FIXTURESNo upcoming fixtures — check back soon.
FORUM / RUGBY /  Hougaard may move to wing permanently

Hougaard may move to wing permanently

Started by sharkbok10 REPLIES287 VIEWS· 03 Sept 2012, 18:08
SHAREXFACEBOOKWHATSAPPTELEGRAMREDDITLINKEDIN
sharkbok
sharkbokCaptain23,301 posts
03 Sept 2012, 18:08
#1
03 Sept 2012, 18:08#1

 

Finally, Meyer can see that is better runner than play maker. His passes are not strong and he is too slow at the base of the ruck.

Hougaard may move to wing permanently by Brenden Nel 03 September 2012, 14:08

 

Springbok halfback Francois Hougaard may have to accept that his future is on the wing for the national team in future after a string of mediocre performances behind the scrum.

Hougaard is set to start out wide this week with the stability of Ruan Pienaar set to be preferred at nine, as coach Heyneke Meyer looks to make tweaks to the side that drew 16-all against Argentina in Mendoza for this weekend’s match against Australia in Perth.

Hougaard’s biggest strength is his elusiveness and his grit in space, a player who can exploit the open field and find holes in defences on attack. But behind the scrum, even though it has been his preferred position, he has struggled this season behind an inexperienced Bok pack that haven’t always given him great ball.

Whenever Pienaar has appeared on the field, it has seen an improvement in the way the Bok backline functions, with Hougaard’s service to his flyhalf also being questioned at times.

It has become rather clear that both Hougaard and Morne Steyn are under increasing pressure to perform or be dropped. While it doesn’t seem like Meyer will throw young Johan Goosen into the deep end at flyhalf this weekend, a starting role for him cannot be too far away if the current trend continues.

Still, Hougaard is a player that – as Meyer likes to point out – has that X-factor. Last year when Bryan Habana was struggling for form at the World Cup, Hougaard’s appearances off the bench and on the wing were the breath of fresh air the team often needed and it is understandable he is highly-rated for his gamebreaking ability.

But at the moment, playing him at 9 comes at a cost, and slow ball against the Aussies is something the Boks can ill-afford at the moment. And judging from Meyer’s comments there is a real indication that Hougaard could move to wing permanently.

Meyer has warned that these two away games are the last chances for combinations across the field. Reiterating his desire for players of “character”, the Bok coach is set to make the hard decisions sooner rather than later if players fail to produce.

All that starts with this weekend’s match where Hougaard is likely to be moved back onto the wing. A decent performance for Pienaar behind the scrum may seal it, and Hougaard may well have to resign himself to the fact that if he wants to play in the starting line-up, he will have to start competing with the wingers to do so.

One thing is certain, the entire team has been put on notice to improve their play or face the consequences. As Meyer points out, the performance in Mendoza was unacceptable, and the Boks know this.

Now he wants to see character from players who can rise above the challenges that the opposition pose.

“You only learn when you play away. At home the 50-50 decisions tend to go your way because the crowd is behind you. You only learn when players are under pressure, you can’t see how they will react in training. They have to be placed under huge pressure for you to see what they are made of,” Meyer said of the lessons learnt in Mendoza.

“I’ve always said we would use this year to give players opportunities to prove themselves. A guy like Eben (Etzebeth) for instance, is a world class player – he is like Bakkies Botha at the same age and he has shown he deserves to be there, and he can play under pressure. I’m a big believer in players with character.

“But this is the last opportunity for combinations, I know I have been criticized for certain selections and certain positions. I know where I’m going to and I know what is the best position for certain players. I’ll take these two games, give guys a chance and then I’ll know which is the best positions for them.”

The last sentence seems to point directly to the 9/10 combination, which has received the majority of criticism thus far, but it can also point to Andries Bekker, who has not performed close to expectations, or the loose trio, which also needs to function more as a unit on the field.

Meyer has placed a load of emphasis on protecting the Boks ball – which was one of the massive problems in Mendoza with 12 turnovers. While he is right to point out that the classic opensider would not have made such a difference in Argentina, he also must admit that the balance of the loose trio wasn’t right, and the entire pack did little to protect the ball. Ruck Cleanouts were never at a premium in Mendoza, and they will have to be in Perth if the Boks are to have front-foot ball.

This is apparently the reason why Keegan Daniel was omitted from the squad, even though Meyer is on record as saying Australia would have suited his game. The Bok coach has chosen to go for a more balanced loose trio, where Duanne Vermeulen can be expected to be joined by Willem Alberts and Marcel Coetzee, while Francois Louw could find himself on the bench if the Bok coach’s comments are anything to go by.

“The Sharks and Stormers never played with a specialist openside fetcher the entire Super Rugby season. Even a guy like Richie McCaw isn’t a classical opensider. I’m a big fan of McCaw, because he can clean, defend and steal balls. Marcel can be the next McCaw, he just needs to become a little more clinical at the breakdown.

“As for Keegan, I know I said Australia would fit his gameplan more, but I feel we don’t have a classical No8 at the moment, and Pierre Spies and Ryan Kankowski are both out. Against Argentina, although we competed well at the front of the lineout, we gave them easy ball at the back. I wasn’t happy with the way we competed there. Duanne is a specialist 8 and has combined well with Andries and Eben for the Stormers. I had to question if the fifth guy on the bench should be another number 8 or a specialist opensider. I want the option if the ref allows a bit more at the breakdown to have such a guy on the bench, so it is unfortunate for Keegan.”

The one good aspect at the moment, and one which is hardly mentioned, is that when the injuries to JP Pietersen, Bismarck du Plessis, Heinrich Brussow, Pierre Spies, Schalk Burger, Chiliboy Ralepelle, Siya Kolisi and Bjorn Basson are over, and Kankowski returns from Japan, the amount of depth in the national ranks should be good.

Until then the Boks will need to find a way to put up a better performance than Mendoza. Or risk losing their places.

MD
Monkey D LuffyPro6,277 posts
03 Sept 2012, 18:48
#2
03 Sept 2012, 18:48#2

i still think that hougaard is the future Springbok No9, but his performances do warrant a change and pienaars performances to date make him the logical replacement. i even had hougaard on the wing and pienaar at  hlafback in the Boks team i thought who should play in perth.

but one thing meyer didnt delve into too much was this comment he mad,,,

"Meyer has placed a load of emphasis on protecting the Boks ball – which was one of the massive problems in Mendoza with 12 turnovers"


while hougaard had some obvious flaws in his game, IMHO it was the forwards who let him down the most, i havent seen any halfback in the IRC have to work as hard as hougaard to get the ball.
meyer was right the Boks protecting the ball was a problem in mendoza, but it has been a problem in every single 2012 Bok test.

if hougaard is moved to the wing, hopefully he takes this as a chance to go out and further improve his game, while he continues to work on his halfback game behind the scenes, but regardless most will agree that hougaard needs to start in some capacity.

 

MO
MozartCaptain49,914 posts
03 Sept 2012, 20:57
#3
03 Sept 2012, 20:57#3

 Another massive moment for the Sapp. Get this, Dave had Hougaard as the best scrum half on the planet a few weeks back. 

sharkbok
sharkbokCaptain23,301 posts
03 Sept 2012, 22:32
#4
03 Sept 2012, 22:32#4

 Hougaard may have the highest work rate of any wing in the world. When he is on the wing he gets involved, not like sometimes when our other wings just stagnate.

He does not just sit and wait for the ball. Really good running on the ball from the blind side. This gives us much more variation and unpredictability.

Although this could also be a weakness as we could be vulnerable to quick counter attacks by the opposition. Although defensively on the wing he has had no issues that I recall to date. 

 

KI
kingcornPro3,695 posts
04 Sept 2012, 12:47
#5
04 Sept 2012, 12:47#5

They have to decide once and for all, is he a wing our a scrummie, there is no point in putting him on the wing when he should be warming the bench to enable him to focus on 9 play. By shifting him to the wing you are telling the guys its okay to mess up, we still have room for you. 

What the boks could have up there sleaves in terms of impact is to have Hougaard and Goosen on the bench, bringing these guys on in the last 20 minutes would make any teams heads drop. This will enable us to expose the pair on the international stage. I still think Hougaard is a quality 9 but he doesn't suite Meyers game plan as a nine of kicking the ball away. 

Just imagine a bok backline with in inform hougaard that plays to a game plan that encourages attack.

9 Hougaard

10 Goosen

11 Habana

12 Frans Steyn

13 Jordaan

14 Mvovo

15 Lambie

CL
clevermikeCoach57,555 posts
04 Sept 2012, 13:59
#6
04 Sept 2012, 13:59#6

Kingcorn

Let me in the first ibnstance say clearly that I rate Hougaard very highly as a player - he has speed, guile and real performance ability on his side.   However, he is not a natural scrummie and that is a fact of life.   His passing of balls to the backline remains a serious problem - insofar as two aspects is concerned, namely insofar as accuracy and speed of delivery is concerned.   He tends to tun a few steps before passing and does not possess the accuracy to allow for players to catch the ball running onto it.   That to a major extend neutralises backline performances.   What I in particular do not like of Hougaard is the Bull strategy (inherited from Joost and from Du Preez) to stand waiting behind mauls and waving of their arms to get forwards in place to receive the ball.   On international level that is fatal - since you normally slow down the game and allow the opposition to form up their defences..  

Hougaard's kicking game is a real nightmare and I do believe that Meyer does not really require a kicking game from his scrummie - unless those kicks can lead to strategic advantages for the team. Hougaard's  kicking game as a scrummie is poor and inaccurate,

Having the above in mind I believe the cupboard insofar as scrummies are concerned is nearly empty, so I watched with keen interest scryummie performances in the CC games this past week - especially since Vermaak is even worse than Hougaard.   I was impressed by  only two scrummies who played - namely Groom and to a slightly lesser extent Pretorius.   Both delivered fast and accurate service to the backline and minimized the kicking game.   However, none of the two was ever really under pressure and that would not be the case on international level. 

The answer to my mind is that we are wasting Hougaard's talents by using him as a scrummie - and we desperately need to find and develop scrummies who can use theur natural tealents to deliver a fast and efficient service to the backline.

In general I do like the remainder of your backline selection - but one player in that combination will have to buck up his performances otherwise he will be a square peg in a round hole - and that is Francois Steyn.   Unless he gets back to what he was early in his playing career - he is not really going to contribute positively to efficient an effective backline play.    

CL
clevermikeCoach57,555 posts
04 Sept 2012, 13:59
#7
04 Sept 2012, 13:59#7

Sorry - duplication

DE
DennyCaptain12,893 posts
04 Sept 2012, 14:10
#8
04 Sept 2012, 14:10#8

It's the obvious move to make, I can't understand why it's taken this long. Said it before, the kid is an top of the ground type of  player, our first one since re-admission, he was wasted at scrummie.

EK
EkPro1,464 posts
04 Sept 2012, 17:17
#9
04 Sept 2012, 17:17#9

 

Denny
 
Status: Bok regular 
Posts: 789 RE: Hougaard may move to wing permanently
September 04, 2012, 12:10:07

It's the obvious move to make, I can't understand why it's taken this long. Said it before, the kid is an top of the ground type of  player, our first one since re-admission, he was wasted at scrummie.

 

 

Surely not, if I think you mean what you mean.

BE
Beeno1Captain40,032 posts
04 Sept 2012, 18:33
#10
04 Sept 2012, 18:33#10

Moz could you please be nice to the snapster given his current difficulties?

Flashdakota
FlashdakotaClub Pro805 posts
04 Sept 2012, 23:09
#11
04 Sept 2012, 23:09#11

Where is the fat pale chop?

Im beginning to miss him

— END OF THREAD —

More from Rugby

More news