ou maaaaikie and Seb - most unfortunate behaviour from these two luminaries.
If Sharks play well they can of course beat the wee crusaders. No question about it.But of course they will most likely have to overcome the bent ref as well and that makes it quite a  task. Just recall what happened to the Lions!!!No wonder the kiwis are confident. Bwahahahahhahahahaha
Redsman is probably watching league were I understand Oz rule the kiwis.
So kbbs always remember pride comes before a fall.
Beeno giving the kbbs some much needed perpective. 





3K
3ku1Pro2,580 posts
11 May 2014, 17:03
#6
11 May 2014, 17:03#6
Oh well you give up Beeno, everyones sick of your obnoxious, never ending predictable posts about bent kiwi refs bla bla bla bla. At least acknowledge Saders were awesome, its becoming beyond a joke now, and a clichie, the ref is one person. Maybe you stop acting everytime theirs a controversary that it must mean bent refs, sometimes yea theyre only human, but its not predetermined. And says little about your knowledge about league, seeing the Warriors Nz team put 50 on another Aussie side.
GE
generaltitPro3,164 posts
11 May 2014, 22:16
#7
11 May 2014, 22:16#7

Jake will become Hake if he persists with this game plan...a great mentor he is but I'm not so sure anymore on the technicalities...probably is more interested in an international appointment and has changed his target in rugby...maybe he has been offered the job in Australia secretly already and his mission is not dependant on it...he is a strange man that shows great results on strategic points a good mentor but a paradox but has not the Ian Mc Intosh or Kitch Christie factor that I thought he had...he has talent but it appears he has a selfish , egoistic trait that appears now and again...he tends to be a man pleaser or people pleaser and has lost focus on the Sharks mission...it's time for SA rugby to play 15 man rugby...we are tired and so are the forwards of this 10 man crap.

 

NZ'ers play full men rugby and they do it well...we used to do that and even after Naas Botha...the Sharks used to play it with imports like Thierry La Croix and Martin Hernandez...and Freddie Michalak...they take control of the backline...this hoisting and nonsensical kicking is embarrassing...it worked a few times in the past but now it's constant and every opposition reads it easily. It works for France occassionally but the Frogs are objective in it and clever when it's not expected but with us it's predictable...senseless kicking never making it's mark and giving possession into the hands of NZ'ers who know how to attack and exploit it...it is really so stupid.

 

A fool is somebody that never learns from his mistakes and keeps repeating it. We have a fools mentality in SA rugby.

JW
Just_winCaptain18,570 posts
11 May 2014, 23:02
#8
11 May 2014, 23:02#8
 I think a "mean boil" is called for & why limit it to fish, lol
AB
ABasquefanPro2,549 posts
12 May 2014, 00:02
#9
12 May 2014, 00:02#9
 next saturday the 10 man gameplan is gonna be crushed and all sharks' and SA rugby's deficiencies exposed, and they have many of them. This sharks team has nothing to do before an inform saders, nothing at all.
Another easy 4 try-bonus point victory for the saders for topping the NZ conference ( if the brumbies hadn't played one more game they would top the general table too... but this will come later).
This is gonna be an embarrasing defeat for the best SA team and will mark the saders' superiority in sharks' players' mind coming the playoffs.

@beeno,
"If Sharks play well they can of course beat the wee crusaders. No question about it."

this is a truism. Every team that play well can beat any other team. But it's impossible that this sharks team will play well against this saders team at Xchurch and therefore beat them. No question about it
— END OF THREAD —

More from Rugby

More news