FIXTURESNo upcoming fixtures — check back soon.
FORUM / RUGBY /  Highlander Flying Kick Red Card

Highlander Flying Kick Red Card

Started by Plum32 REPLIES1,223 VIEWS· 19 May 2018, 12:08
SHAREXFACEBOOKWHATSAPPTELEGRAMREDDITLINKEDIN
PL
PlumCaptain21,007 posts
19 May 2018, 12:08
#1
19 May 2018, 12:08#1

https://youtube.com/watch?v=ybhE3nIPB9U

00:30 seconds for the flying kick.

 ...red card for intentional kick to the face by the catcher.

Welcome to the dojo young padiwan.

PL
PlumCaptain21,007 posts
19 May 2018, 16:01
#3
19 May 2018, 16:01#3


CL
CleanCutPro9,905 posts
19 May 2018, 17:02
#4
19 May 2018, 17:02#4

Never ending foul play from these filthy kiwis.

I see Franks has also been cited.

Any bets they get off with a light suspension ... or nothing at all.



JW
Just_winCaptain18,570 posts
19 May 2018, 17:09
#5
19 May 2018, 17:09#5
Probably the result of a cramp, it's important to keep up with your liquids .
PL
PlumCaptain21,007 posts
19 May 2018, 17:11
#6
19 May 2018, 17:11#6

Lol JW

...or mini epileptic fit while airborne. It's a rare but real phenomenon.

sharkbok
sharkbokCaptain23,255 posts
19 May 2018, 17:11
#7
19 May 2018, 17:11#7


If he has ever done something like this before, he could get a long suspension. It certainly looks like he has experience with Marshall arts

PL
PlumCaptain21,007 posts
19 May 2018, 17:26
#8
19 May 2018, 17:26#8

And maybe a bit of an investigation into who is coaching this team to do this. 

PL
PlumCaptain21,007 posts
19 May 2018, 18:12
#9
19 May 2018, 18:12#9

Cloudy, there's history to this.

About two years ago I began saying that Ben Smith was intentionally kicking out like that. There's a lots of evidence for it.

What are the chances that his team mate now gets done for it?

They're being coached to do it.

Surely?

sharkbok
sharkbokCaptain23,255 posts
21 May 2018, 00:10
#10
21 May 2018, 00:10#10
If they are getting coached to feign with their leg, this person surely took things to far. Jumping with a risen knee or foot can be done in a subtle way. I can't believe that the coaches are actually telling players to kick the opposition in the face.Unless he is training at the bad dojo in the Karate Kid.
It is possible that is was just a random brain malfunction and reflex reaction. He might have been messing around kicking the week before at practice, and then just instinctively kicked out in this game in a random fashion.
I would say a minimum of 10 weeks for this. What I expect would be the sentence is---
South Africa- 16 weeksAustralia - 7 weeksNew Zealand - 3 weeks (2 if a test is close by)
XA
XaviPro1,924 posts
21 May 2018, 00:40
#11
21 May 2018, 00:40#11

12 week minimum for a kick to the face I believe but if he pleads guilty and with a clean record they usually halve the sentence so 6 weeks.

Once you factor in that it was a Kiwi team, probably coached, "he was only looking after his own well being while in  the air", Folou hates fags, Saffas are whingers and there's some tests next month. Yip 2 weeks sounds about right. .

3K
3ku1Pro2,580 posts
21 May 2018, 01:26
#12
21 May 2018, 01:26#12

You Saffa are whingers. Can you just saying deserves Red and a few weeks, without the "Filthy Kiwis" Narrative that is riddled here atm. Coached? LOL. Don't make me laugh. You think a player coaches a player to catch a high ball and kick a player in the face intentionally. All that was, was a player in a poor positon. And putting his foot out. IT was reckless and dumb. But to suggest players are coached to do that. I am sorry cannot take that argument seriousley. And also stop being Hypocrties SA fans. Your telling me no SA rugby player ever has been dirty. Or committed a foul? HAHAHAHA. ITs historical for it. 

PL
PlumCaptain21,007 posts
21 May 2018, 10:16
#13
21 May 2018, 10:16#13

@ 3

Make you laugh?

You mean it's funny how I have been saying for some time now that Ben Smith and his Highlander teammates are going beyond lifting  knee and actually kicking out with studs up.

So you reckon that despite their being ample video footage evidence that somehow they are the only ones who jump like that, it's not intentional.

What would be really funny is if you were correct. 

That would mean that Smith and others in his team jump like nobody else in world rugby and all learnt to do this by chance and individually.

I didn't say filthy Kiwis. 

But it's pretty obvious that kicking out like that is a dirty, cheating tactic and the Landers are teaching it to their players.

BR
BrycyPro4,671 posts
21 May 2018, 15:56
#14
21 May 2018, 15:56#14

....plum i don't think the Fijian had been coached to kick the Aussie in the head at all, ...the brief was kick South Africans in the head ....if he was a Kiwi he would'nt have made that simple mistake...

PL
PlumCaptain21,007 posts
21 May 2018, 16:29
#15
21 May 2018, 16:29#15

Lol Brycy

It will be very interesting to observe Ben "Bruce Lee" Smith under high balls now.

My guess is that the kicking won't stop but he'll try and make it look less obvious.

And they'll have to amend the laws because now everybody is going to start doing it. 

PL
PlumCaptain21,007 posts
21 May 2018, 16:30
#16
21 May 2018, 16:30#16

The levels of vindication BTW...epic!

CL
clevermikeCoach57,555 posts
21 May 2018, 16:56
#17
21 May 2018, 16:56#17

The hearing was postponed till tomorrow - since the Highlanders sent Nabura back to NZ - since he is likely to get a lesser fine than in Australia.   So we will know by tomorrow whether it will be  four week ban - with two weeks off for previous good conduct - as is standard with NZ players. 

PL
PlumCaptain21,007 posts
22 May 2018, 22:56
#18
22 May 2018, 22:56#18

https://y outube.com/watch?v=yLwKPqQhKBw

CL
clevermikeCoach57,555 posts
22 May 2018, 23:34
#19
22 May 2018, 23:34#19

Plum 

The hear ing was today - but there is no news about the outcome - I suppose he got away with a warning.

PL
PlumCaptain21,007 posts
22 May 2018, 23:46
#20
22 May 2018, 23:46#20

Of course Mike...

He didn't mean to do it...

His team mates don't do it...

It's only a kick in the face...

Let's not overreact


CL
clevermikeCoach57,555 posts
23 May 2018, 09:28
#21
23 May 2018, 09:28#21

Still no news on this issue.   Maye the Highlanders will call him back for the next game.  We 'll see.

CL
CleanCutPro9,905 posts
23 May 2018, 09:57
#22
23 May 2018, 09:57#22

Yeah ... them Ozzies have hard faces. They can take it. No big deal.

What's all the fuss about?


CL
clevermikeCoach57,555 posts
24 May 2018, 14:27
#23
24 May 2018, 14:27#23
The disciplinary process has been postponed wi no hearing date set - will it ever happen or will it be covered up NZ style?  
CL
clevermikeCoach57,555 posts
25 May 2018, 08:26
#24
25 May 2018, 08:26#24

The decision was a six week ban. It should have been a 12 week ban - but what is normal with NZ players, he got a 50% discount due to good conduct in he past.   If it happened to non-New Zealand players the ban would have been 12 weeks with no reduction.

The system still stinks to high heaven.    

CL
CleanCutPro9,905 posts
25 May 2018, 09:27
#25
25 May 2018, 09:27#25
They usually have their suspensions reduced so what has happened to this filthy kiwi is what I expected. I'll be shocked to see him serve his entire term.
MO
moolaaPro2,380 posts
25 May 2018, 09:47
#26
25 May 2018, 09:47#26
So 3 times the length of suspension that most of you loudmouths predicted on here then? CC, why is it that this bloke who gets a ban is suddenly a filthy Kiwi ? If he had scored a hat trick against the Boks you would have called him a poached Pacific Islander! Make your mind up will you?
BE
Beeno1Captain40,032 posts
25 May 2018, 10:04
#27
25 May 2018, 10:04#27

This poached Pacific islan der got off extremely lightly -  no surprise here.


Moooooo yo have been  very quiet about Chippo's post regarding "Mallet not a racist" Time for you to apologise for all your BS oak. Hahahahahhahahahahahaha

MO
moolaaPro2,380 posts
25 May 2018, 10:08
#28
25 May 2018, 10:08#28
No proof Hasbeeno, all pure speculation, so please go stand in a freezer to await my apology....
PL
PlumCaptain21,007 posts
25 May 2018, 10:13
#29
25 May 2018, 10:13#29

Hehe Moola

I'd say six weeks is a decent ban. 

But if a guy was lying on the floor and you intentionally kicked him in the face, then 12 weeks would seem appropriate. 

So, the deciding factor...

Flying kicks are tougher to land hence skill points are taken into consideration during sentencing.

And then, talking about who WOULD say what...Lets rather talk about who HAS said something.

I said that this flying kick technique was an illegal and dangerous tactic. I spotted it long before anyone else here.

The Kiwis said i was imagining things and nobody was trying to kick anybody in the face. I was making it up. I was a conspiracy nutter. The way Ben Smith jumps is totally normal. Instantly the name calling began. Along with suggestions that i lay off the "weed". Get out of my mom's basement etc etc

Now it has come to pass. Someone on his team has kicked a payer in the face. And he was lucky that he didn't do more damage than he did. I seen punches resulting in 30 stitches. This was studs to the face.

Ben Smith injured a welsh player in the WC, doing the same thing. Wales took it on the chin. 

On ample occasions we've seen players having to duck kicks directed at their faces...all from the same team and the same players. 

It's a cheating tactic. And its not about the result. It's about the action. 

Cheating tactics are normally followed by cries of "Filthy cheat."

The question you should be asking is...

At what point during this do Kiwis look at the evidence on front of them and own up, just on this one occasion, to the fact that one of their teams has been using a dangerous and cheating tactic intentionally for prolonged period of time. 

If it were a Saffa team brining our rugby into disrepute like this i'd be one of the first people here calling for firstly an end to it and secondly for an investigation into who is behind it. And i know for a fact that all the regular Saffa posters here would probably do the same. 

Say whatever you want about Beeno, CC and whoever else but they won't stand for cheating, regardless of whether it's their team doing it or not. What you'll probably find is they'll hold no punches in ripping the player, team or coach doing it to shreds. 

If Kiwis were more willing to discuss these things in a slightly less biased way then the name calling would be nowhere near as regular or severe. 

You are not the victim here. 

Sorry. 

Rugby is.






CL
CleanCutPro9,905 posts
25 May 2018, 10:53
#30
25 May 2018, 10:53#30

Umm ... his kick to the opposing player's face was a filthy act ... hence the term.

Uh-Duh!!

Actually, I'm not surprised that you needed an explanation.

Glad I could help.

Let me know if you need anything else cleared up.


MO
moolaaPro2,380 posts
25 May 2018, 11:34
#31
25 May 2018, 11:34#31
Deliberate ignoring of my question CC or are you just a tad backward?
JW
Just_winCaptain18,570 posts
25 May 2018, 12:55
#32
25 May 2018, 12:55#32
System worked, nothing to see here, move along please
Well, at least it served as a distraction for our wee SA posters. Now this is done we are back to Moz' question, i.e. why so little debate on who should be on the Bok team? Of course wee cc will have to find something else to be angry about & now that his Danes have been bathed he will also have to find a new purpose for his life .
DE
DennyCaptain12,893 posts
25 May 2018, 14:01
#33
25 May 2018, 14:01#33

Bad, bad boys dem Kiwis...….guilty as charged, forget the red card, bannings whatever…..have em arrested.

— END OF THREAD —

More from Rugby

More news