Here the Board's second biggest liar shoots himself in the foot

clevermike

Status: Hall Of Fame
Posts: 13712 RE: Carbuncle....
October 29, 2014, 20:46:14  Shall I list the numbr of tests lost since 2012 or drawn - because of Morne Steyn's poor performances:-
*   The test against England in June 1012 - Morne was piss poor in that game - so much so that the crowd booed him;
*   The Mendsa test against Argentina his decisionmaking was a major problem
*    The Dunedin test in 2012
*    The Ellis Park test in 2012

Here's the Ellis Park team in 2012....note the absence of Morne Steyn. This is the second such incident, Adi Jacobs was also cited for poor play by this idiot in a game he never played in.....a rampant liar

 

FBZane Kirchner14WBryan Habana13CJaco Taute12CJean de Villiers (c)11WFrancois Hougaard10FHJohan Goosen9SHRuan Pienaar1PTendai Mtawarira2HAdriaan Strauss3PJannie du Plessis4LEben Etzebeth5LAndries Bekker6FFrancois Louw7FWillem Alberts8N8Duane Vermeulen  Replacements16HTiaan Liebenberg17PCoenie Oosthuizen18LFlip van der Merwe19FMarcell Coetzee20FHElton Jantjies21CJuan de Jongh22FBPat Lambie

 

 Mozart
Sortry it was a typing error - the game referred to was the Ellis Park test in 2013.
Everyone realizes that Morne was so piss poor in 2012 -  he was dropped after the  Dunedin test.
So now you have started a thread on that one - you must really feel like a fool.  Stupid old bastard we have here.

 Hey Coward.....how did you conclude that I am fat?

Oh it was a typing error. No it was a lie.  

 Balls.  Every one knows that Morne was a major part of the reason why we lost the Ellis Park test last year.   So why should I lie about the test - brainless idiot?
Incidentally a liar is someone that turns one missed tackle into "missed tackles" and one penalty awarded against a player into "penalties".    G uess who does that regularly on this site?

 Moffie I am waiting you low life coward

Because you lie all the time ...this is just one in a long list. Goosen was flyhalf that day, and he did screw up...the Abs ran right over him to score a try. Perhaps you have the two confused.

 Mozart 
S eee the following paragraph I added fto the message:-
Incidentally a liar is someone that turns one missed tackle into "missed tackles" and one penalty awarded against a player into "penalties".    G uess who does that regularly on this site?

 Moffie I am waiting

Try running the tap Vetsak,  it helps you early onset prostate types get relief. 

 Answer the question you pathetic coward stop ducking. Are you a little scared of being exposed?
How on earth can you conclude I am fat when you have not seen me in 7 years?
Put your foot in it did you not.....messing with the wrong bloke Lew ...or what is your name again?

Mozart
I know Goosen was the flyhalf in the 2012 Ellis Park game.   He got injured (knee-injury) - so how did he screw up BSter?   Kindly remember Goosen was being treated for an injury to his knee inthe in-goal area - and like Sasue said at the time - he got up from the injury spot and tried unsuccessfully to tackle Sam Whitelock.  Sasue said  that  - in view of the seriousness of the injury - he was very brave to do that.
Anoither of your utterly misleading/ trut-deficent contributions - are you not ashamed to be caught out time and time again ? 
 

You used his injury as an excuse for missing that tackle before. And then I pointed out to you he was only subbed 9 minutes after after the try was scored....and blew up that little theory. 

 Hell - but you are the top liar on this site.  Goosen injury happened at about minute 20 when Read bumped into his knee.  He was being treated for it - when the ball went to Taute and the latter failed to find touch and the resulted move resulted in the Whitelock try.
After he was treated - he tried to carry on - was treated twice afterwards and then replaced.  
Get for a change the facts right and stop misleading people on this site.    

 2510 - 5Whitelock - try3310 - 12AL Smith - try
Carter - conversion34Jantjies - sub on
Goosen - sub off 
So whose lying? He played on for 9 minutes after the Whitelock try. He was able to get into perfect position to make the tackle...he simply missed it. And if he was unable to play on afterwards he shouldn't have stayed on for 9 minutes...in that time span NZ scored another try. That try started with Nonu making ground in the Goosen tackle. Staying on doesn't  seem to be serving the team, mostly serving himself.

 I know that Gooosen was treated t hree times for the injury before he was actually replaced.   His injury occurred when Read bumped into his knee at roundabout minute 20 - and he was in fact been treated when the Whitelock try was scored.
Just a question - why did the ball goto Taute - who missed the line kick preceeding the Whitelock try - if Goosen was available?  He was not hence the problem situation.     
Get your facts right before you write misleding garbage.    

I never said, he was available. He was being treated near the corner where the try was scored. He got up, perhaps because he saw the move and hobbled over to the tackle point....brave perhaps. But he then made a pathetic high tackle attempt 5 metres out on Whitelock. Following that incident if he was hurt Jantjies should have come on...his poor attempt on Nonu set up another try.
Those are the facts.

 
An the board's arsehole continues trying to prove a point ... not sure what the point is ... doubt the fool knows himself.

Seriously needs to get laid.

He needs help these days cause of the arthritis in his wrists.

 Liar again - the try was scored about 30 meters from where Goosen was being treated.  Looking at ot from the AB side the try was scored on he extreme left of the field - Goosen was treated about 15 meter from the other side of the field.
There is no evidence at all that Goosen was involved in the try scored by Aaron Smith five minutes later.  Statistically Goosen did not miss a sibngle tackle while he was on the field of play - he made the tackle on Whitelock - but Whitelock was able to stretch out and place the ball.  How he made a mess of a tackle on Nonu only you could come up with that.

These allegations made by you  are not facts - they are manufactured garbage as is normal with you.

Goosen was being treated on the intersection of the two lines 5 metres from goal line and 15 metres from touch in the corner the try was scored.
I'd ask you to apologize, but what's the point....you clearly feel no shame calling another poster dishonest, when you have the facts wrong yourself.

 Balls - he was trated from the area where Taute kicked t he ball and that was where he was injured too.  The try was score don the opposite side of the field.  I'd ask YOU to apologize, but what's the point....you clearly feel no shame calling another poster dishonest, when you have the facts wrong yourself.
You had the facts wrong in th first instance about Goosen.

I have just looked at the video...but that's it, we are done.  

CC if you saw it you would not want to get laid!!!  

Which is why you frothed at the mouth about how distinguished I looked...hey Dave. You just can't get your foot out of your mouth can you Versak.  

Was I talking about you Coward............or should I call you Lorna?  

Call me what you like....the low character of the source inoculates me from any emotional reaction.   

Wow that is rich coming from a coward  

 I m delighted Mozart calls me the Board secod biggest liar.   He being in his view such an exalted person - remains the Boards biggest liar of course.  What a way to go for a person on an unbelievable ego-trip. 
Superiority breeds contempt and that is all I fe el for him and his deficient knowledge of rugby.