How long is Morne Steyn going to last at Stade Francais?

Fuck me sideways. Have you even watched the game or have you just decided to practice your trolling skills again? I still have three of the Top14 games of the weekend on my Tivo Box, so I had a quick look for you. This is more or less what happened when Steyn came on in the last 20 minutes of the game:

• 62 min. The first time Steyn got the ball was about 7 m away from the Biarritz goal line in the middle of the field. He was cut-off from his outside center en drove onto the Biarritz defence, moving forward to just inside the five yard line before being driven back again by three Biarritz defenders. He kept possession of the ball when going to ground and released it to Parisse who picked it6 up and drove forward before passing to his inside centre who scores under the posts. MS converts.
• 64:12. Kickoff by Biarritz gatherred inside the SF 22m. Ball passed to MS close to the goal line. who passes to no 12 who passes to Meyer Bosman who passes to the wing who kicks it down field but doesn't find touch. Biarritz kicks it back to SF.
• 64:28. Steyn gets the ball about 4m outside of his own 22. So, he can not kick it directly into touch. He kicks it well into the Biarritz 22m. Joe Pietersen who kicks it out just inside of the SF half. The nett result of MS' kick is a gain of about 15 metres and the throw in at the line-out. From the line-out the ball is kicked downfield again by the scrumhalf, not MS. Ball not out. Biarritz kicks it back out on the Biarritz 10m. SF throw.
• 66:24. Parisse wins the ball and drives forward. Scrumhalf gets the ball from the maul, out to MS, out to Meyer Bosman. play carries on up to Biarritz 22m where a ruck forms. Scrumhalf out to Meyer Bosman who changes direction and pases to MS, out to no 8, to Parisse, to no 9, to Bosman. A maul forms. Out to no 9, to MS, to Meyer Bosman to no 14, who is taken out over the touchline. They are called back for a penalty and a yellow card against Biarritz for a high late tackle on Bosman.
• 67:32. MS takes the penalty and kicks for touch from well within the Biarritz half.
• 67:55. SF take a deep throw in the line-out and they win it at the back. The ball goes from the scrumhalf directly to Bosman who came cutting in from outside centre.
• 68:09. Try for SF. Morne comverst.
• 70:06. Kick-off. SF gets the ball on their own 22m. Scrumhalf kicks it out. Line-out etc, and nothing really happens for some time.
• 73:58. Yashvilli lets go with a crosskick into SF 22m. No 14 takes a mark, taps it and passes to Steyn, 3m away from his own goal line, who kicks the ball out on the halfway line. At this stage the score is 38-3 in favour of Stade. Line-out again and several phases of play takes place.
• 76:25. MS gets the ball inside his own in-goal area and kicks the ball downfield. Not out. This was the first time sonce he came on 16 minutes earlier that he did not kick the ball out from insside his won 22m. The ball is passed in-filed to Joe Pietersen who makes who carries the ball up before being taken down. A rcuk forms and Stade is penalised. They tap and go. Get up to 2m from the SF goal line before they loose the ball forward, the no 9 gets the ball but is driven out over the touchline. So, the ref calls them back for a scrum from where Biarritz lost the ball forward.
• 78:28. They have a scrum 5 m from the SF goal line and next to the touchline on the right (for SF) side of the field.
• 78:36. SF wins a penalty from the scrum and MS kicks the ball out, just inside his own half.
• 79:33. SF stuffs up the line-out and Biarritz wins it. Biarritz plays accross the field. A maul forms with Parrise, Meyer Bosman and MS involved. Biarritz gets the ball out and take it doen the line.
• 81:00. Another maul just inside the SF 22m. SF gets a penalty and MS kicks it into touch.

It is not even worth commenting. Ou Maaik. Jy praat alweer kak.

By the way. The youngster who started at flyhalf for Stade de Francais had a very good game as well.

Talking about a piss pot thinker. You are the idiot around here. I am not writing Morne Steyn up jou poepol. I ma correcting the bullshit you have been spewing in writing him down. I know that Bosman had a great game in the time that he was on, end if he was in question I would have done the same. Having said that, I have given an account of Bosman's play as well. Since you have clearly not really watched the game youy would not even have knwo that Bosman had a great game as well.

What is intersting is that despite the fact that I have just shown you what a load of crap you have been talking, you just carry on where you left off.

Let me help you. This is what I you said: " His first two relieving kicks did not even reach the sideline and lead to counter-attacks by the opposition.". I have just told you that the first relieving kick could not be kicked directly into touch. He was outside of his 22m, poepol. Had he kicked it directly into touch, the line-out would have been where he kicked it from, and with the throw in for Biarritz. Instead, he kicked it downfield, from where Biarritz kicked it out with a nett gain of 15m for SF and with the advantage of the throw in the line-out. Next kick that you are talking about. His next l kick (four minutes from full time) was from inside his own goal area. That was the one that he did not kick out. The nett result of that one was that Joe Pietersen was caught in possession well up-field but then SF got penalised. Had they not been penalised he would have taken play from inside his in-goal area to the middle of the field. You cannot blame him for his team mates giving away a penalty. There was no quick throw in from any of his kicks, like you have said. He had two relieving kicks. One that he could not have kicked and didn't, out and one that he could have kicked out but didn't.

Instead of hammering because I did not write a moerse essay about Meyer Bosman (whose play you didn't question), why don't you comment and admit that you have been talking kak about MS's play. You have, after all, started the topic exclusively to piss on MS, and now you are hammering me for not changing the topic and write about Meyer Bosman. What a joke.

 To the muffled fart piss pot thinker. You could have simply siad Mike I think you have it wrong here.  Morne - etc etc.

Beeno trying to help windpomp to behave decently in a public forum. Let's not get all nasty again windpomp!

Geez Maaikie, how low can you go? I am going to ask you once again. Give me the times in the game that those fabrications of yours took place. Is there any reason in particular why you are dodging that? Let me make a suggestion. I have given you an account with the times that it happened. Why don't you give me your "true" version of what happened at those times during the game. You have just said that I was wrong on virtually every count. Why don't you explain to me where I went wrong. It cannot be that difficult. I only raised about 14 or so instances. Come on tell me where I was wrong.

Let me give you an example of what I am talking about. I said "64:28. Steyn gets the ball about 4m outside of his own 22. So, he can not kick it directly into touch. He kicks it well into the Biarritz 22m. Joe Pietersen who kicks it out just inside of the SF half. The nett result of MS' kick is a gain of about 15 metres and the throw in at the line-out. From the line-out the ball is kicked downfield again by the scrumhalf, not MS. Ball not out. Biarritz kicks it back out on the Biarritz 10m. SF throw."  Let us suppose that that was one of the ones that I got wrong, then tell me what really happened at that point in the game.

I could have been cruel and asked you to give us your account of what happened, in the same way that I did, i.e. tell us what happened at those instances during the game. You do really have the game recorded, don't you?

 Brother Cera de Jaager, that oak cannot give you the time of day if you slapped him with a clock. Reading his comments I am sure his domestic is more of an expert. Daais lekka mal outjie.

Freddie my bra, I still do not believe that he has even watched the game before he started this thread, and he still has not watched it. The fact that he says that the starting flyhalf was average proves that because, during the game, I was thinking to myself that these guys are lucky to have a youngster like the 22 Jules Plisson and MS in their squad.

Vlag the joke is this provincial municipality worker actually thinks he is the great manipulator.

clevermike

Status: Rugby Legend
Posts: 6592 RE: How long is Morne Steyn going to last at Stade Francais?
September 04, 2013, 21:30:42

Ceradyne

I will give you just one example. That kick at 76:25 never reached the touchline - it was caught in the field of play and passed to Pietersen to counter-attack. I would not even bother to deal with the rest of your drivel.

Hahahahaha. Jou arme poepol. You just managed to poke yourself in the eye. Did I say anything else? Go check. I will even copy and paste it for you for easy reference. I have changed nothing. I did not even correct the spelling mistake.

"76:25. MS gets the ball inside his own in-goal area and kicks the ball downfield. Not out. This was the first time sonce he came on 16 minutes earlier that he did not kick the ball out from insside his won 22m. The ball is passed in-filed to Joe Pietersen who makes who carries the ball up before being taken down. A rcuk forms and Stade is penalised. They tap and go. Get up to 2m from the SF goal line before they loose the ball forward, the no 9 gets the ball but is driven out over the touchline. So, the ref calls them back for a scrum from where Biarritz lost the ball forward."

Now come on jou blerrie mamparra. Show me where I was wrong on virtually every account. Try again.

What are you going to do Oom leave my garbage on the pavement.

Oom your blatant lying is disgusting , Ceradyne clearly says in his posting at 13.27 that the kick at minute 76 was not out......and you know it. Liars aren't welcome and you are a disgusting example. 

At first I thought that it was not right calling you a poepol and a mamparra, but now I can see that you are a fokken poepol. Let me copy it again for you. Read it again. Maybe it is a question of third time lucky. I said, in my original post that it was NOT OUT.   Go check again. Let me copy and paste it for you once again.

76:25. MS gets the ball inside his own in-goal area and kicks the ball downfield. Not out. This was the first time sonce he came on 16 minutes earlier that he did not kick the ball out from insside his won 22m. The ball is passed in-filed to Joe Pietersen who makes who carries the ball up before being taken down. A rcuk forms and Stade is penalised. They tap and go. Get up to 2m from the SF goal line before they loose the ball forward, the no 9 gets the ball but is driven out over the touchline. So, the ref calls them back for a scrum from where Biarritz lost the ball forward.

Now do me a favour. Read that slowly and then scroll up to my original post and compare it to see if there is anything different. Please man. And if it is still too complicated, then get someone to read and explain it for you.

Moz, I have never made a secret of the fact that I believe that MS is a good flyhalf but this has nothing to do with the fact that it is about MS. It is all about Mike's constant lying and twisting of facts. He has been caught out on many occasions but he just would not learn. He thinks that those lengthy essays of his will always hide the bullshit, but sometimes someone picks up on it.

Still ducking and diving ou Maaik?

I have to admit that I did not have the international windown issue 100% correct, but neither did you. While it is a IRB sanctioned competition, it is not an official IRB competition. Go check, and you will see that the IRB competitions are:

(a) Union Designated Release Events:
(i) The quadrennial Rugby World Cup Tournament and qualification Matches.
(ii) The quadrennial Rugby World Cup Sevens event.
(iii) An Olympic Sevens Rugby event and qualification Matches.

(b) Combined Teams Designated Release Events:
(i) The quadrennial British and Irish Lions Tour is a Designated Event and all Players selected to participate shall be eleased. The Release Period shall ordinarily 1 commence on 1 June and ordinarily conclude on the 2nd weekend of July in the relevant year.

(ii) The quadrennial Tour of the Combined Team of the Pacific Islands Unions (Fiji, Samoa and Tonga) is a Designated Event and all Players selected to participate shall be released. The Tour will take place in the November window in the relevant year.

The RC falls under the SH international Window which ends on 31 August. So, in effect the rules of Regulation 9 only covers SARU for that period. This meant that SARU was under no obligation to release the players for the TOP14 games on 30 & 31 August, but it was a give and take compromise. The clubs were equally under no obligation  to release the players for the rest of the RC, but they have agreed to do so. It is as clear as daylight. You were suggesting that the French clubs had leverage to have the players released, but you were lightyears away from the truth. This is it and go on, prove me wrong. The French clubs requisted for the players to be released. They were in no position to demand it, because the International international Window was still in effect up and until 31 August.

Your next blatant lie is that I said that the Top 14 is above the level of CC rugby. I did not say that, I said that you were wrong in suggesting that the Top14 is on a lower level than CC rugby. That is simply not true, due to the quality of players playing in the CC. You clearly do not watch and/or follow the European competitions.

The next blatant lie is that you say that you do not personally attack people on this board. How many threads have you started directed at Saffex, Mozart and others with the sole purpose of baiting and ridiculing them. Is that not a form of personal attacking. In addition, you have the habit of telling people that they are stupid, etc. Same thing.

With that out of the way, let us look at this remark of yours: "You were caught out as a liar and a misrepresenter of fact - now because your total garbage about Morne Steyn was proven to be unadulterated drivel"

Could you please please please show me exactly where and how you have proven that. You have not provided a singles hred of anything proving that I liad about what happened in that game. Nothing. Niks. In fact, your one single effort, the one about the kick 76 minutes into the game blew up in your face, proving that you were in fact the one who were bullshitting. You have an enormous amount of egg that you need to wash off your face, mate, unless you can come up with something to prove that my account of what happened was BS. 

That game is not available on YouTube, and I have it on my Tivo box. The only way that I can get it on YouTube is to make a video of the TV screen, which will be of poor quality, but I am prepared to do that. It will take me a day or two. I cannot put a video camera on a tripod, because I have a fault on my camera, so I will have to do it with my phone and I will have to hold the phone in my hand to do that. I am prepared to do that, so everybody can watch the video and compare it with my notes. The question is: "Will you have the balls to admit that you have falsely accused my of lying, will you have the balls to admit that you were bullshitting about what happened in the game, will you have the balls to admit that you did not watch the game and most of all will you have the balls to admit that MS was not as crap as you suggested he was." Answer me that and I will go through the trouble of making and posting that YouTube clip.

Mike, Mike, Mike... aai, aai, Mike

It is your opinion that Ceradyne changed what he said. But let's look at it objectively. Like a robot/computer.

If you understand unix as O/S, the following will mean something to you....

root@socrates:~ #> vi cer1                                                                                                <Thu 05 Sep 9:50
root@socrates:~ #> vi cer2                                                                                                <Thu 05 Sep 9:50
root@socrates:~ #> vi cer3                                                                                                <Thu 05 Sep 9:51

Where I paste the three "versions" from him

root@socrates:~ #> diff cer1 cer2                                                                                         <Thu 05 Sep 9:51
root@socrates:~ #> diff cer1 cer3                                                                                         <Thu 05 Sep 9:51
root@socrates:~ #> diff cer2 cer3                                                                                         <Thu 05 Sep 9:51

Where the computer compared the three versions. As you can see the output is zero (or nothing), zip, zilch

As your "atrocious" reading skills or otherwise known as your reading "deficiencies" prevent you from reading the same thing a number of times in a row and getting the same understanding from the same words, I suggest you appoint someone who can read on your behalf and then explain it to you.

DYSEXLIA LURES KO!

One has to admire anyone tring to make sense of ou windpomps endless drivel.

Mike dont worry about ou windpomp he is a liar par excellence and nasty with it.

Hahahaha.

I havejust explained to you how and why players had and can be released but you still tie your own connotation to it.

You keep on acting like a dom poepol. Just give me your version of what happened at those times that I talked about. Simple. Just to say that you do not agree with me does not make it fact. You know that if I put that video clip on, you are going to be embarrassed. You are busy painting yourself in a corner and you cannot get out of it. I say again. It will take me a day or two to do that video clip, but I will only undertake to do it if you agree to the terms that I set out previously. Let me repeat them for you.

"Will you have the balls to admit that you have falsely accused my of lying, will you have the balls to admit that you were bullshitting about what happened in the game, will you have the balls to admit that you did not watch the game and most of all will you have the balls to admit that MS was not as crap as you suggested he was."

Agree to that, and I will make the video. Remember that I stand to lose face here. You believe that you are correct and if so, than the video will prove that.

 Hahahahahahahaha here is the big liar asking if someone else has the balls to admit they are lying. Hahahahahahahaha extreme comedy from the liar windpomp.  One other thing - you dont act lie a dumb poepol windpomp you are one.Bwahahahahhahahahahaha

Mike you are dealing with shifting sands here, he says one thing then the next minute he did not say that, twists and turns and throws up one bit of nonsense after another. This guy has lied incessantly about me for years and I have zip respect for him. So if I were you I wouldnt take anything he says too seriously - take it from whence it comes stuff.

There you gou ou Maaik. There is your video clip. It is not done very well and the sound level is not really good. I have to re-capture the entire thing and turn the volume on the TV up to improve that, and I do not have the time now. www.youtube.com/watch

Feel free to show me where my account of the what happened was virtually wrong on every count. Also, point out to us where and when the quick throw in occured.

Hahahahaha.

You do not have the balls to watch that video clip, you yellow bellied bullshitting liar. Come on, you made the allegation that I have been wrong and that you were correct. Tell me where, on that clip do you see the kicks that you were talking about. Where is the one that resluted in a quick throw in. Where was I wrong on virtually every count. You have been caught out. Begin vreet aan daai eiers op jou gevreet, pappie.

Hey ou egg-face Maaik. I see you are starting new threads, hoping that this one would drop down to the bottom and off the index page.......................

Thanks for that. I take it that you are now at last going to show me where I went wrong with respect to my perception of that game? I am waiting in suspence. Just telling me that I am lying without showing any proof of my lies is not going to help your cause a lot now, is it. I am waiting patiently to point me to my mistakes/lies.