...winning 11 out of 13. And losing only two games! One by 4 points, the other by 1 point.
Just thought I'd point that out.
Captain49,914 posts
04 Oct 2014, 21:55
#1
04 Oct 2014, 21:55#1
HM concludes 12 months with an 85 per cent success ratio
Started by Mozart20 REPLIES140 VIEWS· 04 Oct 2014, 21:55
Captain30,741 posts
04 Oct 2014, 22:01
#2
04 Oct 2014, 22:01#2
Just a pity it's 50% against the sides that are the true measure
Captain49,914 posts
04 Oct 2014, 22:08
#3
04 Oct 2014, 22:08#3
Total scores against teams " that are the true measure"
AB 39.... Boks 37
Oz. 34....Boks 51
Total....Teams that Are the Measure 73.....Boks 88
Game, set and Match.
AB 39.... Boks 37
Oz. 34....Boks 51
Total....Teams that Are the Measure 73.....Boks 88
Game, set and Match.
sharkbok
Captain23,294 posts
Captain23,294 posts
04 Oct 2014, 22:12
#4
04 Oct 2014, 22:12#4
The current Bok team is as good as any Bok team in the professional era, maybe better. The 2009 team was good, as was the 1998 team, and the 1995 team.
The backline attack of the current bok team is probably the best. Beating the All Blacks today who are maybe the best All Black team ever, is some achievement.
Both teams get up for this match, and give 110%.
The backline attack of the current bok team is probably the best. Beating the All Blacks today who are maybe the best All Black team ever, is some achievement.
Both teams get up for this match, and give 110%.
Captain30,741 posts
04 Oct 2014, 22:12
#5
04 Oct 2014, 22:12#5
Bullshit end results are the true score dumb ass
50% is POOR - fact
50% is POOR - fact
Captain49,914 posts
04 Oct 2014, 22:20
#6
04 Oct 2014, 22:20#6
I agree SB, these guys are playing great rugby....with Willie as a key catalyst. Actually vetsak, the ABs only have a 50 percent win ratio as well.....you keep falling over your own feet. game, set and match again.
Captain30,741 posts
04 Oct 2014, 22:25
#7
04 Oct 2014, 22:25#7
Moffie the difference being we lost 2 out of 4, NZ only lost 1 - get it?
Captain49,914 posts
04 Oct 2014, 22:51
#8
04 Oct 2014, 22:51#8
So think back Homophobe to when we were measuring HMs win ratio two years ago...you were one of the loud voices who claimed you couldn't count draws in a win ratio. As you sow shall you reap.
Captain30,741 posts
04 Oct 2014, 22:53
#9
04 Oct 2014, 22:53#9
Moffie w e lost 2 the Kiwi s lost 1 - unless you count a draw as being the equivalent to a loss you moron.
Good one KKK
Good one KKK
Captain49,914 posts
04 Oct 2014, 23:00
#10
04 Oct 2014, 23:00#10
That was exactly the argument you argumentative turncoat....you didn't want to count HMs draws in his win ratio What you sow so shall you reap. The trouble you face is that you have just opened your fat trap too much.
And in case it hasnt dawned on you....you do look like a complete prat today.
And in case it hasnt dawned on you....you do look like a complete prat today.
Captain30,741 posts
04 Oct 2014, 23:02
#11
04 Oct 2014, 23:02#11
Stop lying KKK
The only prat being exposed today is you Moffie....what is Kolbe chicken shit?
The only prat being exposed today is you Moffie....what is Kolbe chicken shit?
Coach57,555 posts
04 Oct 2014, 23:09
#12
04 Oct 2014, 23:09#12
Mozart
Just a pity - the outcome would have been much better if he just got rid of the geritrics like Matfield, Jannie and Bakkies.
Just a pity - the outcome would have been much better if he just got rid of the geritrics like Matfield, Jannie and Bakkies.
Captain49,914 posts
04 Oct 2014, 23:17
#13
04 Oct 2014, 23:17#13
mozart
Status: Hall Of Fame
Posts: 8978meyer's record....for the record
August 12, 2013, 15:15:36I see Meyer's win ratio is quoted at 58%. Well, for the record the Boks have played 15 matches under Meyer and won 10......so his win ratio is actually 66.66%. But there were also two draws....so his loss ratio is a very respectable 20%.We lose one match in five under Meyer.
Status: Hall Of Fame
Posts: 8978meyer's record....for the record
August 12, 2013, 15:15:36I see Meyer's win ratio is quoted at 58%. Well, for the record the Boks have played 15 matches under Meyer and won 10......so his win ratio is actually 66.66%. But there were also two draws....so his loss ratio is a very respectable 20%.We lose one match in five under Meyer.
-
And if you split the draws ....his corrected win ratio is 73.33%.
-
These are simply facts. Gnaw on that you Meyer bashers.
Captain49,914 posts
04 Oct 2014, 23:19
#14
04 Oct 2014, 23:19#14
To which you replied below....negating the draws. So we see once again who is lying....you fat liar Dave.
Saffex
Status: Hall Of Fame
Posts: 9579RE: meyer's record....for the record
August 12, 2013, 21:56:27
Saffex
Status: Hall Of Fame
Posts: 9579RE: meyer's record....for the record
August 12, 2013, 21:56:27
His win ration in his first year was 58% which is not good enough, we were lucky to achieve that given our intercept escape by Frans against the Argies and our scrape throughs against Ireland, Scotland and England at the end of last year.
And wow Meyer has a 100% record this year against the mighty Italy, Scotland and Samoa!!
Meyer and the Boks were crap last year, we were piss poor against Scotland this year and given the squad my guess is we will lose all four to Oz and NZ
Captain30,741 posts
04 Oct 2014, 23:20
#15
04 Oct 2014, 23:20#15
Losing 50% of your games against Oz and NZ is not good enough
Captain49,914 posts
04 Oct 2014, 23:21
#16
04 Oct 2014, 23:21#16
Note the funny prediction at the end....Chicken Little has been at it for some time.
Captain49,914 posts
04 Oct 2014, 23:26
#17
04 Oct 2014, 23:26#17
So now you are trying to turn it to games you lose vs games you win....liar, liar your pants on fire. Virtually everything you post on here is slanted or an outright lie. You are a dishonest person.
The fact is we were close to winning all our games, split with NZ and had a winning aggregate score against the teams that count according to you. And you hated it all the way. The rest of us enjoyed our RC, I feel sorry for you.
The fact is we were close to winning all our games, split with NZ and had a winning aggregate score against the teams that count according to you. And you hated it all the way. The rest of us enjoyed our RC, I feel sorry for you.
Captain30,741 posts
05 Oct 2014, 00:21
#18
05 Oct 2014, 00:21#18
No KKK I am just stating the fact you fucking idiot we lost 2 out of 4 against oz and nz...Are you denying this old man?
Captain49,914 posts
05 Oct 2014, 00:26
#19
05 Oct 2014, 00:26#19
No old chap you are saying winning two with a draw is better than winning two without a draw. Which means my argument that we should split draws in the success percentage was right....and you were wrong. Now after falsely saying you never were in that position, you want to claim NZ draws count. Found out again.
Captain30,741 posts
05 Oct 2014, 00:34
#20
05 Oct 2014, 00:34#20
Moffie you are babbling like an idiot.....I'll keep it simple I don't give a toss about what other sides did.....my concern is the Boks and Meyers record against Oz and NZ this year.
It's simple we lost two or we won two....either way it's 50%
Squirm out of that one old man
It's simple we lost two or we won two....either way it's 50%
Squirm out of that one old man
Captain49,914 posts
05 Oct 2014, 01:09
#21
05 Oct 2014, 01:09#21
Boy this is all above your pay grade. Our win ratio is 50 per cent.....the AB win ratio is 50 per cent. For their 50 per cent to be better than ours (which I believe) you have to effectively give a half point for draws. Something I advocated back in 2013 and which you totally dismissed. I know you are slow, but is the penny beginning to drop. You are contradicting yourself again.
— END OF THREAD —
